How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the rational numbers form a Baire space
Statement
The false claim is: , with its usual subspace topology from , is a Baire space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
For a topological space , the following are equivalent: every countable intersection of dense open sets is dense; every countable union of closed sets with empty interior has empty interior; no nonempty open subset is meagre in ; and every residual subset meets every nonempty open set. The equivalence includes the empty space. (Equivalent forms of the Baire property).
Let be a topological space and let . The set is nowhere dense when (def-interior-closure-boundary-top). It is meagre when there is a sequence of nowhere dense subsets of with . It is residual, or comeagre, when is meagre. The empty union shows that is meagre, including when . (Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space).
Write for the image of in under the canonical embedding (lem-rat-embeds-dense), the set usually written once the identification is made, and put for the irrationals. Then: 1. is an set (def-f-sigma-g-delta) and is meager (def-nowhere-dense-meager); 2. is a set and is residual; 3. is not a set, and is not an set. Claims 1 and 2 are bookkeeping. Claim 3 is the substance and is exactly where thm-baire-category-r is spent: no argument from the algebra of open and closed sets alone can reach it, since and are interchanged by complementation while and are, so any such argument would prove the same thing about both sets and about neither. ( is , meager and not , while the irrationals are , residual and not ).
(def-equinumerous): the rationals are countably infinite (def-countable). No choice principle is used. The one place where a reader expects a choice, "pick a representative of each rational", is exactly where lem-rat-positive-denominator applies: every rational has a representative with positive denominator, so the map defined on is already surjective onto , and countability follows from a surjection without ever selecting a representative. The same device handles , which is a surjective image of by construction (def-integers). ( is countably infinite).
Let be a metric space (def-metric-space) and let with . Put . Then and Both sets are open (thm-metric-open-set-algebra) and contain respectively (def-metric-ball), so every metric space is Hausdorff: distinct points are separated by disjoint open sets (def-metric-topology). (Distinct points of a metric space have disjoint balls around them).
Let be a topological space (def-topological-space). The following implications hold, and each is proved by an earlier item of this page. 1. Perfectly normal implies completely normal, assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice (def-countable-choice). 2. Completely normal implies normal, and perfectly normal implies normal. 3. Normal together with implies , that is regular together with . 4. Completely regular implies regular, and Tychonoff implies . 5. Regular together with implies Urysohn, which implies Hausdorff, which implies , which implies . 6. Metrizable implies every property named above: a metrizable space is perfectly normal, completely normal, normal, Tychonoff, completely regular, , regular, Urysohn, Hausdorff, and , with no choice principle used. Reading the numbered axioms in order, clauses 1 to 5 give the first arrow under , together with . This is the whole of the classical chain that this page proves, and it is one arrow short of the classical chain. The implication — a normal space is completely regular — is Urysohn's lemma and is not available at this point in the reading order. Its absence is recorded, with what would license it, in this page's conventions remark; it is deliberately not asserted here, and no clause above may be read as giving it. (The implications proved on this page: perfectly normal gives completely normal under countable choice, and completely normal gives normal; normal with gives ; completely regular gives regular; regular with gives Urysohn, hence Hausdorff, hence , hence ; and metrizable gives every one of them).
Let be a topological space (def-topological-space) and let be the cofinite topology on the set (def-standard-topologies). The following four conditions are equivalent. - (a) is (def-t0-and-t1-spaces). - (b) is closed for every . - (c) is closed for every finite (def-countable). - (d) , that is, the topology of is finer than the cofinite topology on the same set. Condition (d) says that the cofinite topology is the coarsest topology on any set: it is by the equivalence, and every topology on that set contains it. (A space is if and only if every singleton is closed, if and only if every finite subset is closed, if and only if its topology contains the cofinite topology).
Refutation
In the subspace topology each rational singleton is closed with empty interior, while the rational numbers are countable.
Thus the whole nonempty space is meagre in itself, contradicting the nonmeagre-open form of the Baire property.
Cross-check with the published statement that the rationals are meagre and not in the real line.
The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.
Depends on
- Equivalent forms of the Baire property
- Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space
- $\mathbb{Q}$ is $F_\sigma$, meager and not $G_\delta$, while the irrationals are $G_\delta$, residual and not $F_\sigma$
- $\mathbb{Q}$ is countably infinite
- Distinct points of a metric space have disjoint balls around them
- The implications proved on this page: perfectly normal gives completely normal under countable choice, and completely normal gives normal; normal with $T_1$ gives $T_3$; completely regular gives regular; regular with $T_1$ gives Urysohn, hence Hausdorff, hence $T_1$, hence $T_0$; and metrizable gives every one of them
- A space is $T_1$ if and only if every singleton is closed, if and only if every finite subset is closed, if and only if its topology contains the cofinite topology
Used by
- FALSE: every metrizable space is Čech-complete False statement
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 165 results over 31 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Marker, Descriptive Set Theory, §§1–2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael Kunzinger, General Topology, §§11.3–11.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MFF General Topology course summary, §4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)