Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lepski scale selection transfers fixed-scale covariance bounds

Statement

Let Σ≠0, σ0>0, m≥1, β>1 and 0<σmin⁡≤σ0≤σmax⁡. Use the finite grid and agreement rule of Adaptive truncated covariance estimator, with measurable matrix estimates on that grid. Put Lg=log⁡2(2σmax⁡/σmin⁡),J={0,…,⌈Lg⌉−1},jˉ=⌈log⁡2(σ0/σmin⁡)⌉,N+=⌈Lg⌉−jˉ. On any event on which every j≥jˉ satisfies ∥Σ^j−Σ∥≤3σjβ/m, the selected estimate satisfies ∥Σ^∗−Σ∥<18σ0β/m. If the individual failures are at most qj, its success probability is at least 1−∑j≥jˉqj. For the prescribed same-sample estimator, when the hypotheses of Fixed-scale matrix-truncated covariance deviation under finite matrix variance hold at every required scale, its individual failure bounds qj=5pe−β give success probability at least 1−5p⌈Lg⌉e−β. The shared-event bound below counts the common pilot failure once.

More sharply, suppose a common event E has P(Ec)≤δ, and for each j≥jˉ an event Gj has P(Gjc)≤he−β, with the stated fixed-scale bound valid on E∩Gj. Then success is at least 1−δ−hN+e−β. No independence between scales or the pilot and covariance estimates is required. The exact grid cardinality is ⌈Lg⌉, not the generally false unrounded bound ∣J∣≤Lg.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bracket, positive finite grid scales, matrix estimates and deterministic agreement rule in the statement, with the stated probability assumptions when invoked.

[F1]

The scale grid is σj=2jσmin⁡; the agreement rule selects the smallest index whose estimate is within 6σkβ/m of every larger-scale estimate. Adaptive truncated covariance estimator.

[F2]

The finite agreement rule has a valid index since its largest grid index satisfies every comparison vacuously. The adaptive truncated covariance procedure is well-defined on its declared domain.

[F3]

Under its trace-aware sample condition, the prescribed pilot in Fixed-scale matrix-truncated covariance deviation under finite matrix variance has fixed-scale failure probability at most 5pe−β for each scale σ≥σ0.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The grid condition is 0≤j<Lg, so it has exactly ⌈Lg⌉ elements. The first scale at or above σ0 is jˉ, and σjˉ<2σ0≤2σmax⁡ puts it in the grid. Thus exactly N+ required scales are j≥jˉ, with N+≥1.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

On the joint fixed-scale event, for every k>jˉ the triangle inequality gives ∥Σ^k−Σ^jˉ∥≤3(σk+σjˉ)β/m≤6σkβ/m. Hence jˉ is admissible and the selected j∗≤jˉ. If they differ, the selection rule gives ∥Σ^j∗−Σ^jˉ∥≤6σjˉβ/m; if equal this distance is zero. Adding the error at jˉ yields ∥Σ^∗−Σ∥≤9σjˉβ/m<18σ0β/m.

3.1F3givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

A finite union bound costs at most ∑j≥jˉqj for individual failure bounds; under [F3], qj=5pe−β gives the stated 5p⌈Lg⌉e−β bound. For a shared event E, the complement of E∩⋂j≥jˉGj has probability at most δ+hN+e−β; the common failure is counted once. Applying step 2.1 proves all probability assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources