How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a comparison map between resolutions is unique as a chain map
Statement
False. A comparison map between two projective resolutions is unique as a > chain map.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard projective resolution of .
Comparison maps lifting the same object morphism are unique only up to chain homotopy (Projective comparison maps are unique up to chain homotopy).
Refutation
On two copies of the displayed resolution, multiplication by in both degrees and multiplication by in both degrees are distinct augmentation-preserving chain maps lifting , because and .
Step 1.1 exhibits two different comparison maps lifting the same object morphism. By [L1], the positive theorem only identifies them up to homotopy, so uniqueness as an actual chain map is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- Romyar Sharifi, Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)