Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every Cauchy sequence in a metric space converges

Statement

The following statement is FALSE.

Let (X,d) be a metric space (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric) and let (xk) be a Cauchy sequence in it (Cauchy sequence in a metric space). Then (xk) converges to a point of X (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R).

Equivalently: every metric space is complete (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space), so that the word complete is redundant.

This is the error that the whole page exists to guard against. It is encouraged by the Cauchy criterion on the real line (The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges), which is a theorem about R and not about metric spaces.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open interval X:=(0,1)⊆R (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) with the metric d(x,y):=∣x−y∣ inherited from R; the sequence xk:=1/(k+2) for k∈N; a real ε>0.

[A1]

The false claim: every Cauchy sequence in every metric space converges in that space.

[L4]

Limits in a metric space are unique (A sequence in a metric space has at most one limit).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Every term lies in X: k+2≥2>0 gives xk=1/(k+2)>0, and k+2≥2 gives xk≤1/2<1. So (xk) is a sequence in X, and d is a metric on X.

L1L2
1.2

xk→0 in (R,∣⋅∣): given a real ε>0, [L2] supplies N≥1 with 1/N<ε, and for k≥N we have k+2>N, hence ∣xk−0∣=1/(k+2)<1/N<ε.

L1L2L3
2.1

Hence (xk) is Cauchy in (R,∣⋅∣), and since d is the restriction of the metric of R and all terms lie in X, the same indices witness that (xk) is Cauchy in (X,d).

step 1.1step 1.2L1L3
2.2

Suppose (xk) converged in (X,d) to some p∈X. Distances in (X,d) are distances in R, so xk→p in (R,∣⋅∣) as well; with step 1.2 and uniqueness of limits in R this forces p=0.

step 1.2L1L4
3.1

But 0∉X, since X=(0,1) contains only reals >0. So (xk) has no limit in (X,d).

step 1.1step 2.2
4.1

Therefore (X,d) is a metric space carrying a Cauchy sequence that does not converge in it, which refutes [A1]; the displayed statement is false, and (0,1) is not complete.

step 2.1step 3.1A1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources