Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cylinder sets and continued fractions exhibit the homeomorphism NN≅R∖Q

Example

Under the homeomorphism NN≅R∖Q, a finite cylinder corresponds to the irrational points in the continued-fraction interval determined by the same finite prefix; extension of prefixes gives nested intervals.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

Baire sequence space NN is homeomorphic to the irrational subspace R∖Q. (Baire sequence space is homeomorphic to the irrational real numbers).

[F2]

For simple continued fractions with a0∈Z and an≥1 for n≥1, the convergents satisfy pn=anpn−1+pn−2 and qn=anqn−1+qn−2, with pnqn−1−pn−1qn=(−1)n−1. A code cylinder C(a0,…,an)⊆NN and the real interval J(a0,…,an) with endpoints pn/qn and (pn+pn−1)/(qn+qn−1) are different objects and are not identified; it is the intervals J that are nested as the prefix is extended, with diam⁡J(a0,…,an)=1/(qn(qn+qn−1))→0. (Continued-fraction convergents, determinant identities, and nested irrational cylinders).

[F3]

The continued-fraction coding of def-simple-continued-fraction-coding is a bijection from the sequences (a0,a1,…) with a0∈Z and an≥1 for n≥1 onto R∖Q, and both the coding map and its inverse are continuous for the cylinder and subspace topologies (Infinite simple continued fractions parametrise the irrational real numbers).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF2F1

Work out the first continued-fraction cylinders and show how extending a finite sequence nests the corresponding irrational interval.

2.1step 1.1F2F1F3

The parametrisation used here is the specific continued-fraction bijection of [F3], not merely the existence of some homeomorphism, which is all [F1] asserts. By [F3] that bijection and its inverse are continuous for the cylinder and subspace topologies, so cylinder convergence corresponds to ordinary convergence of irrational values; the zero-th coordinate convention is the integer decoding fixed in [F2].

3.1step 2.1∎

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources