How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a closed and bounded subset of a metric space is compact
Statement
False claim: in every metric space (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric), a subset that is closed in (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement) and bounded (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space) is a compact subset of (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).
Where the claim comes from, and what is actually true. One half of the Heine-Borel property does hold in every metric space: a compact subset is closed and bounded (A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded). The converse holds in with the Euclidean metric (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), and the claim above is that reading of Heine-Borel transplanted to an arbitrary metric space, where it fails. What survives in general is that a compact space is complete and totally bounded (A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle), and it is total boundedness, not boundedness, that the witness below lacks.
The refutation builds its own witness: the set carrying the metric that assigns distance to distinct points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The set of natural numbers (The natural numbers (von Neumann)) and the function with for and for .
The false claim: in every metric space a closed bounded subset is compact.
A metric on a set is a real-valued function satisfying (M1) exactly when , (M2) and (M3) (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).
; a set is open when each of its points has a ball around it inside it; a set is closed when its complement is open; and a subset is bounded when it is empty or lies in a ball (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).
A subset of a metric space is compact exactly when the metric subspace is a compact metric space; and a compact metric space has, for every family of open subsets with union the space, a finite subfamily with union the space (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).
A nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum, one of its members (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).
For every real there is a natural with , where is the canonical natural of (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, The canonical natural of a field).
Refutation
is a metric on : (M1) holds because was defined to mean ; (M2) because the defining condition is symmetric in and ; and (M3) because the left side is or , and when it is one has , so differs from at least one of and and the right side is at least .
In one has , since forces and hence ; consequently every subset of is open, each of its points having inside it, and every subset is closed as well.
is a closed subset of the metric space , and it is bounded, since for every gives .
The family consists of open subsets of and has union , because for every .
No finite subfamily has union : such a subfamily is for some and naturals , with union by step 2.1; the reals have a maximum , and a natural with then satisfies and hence for every , so lies in and in no member of the subfamily.
Hence is not a compact metric space, so is a closed and bounded subset of the metric space that is not compact, and the claim [A1] is false.
Remarks
What the witness fails is total boundedness, not boundedness. The space has diameter , so it is as bounded as a nonempty space can be; but a finite -net would have to contain every point, and is not finite ( with the discrete metric is bounded and is not totally bounded ↗, FALSE: a bounded metric space is totally bounded). Since a compact space is totally bounded (A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle), that alone already settles non-compactness; the explicit cover of step 3.2 is given because it makes the failure visible without any theory.
The witness is complete, so completeness is not the missing ingredient either. In a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence convergent, so this is a complete, bounded, closed space that is not compact. The pair that is equivalent to compactness, once the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are assumed, is completeness together with total boundedness (For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice).
A second, analytically natural witness is the closed unit ball of the bounded real-valued functions on under the supremum metric, where the indicator functions of the singletons are pairwise at distance (In the bounded real-valued functions on with the supremum metric, the closed unit ball is closed and bounded and is not compact: the indicator functions of the singletons are pairwise at distance ↗).
Depends on
- Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space
- Countably compact, sequentially compact and limit point compact metric spaces
- A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded
- A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Finite $\varepsilon$-net and totally bounded metric space
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
- Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
- Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum
- Maximum and minimum of a set
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 135 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Heine-Borel theorem (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Discrete space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Compact space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)