How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lepski scale selection transfers fixed-scale covariance bounds
Statement
Let , , , and . Use the finite grid and agreement rule of Adaptive truncated covariance estimator, with measurable matrix estimates on that grid. Put On any event on which every satisfies , the selected estimate satisfies . If the individual failures are at most , its success probability is at least . For the prescribed same-sample estimator, when the hypotheses of Fixed-scale matrix-truncated covariance deviation under finite matrix variance hold at every required scale, its individual failure bounds give success probability at least . The shared-event bound below counts the common pilot failure once.
More sharply, suppose a common event has , and for each an event has , with the stated fixed-scale bound valid on . Then success is at least . No independence between scales or the pilot and covariance estimates is required. The exact grid cardinality is , not the generally false unrounded bound .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The bracket, positive finite grid scales, matrix estimates and deterministic agreement rule in the statement, with the stated probability assumptions when invoked.
The scale grid is ; the agreement rule selects the smallest index whose estimate is within of every larger-scale estimate. Adaptive truncated covariance estimator.
The finite agreement rule has a valid index since its largest grid index satisfies every comparison vacuously. The adaptive truncated covariance procedure is well-defined on its declared domain.
Under its trace-aware sample condition, the prescribed pilot in Fixed-scale matrix-truncated covariance deviation under finite matrix variance has fixed-scale failure probability at most for each scale .
Proof
The grid condition is , so it has exactly elements. The first scale at or above is , and puts it in the grid. Thus exactly required scales are , with .
On the joint fixed-scale event, for every the triangle inequality gives . Hence is admissible and the selected . If they differ, the selection rule gives ; if equal this distance is zero. Adding the error at yields .
A finite union bound costs at most for individual failure bounds; under [F3], gives the stated bound. For a shared event , the complement of has probability at most ; the common failure is counted once. Applying step 2.1 proves all probability assertions.
Depends on
- Adaptive truncated covariance estimator
- The adaptive truncated covariance procedure is well-defined on its declared domain
- Fixed-scale matrix-truncated covariance deviation under finite matrix variance
- The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||
- Matrix variance for covariance estimation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stanislav Minsker and Xiaohan Wei, Estimation of the Covariance Structure of Heavy-Tailed Distributions, Theorem 2.1 and §4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)