Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Aperiodic return times are eventually positive

Statement

Let p be an irreducible aperiodic transition matrix on a nonempty countable state space E (Aperiodic irreducible chain). Then every state x∈E has an integer Nx≥1 such that p(n)(x,x)>0for all n≥Nx. Consequently, for every u,v∈E there is an integer Nu,v≥1 such that p(n)(u,v)>0for all n≥Nu,v.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An irreducible aperiodic countable transition matrix p and states x,u,v.

[F1]

The positive return set is Rx={n∈N:n≥1, p(n)(x,x)>0}; when Rx≠∅, d(x) is the greatest positive integer dividing every element of Rx, and d(x)=0 when Rx=∅. (Period of a state)

[F2]

For an irreducible matrix the periods d(x) are independent of x, the period of the chain is that common value, and the chain is aperiodic exactly when this period is 1. (Aperiodic irreducible chain)

[F3]

p(r+s)(x,z)=∑w∈Ep(r)(x,w)p(s)(w,z) for all r,s≥0. (Matrix Chapman–Kolmogorov equations)

[F4]

Accessibility means x→y exactly when p(n)(x,y)>0 for some n≥0, with p(0)(x,y)=1{x=y}; the matrix is irreducible when every pair communicates. (Accessibility, communication, and irreducibility)

[F5]

For integers a,b, not both zero, gcd⁡(a,b) is the greatest common divisor of a and b, it is a common divisor of both, and gcd⁡(a,b)≥1. (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0)

Proof

technique · direct finite arithmetic: extract a finite subset of the return set with gcd one, then fill every residue class modulo its least element
1.1F1F2F3F4given

Fix x∈E; first, Rx≠∅, so d(x)≥1. If E={x}, then p(x,x)=1 by row stochasticity, so 1∈Rx. If E has at least two elements, fix y≠x; by [F4] and irreducibility there are r,s≥0 with p(r)(x,y)>0 and p(s)(y,x)>0, and since x≠y the zero-step entries p(0)(x,y), p(0)(y,x) vanish, so r,s≥1. By [F3], p(r+s)(x,x)≥p(r)(x,y)p(s)(y,x)>0, so Rx≠∅. In either case d(x) is a positive integer, and [F2] gives d(x)=1.

2.1F1F5step 1.1given

A finite F⊆Rx with 1 as its greatest common divisor exists. Start with any a1∈Rx and let g:=a1. While g>1: since 1 is the greatest positive integer dividing every element of Rx by step 1.1 and [F1], g cannot divide every element of Rx, so choose b∈Rx with g∤b and replace g by gcd⁡(g,b); then add b to F. By [F5] the new value is a positive common divisor of g and b, hence a divisor of g, and it is not g because g∤b; a positive divisor of g different from g is strictly smaller than g. The positive integers g strictly decrease at each update while remaining divisors of a1, so the process stops after finitely many updates, and it stops only when g=1. The resulting finite set F⊆Rx has iterative gcd 1: every element of F is divisible by no positive integer other than 1 that also divides all other elements.

3.1F1F3step 2.1given

Let a:=min⁡F; then a∈F and a≥1. Let ⟨F⟩ be the set of nonnegative integer combinations of the elements of F. Every positive element of ⟨F⟩ lies in Rx: this follows from [F1] and [F3] for sums of two return times, by induction for finite combinations, while the empty combination is 0 and is excluded. Let H be the set of residues modulo a of the elements of ⟨F⟩. Since a∈F, the element a has residue 0, so H is the subgroup of Z/aZ generated by the residues of the elements of F. If H were a proper subgroup, then H would be the set of multiples of h modulo a for some divisor h of a with 1<h≤a, so h would divide every f∈F; as a∈F, the integer h>1 would then divide every element of F, contradicting step 2.1. Hence H=Z/aZ, and for every residue r there is sr∈⟨F⟩ with sr≡r(moda).

4.1F3step 3.1given

Put Nx:=max⁡(1,max⁡0≤r<asr) and fix n≥Nx. Let r be the residue of n modulo a. Then n−sr is a nonnegative multiple of a, so n=sr+n−sra a belongs to ⟨F⟩ and n≥1. By step 3.1, p(n)(x,x)>0. Since x was arbitrary this proves the first assertion.

5.1F3F4step 4.1given

Fix u,v. By irreducibility [F4] there is r≥0 with p(r)(u,v)>0. Put Nu,v:=r+Nv, where Nv is the threshold of step 4.1 for the state v. If n≥Nu,v, then n−r≥Nv, so p(n−r)(v,v)>0, and [F3] gives p(n)(u,v)≥p(r)(u,v) p(n−r)(v,v)>0. If u=v this recovers the first assertion; if r=0 then u=v.

6.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 5.1given∎

Boundary cases. If E=∅ the statement is vacuous. The aperiodicity hypothesis is equivalent to d(x)=1 by [F2] and is used in step 2.1 to produce a smaller divisor; without it the conclusion can fail (a deterministic two-cycle has p(n)(x,x)>0 only for even n). The argument uses Rx≠∅, ensured by irreducibility in step 1.1, and positive return times only, so the time-zero entry p(0)(x,x)=1 plays no role. All steps are finite assertions about nonnegative entries and integer combinations; no choice principle, limit or renewal theorem is used, the display p(n) for n=0 is the identity entry, and both assertions are one-way implications.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources