Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed-scale matrix-truncated covariance deviation under finite matrix variance

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the specified geometric-median pilot. Let Xi∈Rp, 1≤i≤m, be iid with mean μ, nonzero covariance Σ, finite fourth central moment and matrix variance σ02 as in Matrix variance for covariance estimation. Put L=∥Σ∥op,T=tr⁡Σ,d=σ02/L2,D=max⁡{d,(T/σ0)2}. For σ≥σ0, β>1 set t=β/m, θ=t/σ and Σ^θ=1mθ∑iψ ⁣(θ(Xi−μ^)(Xi−μ^)T). For any measurable pilot, any B≥0 and any event E on which ∥μ^−μ∥≤B, there is an event G with P(Gc)≤hpe−β, hp=(3p+1)/2, such that on E∩G, ∥Σ^θ−Σ∥op≤a0σt+qM+2B(W+qM)+B2, where a0=27/10, q=2Bθ+B2θ, M=L+a0σt and W=σ0θ+2Tt+8t/(3θ). The concentration event is constructed from the true centered observations and the inequality is uniform over the pilot ball; no independence of the pilot and sample is assumed.

For the exact pilot of Adaptive truncated covariance estimator, the explicit sufficient sample condition m≥1016Dβ therefore gives P ⁣(∥Σ^θ−Σ∥op>3σβ/m)≤(hp+1)e−β≤5pe−β. Every finite-fourth-moment law is retained under this trace-aware sample condition; no coordinate independence or bounded-kurtosis assumption is added. If the mean is supplied exactly, the stronger bound 2.7σβ/m holds with failure at most pe−β for every m≥1, without the D sample condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The iid sample, matrix moments, scales, confidence and stated pilot/event conventions. The probability factor p denotes ambient dimension, whereas d is an intrinsic moment ratio.

[F1]

With Zi=Xi−μ, w(z)=min⁡{1,1/(θ∥z∥2)}, w(0)=1, the oracle matrices S=m−1∑iw(Zi)ZiZiT and vectors V=m−1∑iw(Zi)Zi obey ∥S−Σ∥≤a0σt and ∥V∥≤W, except on events of probability pe−β and (p+1)e−β/2, respectively. Oracle-truncated covariance and vector concentration under finite matrix variance.

[F2]

The specified balanced-block geometric-median pilot has radius 112Tβ/m with failure at most e−β whenever k=⌊3.5β⌋+1≤m/2. Exact block budget for the covariance geometric-median pilot.

[F3]

For nonzero covariance the intrinsic ratio d≥1. The covariance matrix variance ratio is at least one.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Intersect the two oracle events [F1], at cost hpe−β. Put R=1/θ and wu(z)=min⁡{1,R/∥z−u∥2}, interpreted as one at z=u. For ∥u∥≤B, the ratio hu(z)=wu(z)/w(z)=max⁡(R,∥z∥2)/max⁡(R,∥z−u∥2) lies in [(1+B/R)−2,(1+B/R)2]. Indeed max⁡(R,∥z∥)≤max⁡(R,∥z−u∥)+B, and the reverse follows by swapping the two vectors. Thus ∣hu−1∣≤q=2Bθ+B2θ.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Expand Su=m−1∑iwu(Zi)(Zi−u)(Zi−u)T. The perturbation of its ZiZiT part has norm at most q∥S∥, because its scalar coefficients have absolute value at most q and the summands are positive semidefinite. For the cross vector, scalar Cauchy–Schwarz and w2≤w give ∥m−1∑i(hu−1)w(Zi)Zi∥≤q∥S∥. Hence ∥Su−Σ∥≤∥S−Σ∥+q∥S∥+2B(∥V∥+q∥S∥)+B2, since 0≤wu≤1. This bound is pointwise for every u in the ball, so it applies to the random same-sample u=μ^−μ on E, without conditioning on it. The first conclusion follows using ∥S∥≤M and [F1].

3.1givenF1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

For the prescribed pilot take B=112Tt<16Tt. The condition m≥1016Dβ and [F3] imply k≤4.5β≤m/2, so [F2] applies. By homogeneity, replace Z by Z/L and σ by σ/L: then T,σ0,σ scale by 1/L, θ by L, S,Σ by 1/L, and D is unchanged. It therefore suffices to normalize by L so L=1, T=ρ, σ0=d and σ≥d≥1. Put η=Dt≤10−16 and H=σt. Using D≥d, ρ2/d≤D and t≤η≤1, direct substitution gives B2/H≤256η, B/H≤16η1/4 and q≤288η1/4t. Therefore qM/H≤1066η1/4 and 2BqM/H≤18432η: indeed qM/H≤288η1/4H(1+2710H)/σ, and H≤σ, σ≥1 give H(1+2710H)/σ2≤σ(1+2710σ)/σ2≤3710<4, hence the square-root factor is at most 37/10<2. The three terms in 2BW/H are at most 32η1/4, 64η and 86η1/4, respectively: use Bσ0θ/H≤16η1/4, ρt/σ≤η and Bt/(θH)≤16η1/4. In total the perturbation beyond 2710H is at most 1184η1/4+18752η≤118588106<310. Step 2.1 is thus strictly below 3H. Undo the normalization and add the single pilot failure to obtain (hp+1)e−β≤5pe−β. For known mean, u=B=0 and only the oracle matrix event is needed, proving the last assertion.

Remarks

The sufficient condition Dβ replaces a false general dβ claim; Intrinsic matrix variance alone does not control pilot-centered covariance truncation ↗ gives an explicit counterexample to that original estimator guarantee. Under a separately proved extra relation tr⁡Σ≤dL, one has D=d, recovering that sample-size regime. The auxiliary comparison cannot be assumed for arbitrary dependence. The uniform pilot formula above can be sharper than this sufficient sample condition when a pilot has a better separately established accuracy bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources