Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Vandermonde's identity checked at m=4m = 4, n=3n = 3, k=3k = 3, both sides equal to 3535

Example

Take m=4m = 4, n=3n = 3 and k=3k = 3 in Vandermonde's identity (m+nk)=i<k+1(mi)(nki)\binom{m+n}{k} = \sum_{i<k+1}\binom{m}{i}\binom{n}{k-i}. The left-hand side is (73)=35\binom{7}{3} = 35, and the right-hand side is

(40)(33)+(41)(32)+(42)(31)+(43)(30)=1+12+18+4=35.\binom{4}{0}\binom{3}{3} + \binom{4}{1}\binom{3}{2} + \binom{4}{2}\binom{3}{1} + \binom{4}{3}\binom{3}{0} = 1 + 12 + 18 + 4 = 35 .

The same identity at k=5k = 5, still with m=4m = 4 and n=3n = 3, exercises the boundary convention: three of the six terms vanish because their coefficients are 00, and both sides come to 2121.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M:=4×{0}M := 4\times\{0\} and N:=3×{1}N := 3\times\{1\}, disjoint with M=4\lvert M\rvert = 4, N=3\lvert N\rvert = 3 and MN=7\lvert M\cup N\rvert = 7; and the factorials 2!=22! = 2, 3!=63! = 6, 4!=244! = 24, 5!=1205! = 120, 7!=50407! = 5040 (The factorial n!n! and the falling factorial nkn^{\underline{k}}, defined by recursion in N\mathbb{N}).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The coefficients needed, all from [L2]. (73)3!4!=7!\binom{7}{3}\cdot 3!\cdot 4! = 7! gives (73)624=5040\binom{7}{3}\cdot 6\cdot 24 = 5040, so (73)144=5040\binom{7}{3}\cdot 144 = 5040 and (73)=35\binom{7}{3} = 35. Similarly (42)2!2!=4!\binom{4}{2}\cdot 2!\cdot 2! = 4! gives (42)=6\binom{4}{2} = 6; and (40)=(33)=(30)=1\binom{4}{0} = \binom{3}{3} = \binom{3}{0} = 1, (41)=4\binom{4}{1} = 4, (43)=(41)=4\binom{4}{3} = \binom{4}{1} = 4 by symmetry, (31)=(32)=3\binom{3}{1} = \binom{3}{2} = 3. Also (75)5!2!=7!\binom{7}{5}\cdot 5!\cdot 2! = 7! gives (75)240=5040\binom{7}{5}\cdot 240 = 5040, so (75)=21\binom{7}{5} = 21.

givenL2
2.1

The case k=3k = 3. The four terms of the sum, indexed by i<4i < 4, are (40)(33)=11=1\binom{4}{0}\binom{3}{3} = 1\cdot 1 = 1, (41)(32)=43=12\binom{4}{1}\binom{3}{2} = 4\cdot 3 = 12, (42)(31)=63=18\binom{4}{2}\binom{3}{1} = 6\cdot 3 = 18 and (43)(30)=41=4\binom{4}{3}\binom{3}{0} = 4\cdot 1 = 4; their sum is 1+12+18+4=351+12+18+4 = 35, equal to (73)\binom{7}{3}.

step 1.1L1L3
2.2

The case k=5k = 5, where the boundary convention does the work. The sum runs over i<6i < 6 and its terms are (40)(35)=0\binom{4}{0}\binom{3}{5} = 0, (41)(34)=0\binom{4}{1}\binom{3}{4} = 0, (42)(33)=6\binom{4}{2}\binom{3}{3} = 6, (43)(32)=12\binom{4}{3}\binom{3}{2} = 12, (44)(31)=3\binom{4}{4}\binom{3}{1} = 3 and (45)(30)=0\binom{4}{5}\binom{3}{0} = 0, the vanishing ones being those with 5i>35-i > 3 or i>4i > 4. The total is 6+12+3=21=(75)6+12+3 = 21 = \binom{7}{5}.

step 1.1L1L2L3
3.1

The partition behind one block. The term with i=2i = 2 in step 2.1 counts the sets S[MN]3S \in [M\cup N]^{3} with exactly two elements in MM; the bijection of [L1] sends such an SS to the pair (SM,SN)(S\cap M, S\cap N). For instance S={(0,0),(1,0),(0,1)}S = \{(0,0),(1,0),(0,1)\} goes to ({(0,0),(1,0)}, {(0,1)})[M]2×[N]1\big(\{(0,0),(1,0)\},\ \{(0,1)\}\big) \in [M]^{2}\times[N]^{1}, and there are (42)(31)=18\binom{4}{2}\binom{3}{1} = 18 such SS, which is the value computed there. So the identity is a count, not an algebraic accident.

step 1.1step 2.1L1
4.1

Both instances confirm [L1]: at k=3k = 3 both sides are 3535, at k=5k = 5 both sides are 2121, and in the second the terms whose blocks are empty contribute 00 exactly as the identity's lack of a range restriction requires.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

Remarks

  • Why a case with vanishing terms is included. The identity is stated for all mm, nn, kk with no side condition, and that is only correct because out-of-range binomial coefficients are 00 rather than undefined. Checking a case where three terms vanish is checking exactly that clause.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 72 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources