How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Adapted resolvent-trace martingale concentration for independent columns
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, and let all random vectors below be defined on one common probability space. For each positive integer , let be a positive integer, let be independent random vectors in , let , and let with fixed and . Define If for some , then almost surely. More precisely, for every ,
Statement references
Bai and Silverstein, Chapter 3, §3.3, printed pp. 53–55 (complete book PDF).
Junyi Liao, Chapter 2, §2.1.3, printed pp. 35–38 (complete lecture notes).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the common probability space, the positive integers , the independent column vectors , and the fixed parameter with .
The Axiom of Choice states every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
For a real symmetric non-negative matrix, adding one rank-one matrix changes the unnormalized resolvent trace by at most (Rank-one resolvent update and trace bound for a positive semidefinite matrix).
For independent random elements and a real measurable function whose change under replacement of coordinate is at most , the two-sided McDiarmid bound is (McDiarmid bounded-differences inequality).
If , then almost surely only finitely many occur (First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events).
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and notation of the Statement, including AC and the common probability space.
Fix all vectors except . Replacing that vector by another vector changes by removing and adding . Applying [F1] once to remove the first term and once to add the second shows that changes by at most . Hence each of the real and imaginary parts of has coordinate oscillation at most .
Apply [F2] separately to and . If a complex number has modulus greater than , at least one of its real or imaginary parts has magnitude greater than . The union bound therefore gives This is the stated estimate.
Since , for each fixed the exponent in step 2.1 is at most for all sufficiently large , for some . The probabilities are therefore summable.
Apply [F3] to the events in step 3.1 for each , , and intersect the resulting countable collection of probability-one events. On that event .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bai and Silverstein, Spectral Analysis of Large Dimensional Random Matrices, 2nd ed., Chapter 3, §3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Junyi Liao, Random Matrix Theory, Chapter 2, §2.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)