How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flat modules need not have projective dimension zero
Statement
False claim: every flat module has projective dimension zero.
Counterinstance: is a flat, nonprojective -module. This counterinstance and the exclusion of projective dimension zero require no Axiom of Choice.
Refutation
Given: the -module .
A nonzero integer cannot annihilate a nonzero rational number, so is torsion-free. The choice-free Torsion-free abelian groups are flat makes it flat over .
Every homomorphism is zero. For and every positive integer , additivity gives . Thus the integer is divisible by every positive integer. A nonzero integer cannot have this property: choose ; if with integer , then , a contradiction. Hence for every .
The canonical cover sends to , by Every module is a quotient of a free module. If were projective, its lifting property in Projective modules and the lifting property would give a section with . For each index , coordinate projection is a homomorphism to by The free module on a set and its standard basis, so by step 1.2. All coordinates of every are zero; hence , contradicting . Thus is not projective, without assuming projective abelian groups are free.
By Projective dimension of an object, a length-zero projective resolution exists exactly for a projective module. Step 2.1 rules it out for the flat module in step 1.1, refuting the claim. No arbitrary projective-resolution existence is asserted in the choice-free conclusion.
Depends on
Used by
- A flat nonprojective module Example
- Vanishing Tor one does not require a projective factor False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)