How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite cw pairs admit finite simplicial homotopy models
Statement
Every finite CW pair is homotopy equivalent as a pair to a finite simplicial pair . In particular there are maps of pairs in both directions whose composites are homotopic to the identities through maps preserving the designated subspaces.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
For finite simplicial pairs and , every continuous map is homotopic through maps of pairs to a simplicial map for some . (Finite simplicial approximation for homology comparison)
If is a CW subcomplex and its inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, then strongly deformation retracts onto . Moreover, if is a CW pair and are homotopic, then the adjunction spaces and are homotopy equivalent relative to their common subspace . (Cw homotopy equivalence inclusions are strong deformation retracts)
Let be an abstract simplicial complex. Its geometric realization is the set of functions such that: 1. for all but finitely many ; 2. ; 3. the support is a simplex of . For each simplex of , write Sending to the barycentric tuple identifies with the geometric simplex spanned by the standard basis vectors indexed by , so carries its Euclidean simplex topology. We give the weak topology with respect to these simplex inclusions: a subset is declared open exactly when is open in for every simplex of . (The geometric realization of an abstract simplicial complex)
Proof
We first describe a finite simplicial replacement for the cylinder of a simplicial map . Start with and an edge from each vertex of to , using disjoint domain vertices. Having constructed the part over for a simplex with image face , adjoin the cone on with a fresh apex. This contains the subdivided simplex as the cone on its subdivided boundary. The base already retracts to the contractible simplex , so both base and cone are contractible; the inclusion is a CW homotopy equivalence and F2 gives a strong deformation retraction to the base. Attach these finite pieces along their specified faces. Fresh vertices and the shared face construction make the intersections exactly subcomplexes in the sense of F3.
Successively retract the cone pieces in decreasing dimension. The resulting retraction carries each domain simplex into its image face , so is homotopic there to by straight lines. Extend that endpoint adjustment over , fixed on , by the CW HEP used in F2. Thus the domain inclusion is homotopic in to with the prescribed endpoint. Adjoin a cone on the subdivided copy of ; the result is a finite simplicial complex. This construction does not assume the ordinary mapping cylinder itself is simplicial.
Here is the induction with subpairs retained. Begin with the finitely many vertices of , and adjoin its cells in increasing dimension. At each stage retain a common CW space having both the current CW space and its simplicial model as deformation retracts. Given finitely many new attaching maps , retract to and approximate simplicially by F1 after finitely many subdivisions of the sphere domains. For , just adjoin isolated vertices. For , adjoin the complexes to along . Each added subdivided sphere is homotopic in this common space to its original attaching map, by the old retraction homotopy, the simplicial approximation homotopy, and the cylinder homotopy just built.
For each of these homotopies glue along its boundary cylinder. The bottom contains the original attached cell, and the top contains the cone on the new sphere; the top simplicial space is over all the new cells. The prism retractions in F2 give deformation retractions to the two end adjunctions. The old retractions extend over an attaching disk by first extending the boundary homotopy over its collar; this is again the relative prism construction, fixed on the unaltered old end. Hence the new common space has both new ends as deformation retracts. This is a finite construction and preserves the earlier common subspace wherever no new cell is being attached.
After finishing , keep its common space and its two retracts and . Now repeat the same construction for the cells of in increasing dimension, with designated as the subspace throughout. The homotopies on are exactly its old retraction homotopies and remain within ; every prism newly attached for a cell outside leaves this designated subspace alone. Thus the final common pair retracts as a pair to and to a finite simplicial pair . Composing its retractions gives the required pair homotopy equivalence. Empty uses , and empty gives the empty simplicial pair.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Theorem 2C.5, construction and proof pp.182–184 (standard reference, not scraped)