How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every injective immersion is a proper embedding
Statement
False claim: every injective immersion is a proper embedding.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map
A proper injective immersion is a smooth embedding (A proper injective immersion is a smooth embedding).
Refutation
The map is smooth and injective, and its derivative never vanishes. Thus is an injective immersion.
The compact set has inverse image , which is not compact. So is not proper. Its image is also not closed in .
By [L1], properness is exactly the extra hypothesis missing from this example. Therefore the displayed injective immersion is not a proper embedding, and the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Embeddings (standard reference, not scraped)