How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local connection forms glue exactly when they obey the transformation law
Statement
Let a smooth vector bundle be covered by supplied frames on , with on overlaps. Matrices of smooth one-forms are the local matrices of a unique connection if and only if on every overlap. No local finiteness or choice assumption is required for this gluing statement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The specified smooth bundle atlas and matrices of smooth one-forms.
Matrices of an intrinsic connection satisfy the stated rule (Connection one form transformation law).
An intrinsic connection is a real-linear smooth Hom-section-valued map satisfying the one-form Leibniz law (Connection on a smooth vector bundle).
Proof
Necessity is the transformation formula for each pair of frames. For sufficiency, write on and define there . This is a smooth Hom section since its local entries are sums and products of smooth functions and their derivatives.
On an overlap put , so . The ordinary product rule and the assumed matrix identity give . Multiplying by shows the two definitions agree. They therefore assign a unique global value at every point; smoothness holds because near each point it is one of the displayed smooth local expressions.
The local rule is real-linear, and proves its Leibniz identity. Consequently is a connection. Any connection with the prescribed matrices must have these local values, by its Leibniz rule applied to each frame expansion, proving uniqueness. Empty overlaps require no matching; an empty base has the unique zero connection. A single chart needs no gluing, while rank zero and base dimension zero make the expression zero. The agreed values in step 2.1 specify the global object uniquely without choosing a chart for every point.
Depends on
Used by
- A torsion free connection that is not metric compatible Counterexample
- Dual connection Definition
- Product connection on tensor and hom bundles Definition
- Pullback connection Definition
- A connection one form on a trivial line bundle Example
- The flat connection on a trivial vector bundle Example
- A connection is c infinity linear in the section being differentiated False statement
- Christoffel symbols are components of a tensor False statement
- Every affine connection is the levi civita connection of a riemannian metric False statement
- Every connection on a riemannian vector bundle is metric compatible False statement
- Parallel transport depends only on the endpoints of a curve False statement
- Every smooth vector bundle admits a connection Theorem
- Pullback connection is well defined and functorial Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)