How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A homomorphism of finitely generated pro-p groups is surjective exactly when the induced map on Frattini quotients is surjective
Statement
Let be a continuous homomorphism of finitely generated pro- groups. Then is surjective if and only if the induced linear map is surjective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous homomorphism of finitely generated pro- groups.
In a finitely generated pro- group, a subset topologically generates the group exactly when its image spans the Frattini quotient (A subset topologically generates a finitely generated pro-p group exactly when its image spans the Frattini quotient over Fp).
Proof
If is surjective, then every quotient map induced by , including , is surjective.
Conversely, suppose is surjective, and let . The image of in is all of by hypothesis, so [L1] says that topologically generates . But is compact as the continuous image of the profinite group , hence closed in the Hausdorff group . A closed subgroup whose closure is all of must equal , so is surjective.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both implications. In the trivial-group boundary case, both maps are automatically surjective.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gareth Wilkes, Profinite Groups and Group Cohomology lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Lubotzky, Combinatorial group theory for pro-p groups (standard reference, not scraped)