Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Alexander trick: a sphere homeomorphism extends radially over the disk

Statement

Let d≥1 and let f:Sd−1→Sd−1 be a homeomorphism of the unit sphere Sd−1⊆Rd. Then f extends to a homeomorphism F:Dd→Dd of the closed unit disk, given by F(0)=0,F(rx)=r f(x)for 0<r≤1, x∈Sd−1. The extension need not be smooth at the origin.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer d≥1, a homeomorphism f:Sd−1→Sd−1, and the closed unit disk Dd:=B‾2(0,1)⊆Rd with its Euclidean norm ∥⋅∥=∥⋅∥2 (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn).

[F1]

The boundary map f is a homeomorphism of Sd−1; hence it maps Sd−1 into itself, so ∥f(x)∥=1 for every x∈Sd−1, and both f and its inverse f−1 are continuous (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn).

[L1]

For every scalar λ and every v∈Rd one has ∥λv∥=∣λ∣ ∥v∥, and ∥x∥=1 exactly when x∈Sd−1 (Inner products separate vectors, and the induced norm is homogeneous: ∥λv∥=∣λ∣∥v∥).

[L3]

The radial normalisation ρ:Rd∖{0}→Sd−1, ρ(y)=y/∥y∥, is continuous, and Dd={y∈Rd:∥y∥≤1} (Radial normalisation x↦x/∥x∥2 is continuous on Rn∖{0}, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1L3given

Every y∈Dd∖{0} has a unique representation y=rx with 0<r≤1 and x∈Sd−1, namely r=∥y∥ and x=ρ(y): taking norms in y=rx gives r=∥y∥ by [L1], and dividing by that positive number gives x=ρ(y); conversely ∥y∥≤1 and ρ(y)∈Sd−1 by [L3], so this pair is admissible, and in particular the prescription of the statement defines a function F on Dd.

2.1step 1.1F1L1

For r∈(0,1] and x∈Sd−1 one has ∥F(rx)∥=∥rf(x)∥=r∥f(x)∥=r≤1 by [F1] and [L1], so F maps Dd into Dd, and F(0)=0 lies in Dd.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1given

Define G:Dd→Dd by G(0)=0 and G(ry)=r f−1(y) for 0<r≤1, y∈Sd−1, which is a function by the same argument as step 1.1 with f replaced by f−1; then G(F(rx))=G(rf(x))=r f−1(f(x))=rx and F(G(ry))=F(rf−1(y))=r f(f−1(y))=ry for all r∈(0,1] and x,y∈Sd−1, while both composites fix 0, so G∘F=idDd and F∘G=idDd and F is a bijection with inverse G.

3.2step 2.1L1

Continuity of F at 0: every ε>0 satisfies ∥F(y)−F(0)∥=∥F(y)∥=∥y∥<ε whenever ∥y−0∥<ε by [L1] and step 2.1, so F is continuous at 0.

3.3step 1.1step 2.1F1L1L2L3

Continuity of F at a point y0≠0: writing r=∥y∥, r0=∥y0∥, x=ρ(y), x0=ρ(y0) for y≠0 gives F(y)−F(y0)=r(f(x)−f(x0))+(r−r0)f(x0) by [L1] and bilinearity, hence ∥F(y)−F(y0)∥≤∥f(x)−f(x0)∥+∥y−y0∥ because r≤1, because ∥f(x0)∥=1 by [F1], and because ∣r−r0∣≤∥y−y0∥ by [L2]; given ε>0, continuity of f at x0 gives η>0 with ∥f(x)−f(x0)∥<ε/2 whenever ∥x−x0∥<η, and continuity of ρ at y0 ([L3]) gives δ>0 with ∥ρ(y)−ρ(y0)∥<η and ∥y−y0∥<ε/2 whenever 0<∥y−y0∥<δ, so ∥F(y)−F(y0)∥<ε for all such y and F is continuous at y0.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3F1given

The arguments of steps 3.2 and 3.3 used only that the boundary map is a continuous map Sd−1→Sd−1 and that its values lie in Sd−1; applying them with f replaced by the continuous map f−1 of [F1] shows that the inverse G of step 3.1 is continuous on Dd.

5.1step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3step 4.1∎

Therefore F:Dd→Dd is a continuous bijection with continuous inverse G, that is a homeomorphism, and it restricts to f on Sd−1 because F(1⋅x)=f(x) for x∈Sd−1, which proves the extension claim.

Remarks

Why smoothness can fail. Suppose F is differentiable at 0 with derivative A (in the sense of the derivative as a linear map). For every x∈Sd−1 and every t∈(0,1] one has F(tx)=tf(x), so ∥F(tx)−A(tx)∥t=∥f(x)−Ax∥→t→0+ 0, and therefore f(x)=Ax: the boundary map is itself the restriction of the linear map A. Consequently, for a homeomorphism f of Sd−1 that is not the restriction of a linear map, the radial extension F is not differentiable at the origin and in particular is not smooth there. Such homeomorphisms exist for every d≥2: for 0<ε<1 the map θ↦θ+εsin⁡θ is strictly increasing (its derivative 1+εcos⁡θ is positive) and commutes with translation by 2π, so it descends to a homeomorphism fε of the circle S1, and fε is a rotation or a reflection only for ε=0. For d>2, write a sphere point as (rcos⁡θ,rsin⁡θ,z) with z∈Rd−2 and apply this angular map to θ, leaving r,z fixed. At r=0 the map and its inverse extend continuously because the first two coordinates have norm r; on z=0 it is the same nonlinear circle map, so it cannot be the restriction of a linear map. Thus the extension is not automatically smooth at the origin, which is why it is used only as a topological gluing map in the applications below. Milnor's treatment of the two-disk argument likewise uses the radial extension as a homeomorphism only (Milnor, Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem, section 9, printed pp. 109-110).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources