How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every pointwise bounded sequence of continuous functions has a uniformly convergent subsequence
Statement
False claim: every pointwise bounded sequence of continuous real functions on a compact interval has a uniformly convergent subsequence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The universal claim in the Statement.
For on , the sequence is uniformly bounded, is not equicontinuous, and has no uniformly convergent subsequence (The sine harmonics are pointwise bounded but have no uniformly convergent subsequence).
Sine is continuous, affine real functions are continuous, and composites of continuous real functions are continuous (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, A function differentiable at is continuous at , Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, claim 5, A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs).
The number is positive because the smallest positive zero of cosine satisfies , and every closed bounded interval in is compact (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two, Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval is compact).
Refutation
Suppose, for contradiction, that every pointwise bounded sequence of continuous real functions on a compact interval has a uniformly convergent subsequence.
Each function in [L1] is continuous by [L2], and the sequence is uniformly bounded by [L1], hence pointwise bounded, on the compact interval from [L3].
The assumed claim gives this sequence a uniformly convergent subsequence, contradicting [L1]. Therefore the claim is false; the missing Arzelà–Ascoli hypothesis is equicontinuity.
Depends on
- The sine harmonics are pointwise bounded but have no uniformly convergent subsequence
- The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
- A function differentiable at $c$ is continuous at $c$
- Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function
- A composite of continuous functions is continuous, with no side hypothesis of the kind the composition of limits needs
- Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval $[a,b]$ is compact
- Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine
- Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Hutchinson, Introduction to Analysis, §15.7, Remark 15.7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)