How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Alexander trick: a sphere homeomorphism extends radially over the disk
Statement
Let and let be a homeomorphism of the unit sphere . Then extends to a homeomorphism of the closed unit disk, given by The extension need not be smooth at the origin.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , a homeomorphism , and the closed unit disk with its Euclidean norm (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ).
The boundary map is a homeomorphism of ; hence it maps into itself, so for every , and both and its inverse are continuous (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ).
For every scalar and every one has , and exactly when (Inner products separate vectors, and the induced norm is homogeneous: ).
The radial normalisation , , is continuous, and (Radial normalisation is continuous on , Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ).
Proof
Every has a unique representation with and , namely and : taking norms in gives by [L1], and dividing by that positive number gives ; conversely and by [L3], so this pair is admissible, and in particular the prescription of the statement defines a function on .
For and one has by [F1] and [L1], so maps into , and lies in .
Define by and for , , which is a function by the same argument as step 1.1 with replaced by ; then and for all and , while both composites fix , so and and is a bijection with inverse .
Continuity of at : every satisfies whenever by [L1] and step 2.1, so is continuous at .
Continuity of at a point : writing , , , for gives by [L1] and bilinearity, hence because , because by [F1], and because by [L2]; given , continuity of at gives with whenever , and continuity of at ([L3]) gives with and whenever , so for all such and is continuous at .
The arguments of steps 3.2 and 3.3 used only that the boundary map is a continuous map and that its values lie in ; applying them with replaced by the continuous map of [F1] shows that the inverse of step 3.1 is continuous on .
Therefore is a continuous bijection with continuous inverse , that is a homeomorphism, and it restricts to on because for , which proves the extension claim.
Remarks
Why smoothness can fail. Suppose is differentiable at with derivative (in the sense of the derivative as a linear map). For every and every one has , so and therefore : the boundary map is itself the restriction of the linear map . Consequently, for a homeomorphism of that is not the restriction of a linear map, the radial extension is not differentiable at the origin and in particular is not smooth there. Such homeomorphisms exist for every : for the map is strictly increasing (its derivative is positive) and commutes with translation by , so it descends to a homeomorphism of the circle , and is a rotation or a reflection only for . For , write a sphere point as with and apply this angular map to , leaving fixed. At the map and its inverse extend continuously because the first two coordinates have norm ; on it is the same nonlinear circle map, so it cannot be the restriction of a linear map. Thus the extension is not automatically smooth at the origin, which is why it is used only as a topological gluing map in the applications below. Milnor's treatment of the two-disk argument likewise uses the radial extension as a homeomorphism only (Milnor, Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem, section 9, printed pp. 109-110).
Depends on
- Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Radial normalisation $x\mapsto x/\lVert x\rVert_2$ is continuous on $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus\{0\}$
- Inner products separate vectors, and the induced norm is homogeneous: $\lVert\lambda v\rVert=|\lambda|\lVert v\rVert$
- The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for $n \ge 1$ every norm $N$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ satisfies $N(x) \le C\lVert x\rVert_1$ and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for $d_2$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor, Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem, section 9, printed pp. 109-110 (standard reference, not scraped)