Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Arbitrary-framing A1 varieties and their conormal Hecke correspondence

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix W=Cw, w≥0, and the no-arrow one-vertex quiver. For 0≤v≤w, stable data are I:W→V, J:V→W, dim⁡V=v, with IJ=0 and J injective; g∈GL⁡(V) acts by (gI,Jg−1). This extends the w=1 convention in A one-vertex framed quiver variety and its Hecke correspondence. The algebraic orbit space is Mv=T∗Xv={(S,A):S∈Xv=Gr⁡(v,W), im⁡A⊆S⊆ker⁡A}, under S=im⁡J, A=JI. Put av=v(w−v), so dim⁡Xv=av, dim⁡Mv=2av. The map μv:Mv→End⁡(W), (S,A)↦A, is projective; its zero fiber Lv=Xv is the zero section.

For 0≤v<w, put Yv=Fl⁡(v,v+1;W) and write q:Yv→Xv, r:Yv→Xv+1. The framed subdatum Hecke locus is Zv={(S⊂T,A):im⁡A⊆S, T⊆ker⁡A}=Tot⁡Kv,Kv=Hom⁡(W/T,S). Its image in Mv×Mv+1 uses the same A in both factors. It is the conormal bundle to Yv⊂Xv×Xv+1 after applying fiberwise negation in the second cotangent factor. Both projections are projective, dim⁡Zv=av+av+1, and Zv∩pr⁡1−1(Lv)=Yv=Zv∩pr⁡2−1(Lv+1) scheme-theoretically. All these constructions are GL⁡(W)-equivariant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The vector spaces, stable data, group actions and incidence spaces in the statement, over C.

[F1]

Grassmannian charts are graphs of maps S→W/S, so their tangent bundle is Hom⁡(S,W/S); Grassmannians are smooth irreducible projective of dimension v(w−v) (The Grassmannian of r-dimensional subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space, Standard affine charts on the Grassmannian, The Grassmannian is smooth, irreducible, and has dimension r(n-r)).

[F2]

The quotient projective bundle represents line quotients (Projective bundle represents line quotients).

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Stability and IJ=0 give S=im⁡J of dimension v and A=JI with image in S and A∣S=0. Conversely such (S,A) and a frame j:V→∼S give J=j followed by inclusion and I=j−1A. These constructions are inverse and algebraic on the graph charts [F1]; changing the frame is exactly the free GL⁡(V) action. The stable locus is therefore the frame bundle over the displayed vector bundle, proving the algebraic geometric quotient claim, without an appeal to an unspecified GIT quotient. Trace identifies the dual of Hom⁡(S,W/S) with Hom⁡(W/S,S), yielding Mv=T∗Xv.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The incidence equations A(W)⊆S, A(S)=0 cut out a closed subscheme of Xv×End⁡(W). Projection from this product is projective, hence so is μv. Its fiber at 0 is the zero section scheme, and A2=0 everywhere. This agrees with the zero fiber of the affine invariant quotient of the framed data if that quotient is also used: its invariant functions include all entries of JI, so the zero fiber forces A=0; conversely at I=0 the orbit closure under g=t−1id⁡V contains the zero datum as t→0, so every invariant function has its zero-datum value. Thus no assertion identifying the entire affine invariant ring is needed.

2.2F1F2step 1.1algebra

A framed inclusion V↪V+ requires I+=ξI and J=J+ξ, with the identity on W. In the quotient model it is exactly S⊂T and a common A satisfying A(W)⊂S, A(T)=0; conversely these conditions reconstruct the inclusion and its unframed one-dimensional quotient. They describe the vector bundle Kv of rank k=v(w−v−1) on Yv. The map r is the quotient projective bundle of the tautological rank-(v+1) bundle on Xv+1, with fiber Pv; q is the bundle of lines in W/S, with fiber Pw−v−1. Hence dim⁡Yv=av+1+v=av+w−v−1 and dim⁡Zv=dim⁡Yv+k=av+av+1.

3.1F1step 2.2algebra

A tangent vector to the flag incidence is induced by some ξ∈End⁡(W), since adapted bases identify the incidence with a transitive GL⁡(W) orbit. Cotangent vectors (A1,A2) annihilate every such tangent vector exactly when tr⁡((A1+A2)ξ)=0 for all ξ, that is A2=−A1. Together with the two cotangent conditions this says im⁡A1⊂S, A1(T)=0. This identifies the conormal fibers, with the asserted sign in the second factor, and the same linear equations identify vector bundles on every chart. In particular Zv is smooth and closed in the product. For the first projection, Zv is a closed subvariety of Mv×Xv+1 cut out by S⊂T⊂ker⁡A; for the second it is closed in Xv×Mv+1 cut out by im⁡A⊂S⊂T. Both are projective projections. Setting either source or target A to zero cuts all fiber coordinates of Kv, so both inverse images of zero sections are exactly Yv with its reduced zero-section scheme structure.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

An element h∈GL⁡(W) acts on data by (I,J)↦(Ih−1,hJ) and on the quotient by (S,A)↦(hS,hAh−1). It acts on flags and on Hom⁡(W/T,S) by the same transport. The frame quotient, trace pairing, incidence equations and all projections commute with these actions. This proves the equivariance assertions, including the conormal sign identification. The inherited Axiom of Choice supplies bases; the actual chart computations use only finite-dimensional choices.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources