Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: completeness of a metric space is determined by its topology

Statement

The following statement is FALSE.

Let d and d′ be metrics on the same set X that are topologically equivalent, that is Td=Td′ (Topologically, uniformly and Lipschitz equivalent metrics on a set, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement). Then (X,d) is complete if and only if (X,d′) is complete (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).

Equivalently, and this is the form in which the error is usually made: completeness is a topological property of a metrisable space, so that it makes sense to call a topological space "complete".

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set P:={ n∈N:n≥1 } of positive naturals, regarded inside R through the canonical embedding; the functions d(m,n):=∣m−n∣ and d′(m,n):=∣1/m−1/n∣ on P×P; a real ε>0.

[A1]

The false claim: topologically equivalent metrics on one set are either both complete or both incomplete.

[L2]

Reciprocation is strictly decreasing on the positive reals, so 0<a<b gives 0<1/b<1/a; in particular m↦1/m is injective on P (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L3]

Positive naturals sit in R in their own order, and for naturals m≠n one has ∣m−n∣≥1, since one of them is at least the successor of the other (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, The natural numbers N (von Neumann), The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

d is a metric on P, being the restriction to P×P of the usual metric of R.

L1
1.2

d′ is a metric on P: symmetry and the triangle inequality are inherited from the absolute value applied to the reals 1/m, and d′(m,n)=0 forces 1/m=1/n and hence m=n, because m↦1/m is injective on P.

L1L2
2.1

Every subset of P is open for d: for m∈P the ball Bd(m,1/2) is {m}, since d(m,n)=∣m−n∣≥1>1/2 for n≠m; so every subset is a union of open balls.

step 1.1L3L5
2.2

Every subset of P is open for d′: fix m∈P and put r:=1/m−1/(m+1), a positive real. If n>m then 1/n≤1/(m+1), so d′(m,n)=1/m−1/n≥r; and if n<m then m≥2 and 1/n≥1/(m−1), so d′(m,n)=1/n−1/m≥1/(m−1)−1/m>1/m−1/(m+1)=r. Hence Bd′(m,r)={m} and every subset is a union of open balls.

step 1.2L2L4L5
2.3

(P,d) is complete: let (xk) be d-Cauchy and apply the definition with ε=1 to get K with ∣xm−xn∣<1 for all m,n≥K; by [L3] this forces xm=xn for m,n≥K, so the sequence is constant from K on and converges to xK∈P.

step 1.1L3L5
2.4

(P,d′) is not complete. Put ak:=k+1, a sequence in P. Given a real ε>0, [L4] gives N≥1 with 1/N<ε/2; for k,l≥N we have k+1>N and l+1>N, hence 1/(k+1)<1/N and 1/(l+1)<1/N, so d′(ak,al)=∣1/(k+1)−1/(l+1)∣≤1/(k+1)+1/(l+1)<2/N<ε. Hence (ak) is d′-Cauchy.

step 1.2L2L4L5
3.1

Therefore Td=Td′: both are the collection of all subsets of P, so d and d′ are topologically equivalent.

step 2.1step 2.2L5
3.2

Suppose ak→p in (P,d′) for some p∈P. Since 1/p>0, [L4] gives N≥1 with 1/N<1/(2p), and then for every k≥N we have 1/(k+1)≤1/N<1/(2p), so d′(ak,p)=∣1/(k+1)−1/p∣≥1/p−1/(k+1)>1/p−1/(2p)=1/(2p)>0. So d′(ak,p) never drops below 1/(2p) from any index on, contradicting convergence to p; as p∈P was arbitrary, (ak) has no limit in (P,d′).

step 2.4L2L4L5
4.1

So d and d′ are topologically equivalent metrics on P with (P,d) complete and (P,d′) not, which refutes [A1]. The displayed statement is false.

step 3.1step 2.3step 2.4step 3.2A1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources