Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Intrinsic matrix variance alone does not control pilot-centered covariance truncation

Statement refuted

There is a universal C such that every clean iid finite-fourth-moment law with nonzero covariance, intrinsic matrix-variance ratio d=σ02/∥Σ∥op2 and m≥Cdβ has the following guarantees for the same-sample geometric-median pilot procedure: the fixed-scale error is at most 3σβ/m, with failure at most 5de−β, and the adaptive error is at most 18σ0β/m, with failure at most 5dlog⁡2(2σmax⁡/σmin⁡)e−β. Even replacing the failure prefactor d by ambient dimension p does not make the Cdβ sample condition sufficient in general.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice for the specified minimum-norm pilot; a proposed universal C; the exact prescribed procedure and any deterministic balanced blocks.

[F1]

The covariance algorithm uses the geometric median of its balanced block means, rank-one radial truncation with ψ(t)=min⁡(t,1) for t≥0, and a fixed dyadic scale grid. Adaptive truncated covariance estimator.

[F2]

For a centered vector, covariance is Σ=E[XXT]. Covariance matrix of a finite-dimensional random vector.

[F3]

Matrix variance is σ02=∥E[∥X∥2XXT]∥op. Matrix variance for covariance estimation.

Counterexample

1.1givenF2F3algebraconstruct

Fix β=10, so k=36, and choose a fixed integer m arbitrarily large with m≥2Cβ, bmin⁡=⌊m/k⌋≥2, k(2/3)bmin⁡<1/100 and 182β/m<1/2. For each p≥2, set λ1=1, λj=p−1/2 for j≥2, Sp=∑jλj2=2−1/p, and qj=λj2/Sp. Let X take ±λj/qj ej, each with probability qj/2. It is centered and finitely supported. Direct summation gives Σp=diag⁡(λj), ∥Σp∥op=1, E[∥X∥2XXT]=SpIp and σ02=d=Sp<2. Thus m≥Cdβ for all p, but tr⁡Σp→∞. Tail-axis observations j≥2 have common squared radius Rp2=Spp.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Let Ep be the event that every block contains at least one tail-axis draw and that all sampled tail axes are distinct. A block has no tail draw with probability (1/Sp)bj; conditional tail-axis labels are uniform on p−1 coordinates. Union bounds give P(Ep)≥1−k(1/Sp)bmin⁡−m(m−1)/(2(p−1))>49/50 for large p. Every geometric median of finite points lies in their convex hull: if x lies outside that compact hull and z is a closest hull point, differentiating the squared distance along the segment from z to any hull point q gives ⟨x−z,q−z⟩≤0. Expanding the square then gives ∥x−q∥2≥∥x−z∥2+∥z−q∥2>∥z−q∥2, so replacing x by z strictly reduces every summand, contradicting median minimality. Write therefore μ^=∑lwlMl with wl≥0, ∑lwl=1. On Ep the tail parts of the block means have disjoint supports and norms at least Rp/bmax⁡, where bmax⁡=⌈m/k⌉. Thus ∥μ^tail∥2≥Rp2∑lwl2/bmax⁡2≥Rp2/(kbmax⁡2), and ∣μ^1∣≤Sp.

3.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For an axis-one sample, ∥Xi−μ^∥2≥∥μ^tail∥2. For a tail draw in block l, its unique tail coordinate in the pilot is exactly wl/bl times its sample coordinate, so the difference has magnitude at least Rp(1−wl/bl)≥Rp/2. Hence uniformly in i, ∥Xi−μ^∥2≥cmRp2, with cm=min⁡{1/(kbmax⁡2),1/4}>0, whereas ∣(Xi−μ^)1∣≤2Sp. Choose the exact scale bracket σmin⁡=σmax⁡=σ0=Sp. Its grid is {0}, so adaptive and fixed-scale estimates coincide. With θ=σ0−1β/m, all centered samples are clipped for large p, and their rank-one formula gives e1TΣ^e1≤4Sp/(θcmRp2)=4/(θcmp)→0. The true entry is one, so operator error exceeds 1/2 on Ep eventually. Both claimed thresholds are below 1/2 by step 1.1, whereas their claimed failure budget is 5de−10<10e−10<1/1000. This contradicts P(Ep)>49/50. Since m was chosen after an arbitrary proposed C, no universal such C exists.

4.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

To obtain a nonvacuous contradiction even with the corrected ambient prefactor, let an integer b→∞ satisfy b≥C, and take βb=2b/2/100, kb=⌊(7/2)βb⌋+1, mb=kbb and pb=⌈eβb/2⌉. These satisfy βb>1 eventually, mb>(7/2)bβb≥Cdβb and balanced blocks all of size b. The no-tail-block error in step 2.1 is at most (9/2)βb(2/3)b=(9/200)(22/3)b→0; the collision error is O(βb2b2e−βb/2)→0. Here cmb=1/(kbb2) eventually and 1/θ=Spbkbb/βb=O(b). Thus the upper bound for the estimated leading entry in step 3.1 is O(βbb5/2e−βb/4)→0, whereas its true entry remains one. The larger advertised error radius is at most 184/(7b)→0, while 5pbe−βb≤10e−βb/2→0. Both failures therefore occur with probability tending to one even though the ambient-prefactor bound would require it to tend to zero. Each asserted vanishing follows since βb grows exponentially in b and e−cβb dominates every fixed power of βb,b; taking logarithms proves these limits directly. This also disproves the dimension-uniform source-shaped guarantee under only m≥Cdβ.

Remarks

The distinct two-axis counterexample Matrix variance need not dominate trace covariance times operator norm refutes the source's auxiliary trace comparison. This family proves failure of the unknown-mean estimator guarantee itself under only the intrinsic-ratio sample condition. It does not refute a correctly proved known-mean bound, a uniform pilot-accuracy interface, or a trace-aware sample requirement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources