How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite simplicial approximation for homology comparison
Statement
For finite simplicial pairs and , every continuous map is homotopic through maps of pairs to a simplicial map for some .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let and be abstract simplicial complexes. A function is a simplicial map if is a simplex of whenever is a simplex of . The geometric realization of is the map defined by Because has finite support, the sum is finite. The support of is contained in , so it is again a simplex of . (A simplicial map and its geometric realization)
For an affine -simplex of finite diameter and , every simplex in its -fold barycentric subdivision has diameter at most times the original diameter. Hence the mesh tends to zero. (Mesh tends to zero under iterated subdivision)
Let be a compact metric space (def-metric-compactness, def-metric-space) and let be an open cover of . Then there is a real , a Lebesgue number for , such that every nonempty with (def-metric-bounded-diameter) satisfies for some . Diameters of nonempty subsets of are defined because a compact space is bounded (thm-compact-subset-is-closed-and-bounded) and a subset of a bounded set is bounded. No choice principle is used. (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than lies inside a single member of the cover)
Proof
Realize the finite complexes in their barycentric Euclidean spaces. The open star of a vertex consists of points whose coordinate is positive. If several open stars intersect, their vertices belong to the support simplex of any point in the intersection; hence they span a simplex. This is the star criterion for a vertex map to extend as in F1.
For every , some vertex of has positive coordinate at . The open set therefore contains a metric ball . Finitely many cover the compact set . Choose smaller than all their radii. Every set of diameter less than containing a vertex lies in one of the corresponding , since lies in its inner ball. Thus any sufficiently small closed star at a vertex of maps into the star of a vertex of . If is empty this constraint is absent.
The preimages of all vertex stars in cover the compact . F3 gives a Lebesgue number . By F2 choose a common iterated subdivision whose simplex diameters are less than , omitting if is empty. A closed vertex star has diameter at most twice the mesh. At vertices of the subdivided make the constrained choice of the preceding step; elsewhere use . If is zero-dimensional the stars are singletons and no subdivision is needed; if is empty the assertion is vacuous.
Call the chosen vertex map . For a point in a source simplex with support vertices , belongs to every . The star criterion proves that these vertices lie in the support simplex of . Thus extends simplicially and stays in that same target simplex. It is continuous in the ambient finite-dimensional vector space. If , its support simplex under lies in , and so does the whole segment. Its endpoints are and , giving the required homotopy of pairs even if several chosen vertices coincide.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §2C, Lemma 2C.2 and Theorem 2C.1, pp.177–179 (standard reference, not scraped)