Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Marchenko–Pastur formula defines a probability law with the fixed-point transform

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

For every γ>0, the set function μγ in the definition of the Marchenko–Pastur measure is a Borel probability measure supported on [0,∞). For every z∈C with η:=Im⁡z>0, its Stieltjes transform mγ(z) satisfies 1+zmγ(z)=mγ(z)1+γmγ(z),Im⁡(1−γ−z−γzmγ(z))≤−η.

Statement references

Bai and Silverstein, Chapter 3, §3.3, printed pp. 52–58 (complete book PDF).

Junyi Liao, Theorem 2.1 and Lemmas 2.5–2.6, printed pp. 29–35 (complete lecture notes).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, γ>0, the endpoints a=(1−γ)2, b=(1+γ)2, and the formula defining μγ.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice supplies a choice function for each countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The set function is the density (b−x)(x−a)/(2πγx) on (a,b) with an atom (1−1/γ)+ at zero (Marchenko–Pastur measure with aspect ratio gamma).

[F2]

The identity theorem says holomorphic functions on a connected open set that agree on a set with an interior limit point agree throughout that set (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).

[F3]

Dominated convergence allows limits of integrands bounded by one integrable function to pass through the integral (Dominated convergence).

[F4]

Integrating a nonnegative measurable function over measurable sets defines a measure (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure).

[F5]

Under countable choice, Lebesgue measure on R is a measure, and every Borel subset of R is Lebesgue measurable; hence the Borel density used below is measurable for Lebesgue measure (Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable).

Proof

Given: Countable choice, the parameters, and the formula in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F4F5algebraconstruct

Put B=2γ, A0=1+γ, and x(θ)=A0+Bcos⁡θ for 0<θ<π. This substitution maps (0,π) onto (a,b) in reverse order, with (b−x)(x−a)=Bsin⁡θ and ∣dx∣=Bsin⁡θ dθ. Thus the continuous part of μγ becomes (2/π)sin⁡2θ dθ/x(θ). For real A>B, the substitution t=tan⁡(θ/2) gives ∫0πdθA+Bcos⁡θ=2∫0∞dt(A+B)+(A−B)t2=πA2−B2. Write I0(A)=∫0π(A+Bcos⁡θ)−1dθ=π/A2−B2. Since ∫0πcos⁡θ dθ=0 and cos⁡θ/(A+Bcos⁡θ)=B−1−A/[B(A+Bcos⁡θ)], I1(A):=∫0πcos⁡θA+Bcos⁡θdθ=πB−ABI0(A),I2(A):=∫0πcos⁡2θA+Bcos⁡θdθ=−ABI1(A)=−AπB2+A2B2I0(A). Therefore J(A):=∫0πsin⁡2θA+Bcos⁡θ dθ=I0(A)−I2(A)=π(A−A2−B2)B2. For A=A0>B, the root is ∣1−γ∣; if γ=1, direct cancellation sin⁡2θ/(2+2cos⁡θ)=(1−cos⁡θ)/2 gives the same value by continuity. Hence the continuous mass is 2J(A0)/π=(A0−∣1−γ∣)/(2γ)=min⁡(1,γ)/γ. Adding (1−1/γ)+ gives total mass one. Define fγ(x):=(b−x)(x−a)/(2πγx) for a<x<b and fγ(x):=0 otherwise. This is nonnegative and Borel measurable, and has finite integral by the calculation above. By [F5], fγ is Lebesgue measurable. By [F4], A↦∫Afγ dλ is a finite Borel measure; the nonnegative multiple (1−1/γ)+δ0 is a finite measure as well. Their sum is the displayed set function, so it is a Borel probability measure supported on [0,∞).

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For w=reiθ∈C∖(−∞,0], with r>0 and −π<θ<π, define q0(w)=r eiθ/2. This is continuous, satisfies q0(w)2=w, and is holomorphic: for h→0 with w+h in the slit plane, q0(w+h)−q0(w)h=1q0(w+h)+q0(w)⟶12q0(w). Set Ω=C∖(−∞,B] and q(A)=q0(A−B)q0(A+B) for A∈Ω. Both factors are defined and holomorphic there, q(A)2=A2−B2, and q(A)>0 for real A>B. The domain is connected: each A−B=reiθ with −π<θ<π can be joined inside it to B+1 by continuously changing r to 1 and θ to 0. The integral J(A) is holomorphic on Ω. Indeed, on any compact subset its denominator is bounded away from zero, and the difference quotient of its integrand tends pointwise to −sin⁡2θ/(A+Bcos⁡θ)2 with a uniform integrable bound; [F3] justifies passing that limit through the integral. The identity theorem [F2] extends the formula from real A>B (which has limit points inside Ω) to all A∈Ω. In particular it applies to Az=A0−z, whose imaginary part is negative.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Let q=(1+γ−z)2−4γ on that branch. The substitution in step 1.1 and 1/[x(x−z)]=z−1((x−z)−1−x−1) give the transform of the continuous part as [(Az−q)−(A0−∣1−γ∣)]/(2γz). Adding the atom contributes −(1−1/γ)+/z; simplifying in the cases γ≤1 and γ>1 gives mγ(z)=1−γ−z−q2γz. Since q2=(1−γ−z)2−4γz, substitution verifies γzmγ(z)2+(z+γ−1)mγ(z)+1=0, Since step 1.1 gives a probability measure, Im⁡mγ(z)=∫η/∣x−z∣2 dμγ(x)>0. Thus 1+γmγ(z)≠0, and rearranging the quadratic gives the fixed-point equation in the Statement.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

For x≥0, Im⁡(z/(x−z))=ηx/∣x−z∣2≥0. Integrating this identity against the probability measure from step 1.1 gives Im⁡(zmγ(z))≥0, so Im⁡(1−γ−z−γzmγ(z))=−η−γIm⁡(zmγ(z))≤−η.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Marchenko–Pastur measure with aspect ratio gamma.

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources