How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary expansions and collapses of finite CW complexes
Definition
Let be a finite CW complex and let . Write for the closed unit ball, for its boundary sphere, and for a closed upper hemisphere of .
An elementary expansion of of dimension is an inclusion of CW complexes together with a homeomorphism of ball pairs and a continuous map such that
- is a characteristic map for a new -cell ,
- is a characteristic map for a new -cell ,
- the remaining boundary is old: , and
- as a CW complex, with a subcomplex.
The new -cell is called the free face of the new -cell. The restriction of to maps its interior homeomorphically onto and maps its boundary into ; it need not be a homeomorphism onto the closed cell, whose attaching map may identify boundary points. The complementary boundary of maps into . In particular, an attachment of only one -cell to a complex already containing the alleged free face is not an elementary expansion under this definition.
We say that collapses to by an elementary collapse and write when is an elementary expansion; the elementary collapse is the inverse formal operation removing the pair . A finite sequence of elementary expansions and elementary collapses, each performed relative to the cells retained by the previous steps, is a formal deformation; when every cell of a subcomplex is retained throughout, the deformation is written relative to , and the operations are then said to fix the retained subcomplex. The one-cell case attaches a new vertex and a new edge joining it to an old vertex, the new vertex being the free face.
Depends on
Used by
- Simple homotopy equivalence Definition
- A free-face interval expansion has zero torsion Example
- An elementary CW expansion has zero Whitehead torsion Lemma
- An identity relative homotopy matrix permits cell cancellation Lemma
- Cell slides and stabilizations realize elementary group-ring matrices Lemma
- Cell trading puts a finite relative equivalence in two high degrees Lemma
- The target of a finite cellular mapping cylinder is a simple subcomplex Lemma
- Simple homotopy equivalences have zero torsion Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lück, §2.3, pp.34–35 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cohen, §7, pp.24–26 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Casson, Simple Homotopy Theory, §4, p.30 (standard reference, not scraped)