How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A connection is c infinity linear in the section being differentiated
Statement
For every connection, for all smooth , vector fields and sections .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The proposed universal assertion.
A connection satisfies (Connection laws in directional form).
A prescribed smooth connection matrix in a global frame defines a connection (Local connection forms glue exactly when they obey the transformation law).
Refutation
On over , take global frame and zero matrix, giving by [F2]. Put , , . Then , while .
At these are respectively the nonzero unit fibre vector and zero, disproving the assertion even in rank one and at a zero of . The correct formula has the missing term . A constant or a zero section would not witness failure; this explicit nonconstant and nonzero section do.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)