How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cw homotopy equivalence inclusions are strong deformation retracts
Statement
If is a CW subcomplex and its inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, then strongly deformation retracts onto . Moreover, if is a CW pair and are homotopic, then the adjunction spaces and are homotopy equivalent relative to their common subspace .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
If is a relative CW complex, then has the homotopy extension property; in particular it is a cofibration. (Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations)
Proof
First prove the relative inverse assertion: if is a homotopy equivalence, equals the identity on , and both inclusions have HEP, let be an inverse and . Extend over by HEP, starting at , to obtain with . CW inclusions have the needed HEP by F1.
Concatenate the homotopy for with for . It runs from to the identity, and on is a path followed by its reverse. Such a loop contracts relative to its endpoints: if its first-half path is , replace by . HEP for extends this homotopy of homotopies. Following the left, top, and right sides of the parameter square now gives relative to . This product HEP follows by taking the product of the HEP retraction with the other interval.
Repeat the preceding adjustment with and interchanged, obtaining fixed on with relative to . Then relative to , so relative to . Apply this result with the map : its relative inverse is a retraction, and the relative inverse homotopy is precisely a strong deformation retraction. If is empty, the existence of an inverse forces empty.
For a homotopy from to , use the common space . The CW prism retraction of onto fixes and descends to a strong deformation retraction of onto the first adjunction space, fixed on . The reversed prism gives the second retraction. These prism retractions can be built cellwise using radial projection of onto its bottom and sides; concatenate over dimensions with the CW weak topology, as in the HEP construction. Composing the two inclusions and retractions gives inverse homotopy equivalences relative to .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Propositions 0.18–0.19 and Corollary 0.20, complete proofs pp.16–17 (standard reference, not scraped)