Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every pointwise bounded sequence of continuous functions has a uniformly convergent subsequence

Statement

False claim: every pointwise bounded sequence of continuous real functions on a compact interval has a uniformly convergent subsequence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The universal claim in the Statement.

[L1]

For fk(x)=sin((k+1)x) on [0,π], the sequence (fk) is uniformly bounded, is not equicontinuous, and has no uniformly convergent subsequence (The sine harmonics are pointwise bounded but have no uniformly convergent subsequence).

[L3]

The number π=2γ is positive because the smallest positive zero of cosine satisfies γ(0,2), and every closed bounded interval in R is compact (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two, Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval [a,b] is compact).

Refutation

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that every pointwise bounded sequence of continuous real functions on a compact interval has a uniformly convergent subsequence.

assume-contra
1.2

Each function in [L1] is continuous by [L2], and the sequence is uniformly bounded by [L1], hence pointwise bounded, on the compact interval [0,π] from [L3].

L1L2L3
2.1

The assumed claim gives this sequence a uniformly convergent subsequence, contradicting [L1]. Therefore the claim is false; the missing Arzelà–Ascoli hypothesis is equicontinuity.

step 1.1step 1.2L1discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources