Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: a closed and bounded subset of a metric space is compact

Statement

False claim: in every metric space (X,d)(X,d) (Metric space: d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 iff x=yx = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric), a subset that is closed in XX (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement) and bounded (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space) is a compact subset of XX (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).

Where the claim comes from, and what is actually true. One half of the Heine-Borel property does hold in every metric space: a compact subset is closed and bounded (A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded). The converse holds in Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the Euclidean metric (Heine-Borel in Rn\mathbb{R}^n: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), and the claim above is that reading of Heine-Borel transplanted to an arbitrary metric space, where it fails. What survives in general is that a compact space is complete and totally bounded (A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle), and it is total boundedness, not boundedness, that the witness below lacks.

The refutation builds its own witness: the set N\mathbb{N} carrying the metric that assigns distance 11 to distinct points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set N\mathbb{N} of natural numbers (The natural numbers N\mathbb{N} (von Neumann)) and the function d:N×NRd : \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R} with d(m,n)=0d(m,n) = 0 for m=nm = n and d(m,n)=1d(m,n) = 1 for mnm \ne n.

[A1]

The false claim: in every metric space a closed bounded subset is compact.

[L1]

A metric on a set is a real-valued function satisfying (M1) d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 exactly when x=yx = y, (M2) d(x,y)=d(y,x)d(x,y) = d(y,x) and (M3) d(x,z)d(x,y)+d(y,z)d(x,z) \le d(x,y) + d(y,z) (Metric space: d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 iff x=yx = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[L2]

B(x,r)={y:d(x,y)<r}B(x,r) = \{y : d(x,y) < r\}; a set is open when each of its points has a ball around it inside it; a set is closed when its complement is open; and a subset is bounded when it is empty or lies in a ball (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).

[L3]

A subset AA of a metric space is compact exactly when the metric subspace (A,dA)(A,d_A) is a compact metric space; and a compact metric space has, for every family of open subsets with union the space, a finite subfamily with union the space (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).

[L4]

A nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum, one of its members (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

[L5]

For every real MM there is a natural N1N \ge 1 with M<ι(N)M < \iota(N), where ι\iota is the canonical natural of R\mathbb{R} (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

dd is a metric on N\mathbb{N}: (M1) holds because d(m,n)=0d(m,n) = 0 was defined to mean m=nm = n; (M2) because the defining condition is symmetric in mm and nn; and (M3) because the left side is 00 or 11, and when it is 11 one has xzx \ne z, so yy differs from at least one of xx and zz and the right side is at least 11.

L1
2.1

In (N,d)(\mathbb{N},d) one has B(n,1)={n}B(n,1) = \{n\}, since d(n,m)<1d(n,m) < 1 forces d(n,m)=0d(n,m) = 0 and hence m=nm = n; consequently every subset of N\mathbb{N} is open, each of its points nn having B(n,1)B(n,1) inside it, and every subset is closed as well.

L2step 1.1
3.1

N\mathbb{N} is a closed subset of the metric space (N,d)(\mathbb{N},d), and it is bounded, since d(0,n)1<2d(0,n) \le 1 < 2 for every nn gives N=B(0,2)\mathbb{N} = B(0,2).

L2step 2.1
3.2

The family (B(n,1))nN(B(n,1))_{n \in \mathbb{N}} consists of open subsets of N\mathbb{N} and has union N\mathbb{N}, because nB(n,1)n \in B(n,1) for every nn.

L2step 2.1
4.1

No finite subfamily has union N\mathbb{N}: such a subfamily is B(n0,1),,B(nk,1)B(n_0,1), \dots, B(n_k,1) for some kNk \in \mathbb{N} and naturals n0,,nkn_0, \dots, n_k, with union {n0,,nk}\{n_0, \dots, n_k\} by step 2.1; the reals ι(n0),,ι(nk)\iota(n_0), \dots, \iota(n_k) have a maximum MM, and a natural N1N \ge 1 with M<ι(N)M < \iota(N) then satisfies ι(N)ι(ni)\iota(N) \ne \iota(n_i) and hence NniN \ne n_i for every iki \le k, so NN lies in N\mathbb{N} and in no member of the subfamily.

L4L5step 2.1step 3.2
5.1

Hence (N,d)(\mathbb{N},d) is not a compact metric space, so N\mathbb{N} is a closed and bounded subset of the metric space (N,d)(\mathbb{N},d) that is not compact, and the claim [A1] is false.

A1L3step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1

Remarks

What the witness fails is total boundedness, not boundedness. The space (N,d)(\mathbb{N},d) has diameter 11, so it is as bounded as a nonempty space can be; but a finite 1/21/2-net would have to contain every point, and N\mathbb{N} is not finite (N\mathbb{N} with the discrete metric is bounded and is not totally bounded , FALSE: a bounded metric space is totally bounded). Since a compact space is totally bounded (A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle), that alone already settles non-compactness; the explicit cover of step 3.2 is given because it makes the failure visible without any theory.

The witness is complete, so completeness is not the missing ingredient either. In (N,d)(\mathbb{N},d) a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence convergent, so this is a complete, bounded, closed space that is not compact. The pair that is equivalent to compactness, once the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are assumed, is completeness together with total boundedness (For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice).

A second, analytically natural witness is the closed unit ball of the bounded real-valued functions on N\mathbb{N} under the supremum metric, where the indicator functions of the singletons are pairwise at distance 11 (In the bounded real-valued functions on N\mathbb{N} with the supremum metric, the closed unit ball is closed and bounded and is not compact: the indicator functions of the singletons are pairwise at distance 11 ).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 135 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources