Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: the rational numbers form a Baire space

Statement

The false claim is: Q, with its usual subspace topology from R, is a Baire space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

For a topological space X, the following are equivalent: every countable intersection of dense open sets is dense; every countable union of closed sets with empty interior has empty interior; no nonempty open subset is meagre in X; and every residual subset meets every nonempty open set. The equivalence includes the empty space. (Equivalent forms of the Baire property).

[F2]

Let X be a topological space and let AX. The set A is nowhere dense when int(A)= (def-interior-closure-boundary-top). It is meagre when there is a sequence (Nn)nN of nowhere dense subsets of X with AnNn. It is residual, or comeagre, when XA is meagre. The empty union shows that is meagre, including when X=. (Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space).

[F3]

Write QR for the image of Q in R under the canonical embedding qq^ (lem-rat-embeds-dense), the set usually written Q once the identification is made, and put X:=RQR for the irrationals. Then: 1. QR is an Fσ set (def-f-sigma-g-delta) and is meager (def-nowhere-dense-meager); 2. X is a Gδ set and is residual; 3. QR is not a Gδ set, and X is not an Fσ set. Claims 1 and 2 are bookkeeping. Claim 3 is the substance and is exactly where thm-baire-category-r is spent: no argument from the algebra of open and closed sets alone can reach it, since QR and X are interchanged by complementation while Fσ and Gδ are, so any such argument would prove the same thing about both sets and about neither. (Q is Fσ, meager and not Gδ, while the irrationals are Gδ, residual and not Fσ).

[F4]

QN (def-equinumerous): the rationals are countably infinite (def-countable). No choice principle is used. The one place where a reader expects a choice, "pick a representative a/b of each rational", is exactly where lem-rat-positive-denominator applies: every rational has a representative with positive denominator, so the map (a,b)[(a,b)] defined on Z×Z>0 is already surjective onto Q, and countability follows from a surjection without ever selecting a representative. The same device handles Z, which is a surjective image of N×N by construction (def-integers). (Q is countably infinite).

[F5]

Let (X,d) be a metric space (def-metric-space) and let p,qX with pq. Put r:=d(p,q)/2. Then r>0 and B(p,r)B(q,r)=. Both sets are open (thm-metric-open-set-algebra) and contain p respectively q (def-metric-ball), so every metric space is Hausdorff: distinct points are separated by disjoint open sets (def-metric-topology). (Distinct points of a metric space have disjoint balls around them).

[F6]

Let (X,T) be a topological space (def-topological-space). The following implications hold, and each is proved by an earlier item of this page. 1. Perfectly normal implies completely normal, assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice (def-countable-choice). 2. Completely normal implies normal, and perfectly normal implies normal. 3. Normal together with T1 implies T3, that is regular together with T1. 4. Completely regular implies regular, and Tychonoff implies T3. 5. Regular together with T1 implies Urysohn, which implies Hausdorff, which implies T1, which implies T0. 6. Metrizable implies every property named above: a metrizable space is perfectly normal, completely normal, normal, Tychonoff, completely regular, T3, regular, Urysohn, Hausdorff, T1 and T0, with no choice principle used. Reading the numbered axioms in order, clauses 1 to 5 give T6T5T4T3T212T2T1T0, the first arrow under ACω, together with T312T3. This is the whole of the classical chain that this page proves, and it is one arrow short of the classical chain. The implication T4T312 — a normal T1 space is completely regular — is Urysohn's lemma and is not available at this point in the reading order. Its absence is recorded, with what would license it, in this page's conventions remark; it is deliberately not asserted here, and no clause above may be read as giving it. (The implications proved on this page: perfectly normal gives completely normal under countable choice, and completely normal gives normal; normal with T1 gives T3; completely regular gives regular; regular with T1 gives Urysohn, hence Hausdorff, hence T1, hence T0; and metrizable gives every one of them).

[F7]

Let (X,T) be a topological space (def-topological-space) and let Tcof be the cofinite topology on the set X (def-standard-topologies). The following four conditions are equivalent. - (a) X is T1 (def-t0-and-t1-spaces). - (b) {x} is closed for every xX. - (c) F is closed for every finite FX (def-countable). - (d) TcofT, that is, the topology of X is finer than the cofinite topology on the same set. Condition (d) says that the cofinite topology is the coarsest T1 topology on any set: it is T1 by the equivalence, and every T1 topology on that set contains it. (A space is T1 if and only if every singleton is closed, if and only if every finite subset is closed, if and only if its topology contains the cofinite topology).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

In the subspace topology each rational singleton is closed with empty interior, while the rational numbers are countable.

givenF7F1F6F4
2.1

Thus the whole nonempty space is meagre in itself, contradicting the nonmeagre-open form of the Baire property.

step 1.1F1F5F6
3.1

Cross-check with the published statement that the rationals are meagre and not Gδ in the real line.

step 2.1F6F2F3
4.1

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 165 results over 31 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources