Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An identity relative homotopy matrix permits cell cancellation

Statement

Let L⊂K be a connected finite CW pair with only relative cells in degrees n,n+1, where n≥3. If the triple boundary in the chosen free Z[π1L] homotopy bases is an identity matrix, then a finite sequence of elementary expansions and collapses relative to L carries (K,L) to (L,L). Equality of cellular incidence numbers is used through the relative homotopy boundary, never directly as a free-face condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-layer pair and identity matrix in the statement.

[F1]

The two relative homotopy groups have free group-ring bases on the cells and the triple boundary is represented by the relative cellular matrix (Two high relative cell layers have free homotopy bases and their cellular boundary matrix).

[F2]

Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations, so attaching-map homotopies extend over subsequently attached cells (Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations).

[F3]

An elementary expansion adds, and a collapse removes, a cell pair with a genuine specified free face (Elementary expansions and collapses of finite CW complexes).

[F4]

The long exact homotopy sequence of a pair identifies the kernel of πn(Kn)→πn(Kn,L) as the image of πn(L) and sends each relative characteristic disk to its attaching-sphere class in πn−1(L) (Long exact sequence of relative homotopy groups).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write Kn=L∪{e1n,…,ean}. For each lower characteristic class bj∈πn(Kn,L), the identity matrix supplies an upper class uj∈πn+1(K,Kn) with triple boundary δuj=bj. The composite πn+1(K,Kn)→δπn(Kn,L)→∂πn−1(L) is zero by exactness of the triple/pair boundary construction. Thus ∂bj=0: the attaching sphere of each lower cell is null-homotopic in L.

F1F4
2.1

Apply the finite homotopy-of-attaching-map collar of Cohen’s attaching-map comparison, printed p.23, to trivialize each lower attaching map, pushing upper maps along the induced deformation. This uses [F2] and [F3], and is the simplification established in Cell slides and stabilizations realize elementary group-ring matrices. The resulting lower skeleton has the form Kn=L∨⋁j=1aSjn, and the relative homotopy matrix is still the identity after transporting its characteristic bases.

F2F3step 1.1
3.1

The relative inclusion of the wedge L∨⋁Sjn has, in degree n, a split exact sequence πn(L)→πn(Kn)→πn(Kn,L)→0: retraction Kn→L splits the first map, and the constant lower attaching maps make the last boundary zero. A relative basis vector bj therefore has a spherical representative σj:Sn→Kn that maps a chosen n-disk homeomorphically through the characteristic disk of ejn and sends its complement to the basepoint in L. More generally, a class with zero jth relative coordinate has a representative avoiding the interior of ejn, since its R-linear sphere terms use only the other wedge summands and its residual term lies in πn(L).

F1F4step 2.1
4.1

Let φj:Sn→Kn be the attaching map of the jth upper cell. Its relative image is bj by the identity-matrix hypothesis, while σj has the same image. Exactness in step 3.1 gives [φj]−[σj]∈im⁡πn(L); represent this difference by a based sphere αj in L and pinch it into the complementary disk of σj. The resulting map σj+αj is homotopic to φj through maps to Kn and still maps one prescribed disk homeomorphically onto the lower jth cell with every other point outside that cell. This is the homotopy-level correction in Cohen’s identity-matrix cancellation, printed p.30.

F4step 3.1
5.1

For i≠j, the identity matrix gives zero jth relative coordinate to φi. By the last clause of step 3.1, homotope φi to an attaching map missing the interior of ejn. Replace the upper attaching maps by these homotopic representatives, one at a time, via finite collar expansions and collapses relative to Kn; [F2] transports subsequent attachments. Afterward ejn occurs in the boundary of exactly the corrected upper cell ejn+1, and the corrected φj meets it on one disk by a homeomorphism. It is now a genuine free face and [F3] removes the pair.

F2F3step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

The remaining pair still has only n- and (n+1)-cells, and its triple boundary in the remaining transported bases is the identity with row and column j deleted: the other corrected upper maps have no ejn term and the first upper map is gone. Induct on the finite common number a; for a=0 the pair already equals L, while step 5.1 reduces a by one. The finite concatenation of relative elementary moves proves the claim. ∎

F1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources