How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: any sequence of morphisms is a chain complex
Statement
Any sequence of morphisms in an abelian category is a chain complex.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sequence in .
is an abelian category (Abelian groups form an abelian category).
A chain complex requires consecutive composites to be zero (Chain complex in an abelian category).
Refutation
By [L1], the displayed sequence is a sequence of morphisms in an abelian category.
Its consecutive composite is , which is not the zero endomorphism of . Therefore [L2] shows that this sequence is not a chain complex.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)