How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zp is the full profinite completion of the integers
Statement
is the full profinite completion of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime .
is the pro- completion of (Zp is the pro-p completion of the integers).
The full profinite completion of is over all primes (The profinite completion of the integers is the direct product of the p-adic integer groups over all primes).
Refutation
By [L1], remembers only the finite quotients of whose order is a power of .
By [L2], the full profinite completion also has the -primary factor for every prime . Therefore omits the prime-to- information and cannot be the whole profinite completion.
So the stated claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jordan Bell, The profinite completion of the integers, the p-adic integers, and Prufer p-groups (standard reference, not scraped)