Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler-Poincare formula for finite free complexes

Statement

Let C∙ be a bounded chain complex of finite-rank free abelian groups. Assume that every homology group Hn(C) is free of finite rank. Then χ(C)=∑n∈Z(−1)nrank⁡(Hn(C)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded chain complex C∙ of finite-rank free abelian groups whose homology groups are free of finite rank.

[L1]

The Euler characteristic is the finite alternating sum ∑n(−1)nrank⁡(Cn) (Euler characteristic of a finite complex of finite-rank free abelian groups).

[L2]

Homology is the quotient Zn(C)/Bn(C) (Homology object of a chain complex).

[L3]

Abelian groups and Z-modules are the same objects and morphisms (Abelian groups and Z-modules have the same objects and morphisms).

[L4]

The ring Z is a principal ideal domain: it is a commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring), it has no zero divisors (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation), and every ideal is generated by one integer because every subgroup of (Z,+) is cyclic (Every subgroup of (Z,+) is ⟨n⟩=nZ for exactly one natural number n, Principal ideal domain).

[L5]

A submodule of a finite-rank free module over a PID is again finite free (A submodule of a free module of finite rank over a PID is free of no larger rank).

[L6]

A finite free module over a commutative ring is projective (Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat).

[L7]

A short exact sequence ending in a projective module splits (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3L4L5given

By [L3] and [L4], each Cn is a finite-rank free Z-module over a PID. Therefore [L5] makes every cycle group Zn(C)≤Cn and every boundary group Bn(C)≤Cn finite free. Since the homology groups are finite free by the hypothesis, all ranks appearing below are defined.

2.1L2L6L7L8step 1.1algebra

By [L2], the short exact sequence 0→Zn(C)→Cn→Bn−1(C)→0 has projective quotient Bn−1(C) by steps 1.1 and [L6], so [L7] splits it. Likewise 0→Bn(C)→Zn(C)→Hn(C)→0 splits because Hn(C) is finite free by hypothesis and hence projective by [L6]. Using [L8], split exactness gives rank⁡(Cn)=rank⁡(Zn(C))+rank⁡(Bn−1(C)) and rank⁡(Zn(C))=rank⁡(Bn(C))+rank⁡(Hn(C)).

3.1L1step 2.1algebra

Substitute the second identity of step 2.1 into the first: rank⁡(Cn)=rank⁡(Bn(C))+rank⁡(Hn(C))+rank⁡(Bn−1(C)). Multiply by (−1)n and sum over all n. The boundedness in [L1] makes this a finite sum, and the two boundary sums cancel after the index shift m=n−1: ∑n(−1)nrank⁡(Bn−1(C))=−∑n(−1)nrank⁡(Bn(C)). Hence only the homology contribution remains.

4.1L1step 3.1∎

The resulting identity is ∑n(−1)nrank⁡(Cn)=∑n(−1)nrank⁡(Hn(C)), which is exactly the formula in the statement by [L1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources