How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every affinely reparametrized geodesic remains unit speed
Statement
False claim: if a geodesic is parametrized with unit speed, then every affine reparametrization of it is still parametrized with unit speed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Euclidean line with metric , the curve on , and the affine diffeomorphism of .
Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection computes the Levi--Civita symbol from the metric coefficient; for the constant Euclidean coefficient every derivative in that formula is zero, so . Coordinate geodesic equation says that in a coordinate a curve is geodesic exactly when
Affine reparametrization of a geodesic is a geodesic says that is geodesic whenever is, and that its speed is times the speed of .
Refutation
In the global Cartesian coordinate on the Euclidean line, [F1] gives . The coordinate function of is , so and [F1] makes a geodesic. Its velocity is , whose norm for is , so has unit speed.
The affine map has nonzero constant slope and hence is a genuine affine reparametrization. By [F2], is still a geodesic, but , so it is not unit speed.
Thus the displayed curve and reparametrization refute the universal claim. The exact failure is the missing restriction : slopes and preserve unit speed, every other nonzero absolute slope changes it, and slope would give a constant geodesic rather than a reparametrization diffeomorphism. The witness is one-dimensional, has no finite parameter endpoints or degenerate interval, and is explicit, so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Remark 15.1.2 and Example 15.1.3, pp. 113--114 (standard reference, not scraped)