How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The two defining forms of A_1 agree
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Let be a weight on (Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w)). Then the following are equivalent:
- almost everywhere for some constant , where is the centred ball maximal function (The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions);
- , the supremum over axis-parallel cubes, where the essential infimum is defined in Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights.
Moreover the least constants satisfy and for a dimensional constant , and the same equivalence holds with the uncentred maximal function in place of . In particular the cube-average/ essential-infimum condition may be used as an equivalent definition of with a characteristic changed only by a dimensional factor; a positive average divided by a zero essential infimum is interpreted as ; the class itself is the one of Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; A weight , the centred and uncentred ball maximal functions and , and the cube averages .
and Lebesgue-a.e., and for every cube one has (Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w)).
For every ball there is an axis-parallel cube with , and for every cube there is a ball with ; consequently, if and , then by nonnegativity (Ball and cube maximal functions are pointwise comparable).
For a nonnegative function the set where does not satisfy a pointwise inequality of the form a.e. is contained in a null set, and countable unions of null sets are null (Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure).
is countable and dense in , so cubes with rational centre and rational side length approximate any given cube from outside with volume comparable by a fixed factor ( is a countable dense subset of , and rational open boxes form a countable basis).
Proof
Assume (1), with constant . For each cube of side and each , the centred ball contains and has volume at most a dimensional multiple of . Thus for almost every . Taking the essential infimum and then the supremum in gives . If the hypothesis instead uses , the same estimate holds since .
Assume (2). For each rational-centred, rational-sided cube , the set is null. Their union is null by [F3, F4]. For and any ball , choose a rational cube with . Then . Taking the supremum over these balls gives , hence also .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the equivalence together with the comparable bounds and for one and the same dimensional constant (renaming constants if necessary), and each direction was proved both for and for , so the centred and uncentred forms of condition (1) are equivalent to (2). Therefore the cube-average/essential-infimum condition defines the same class as a.e., with characteristic changed only by dimensional factors.
Depends on
- Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights
- Ball and cube maximal functions are pointwise comparable
- The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions
- The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure
- Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure
- $\mathbb{Q}^n$ is a countable dense subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, and rational open boxes form a countable basis
- Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w)
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- The A₁ range of a power weight Example
- Aₚ weights are doubling Lemma
- Distribution decay from maximal cubes for Aₚ weights Lemma
- Duality and nesting of the Aₚ classes Lemma
- Weighted average comparison and the density-to-mass estimate for Aₚ weights Lemma
- Weighted weak (1,1) bound for the maximal function under A₁ Lemma
- Reverse Holder self-improvement for Aₚ weights Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (Springer GTM 249, 2014) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juha Kinnunen, Harmonic Analysis (Aalto University lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)