How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Arbitrary-level Murphy Jucys–Murphy action is content triangular
Statement
On the Specht module of Arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke, Murphy cell and multipartition Schur modules, acts dominance-triangularly with diagonal at the node carrying . Over a field with of finite order and , every simultaneous generalized eigenword of is among the standard-tableau residue words modulo ; every such word has the fixed node-residue multiplicities of . The universal triangularity also specializes to the LM deformation DVR and the generic fibre, with no semisimplicity or affine-center premise.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The arbitrary-level Murphy basis and higher ideals of The arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke Murphy basis is cellular, and the ordinary Jucys–Murphy triangularity (The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular).
The Murphy elements form a dominance-cellular basis with higher two-sided ideals , and for and (The arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke Murphy basis is cellular); the generators satisfy and , with distant commutation (Arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke, Murphy cell and multipartition Schur modules).
The ordinary multiplicative Jucys–Murphy elements act on ordinary standard tableaux with diagonal (The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular).
Bruhat order on permutations has both the prefix-rank and reduced-subword characterizations, is invariant under inversion, and strictly lowers length on strict intervals (Basic properties of the Bruhat order on ). Shift the zero-based convention by one to use labels .
Proof
Given: The multipartition , the Murphy module with its
basis , and the data of [F1]–[F2].
Initial-row eigenvalues. Consider only a nonempty component and put ; empty components contribute no nodes or JM eigenvalues. Then [F1] gives . The internal finite Hecke submodule generated by modulo higher global shapes is spanned by standard internal component permutations; each such permutation fixes the smallest internal label (that label occupies the first node of its component), so its Hecke element has a reduced word in the internal generators with indices at least and commutes with . Hence acts as the scalar on that whole submodule, with errors in the two-sided ideal . The -recurrence then identifies on this submodule with times the ordinary multiplicative Jucys–Murphy element of [F2], by induction from the finite quadratic relation and the additive-JM recurrence (a polynomial identity also at ). Ordinary JM triangularity gives diagonal at the node occupied by local entry : the internal label is not a row index, and no extra subtraction of occurs. For the initial component tableau, which is maximal in tableau dominance, there are no strictly more dominant same-shape terms. Thus for the node carrying global entry , .
JM triangularity for every standard multitableau. Inducting through a reduced word of , the relations [F1] give where the corrections are supported on proper Bruhat subwords (at the first correction a generator is deleted, moving its linear -coefficient through preceding generators deletes further generators, and finite quadratic multiplication preserves Bruhat support). Applying this with and multiplying by on the left, step 1.1 evaluates every surviving coefficient modulo higher shapes; a correction reduces first to a row-standard representative of its Young-subgroup coset, the removed row subgroup contributing its row eigenvalue, with ; the Bruhat/tableau-prefix relation on the ordered rows of all components then makes strictly dominate , and componentwise straightening of keeps the shape or produces same-shape tableaux at least in prefix dominance, hence strictly dominating . The leading eigenvalue is at the node carrying , because is its initial-row label under . Therefore the exact arbitrary-level JM content statement, independent of an affine center theorem, semisimplicity or block classification.
Residue words and boundary cases. On the resulting Specht module a total ordering extending tableau dominance triangularizes all the simultaneously; the one-dimensional successive quotients have exactly the content characters of step 2.1, so every simultaneous generalized eigenword is among the standard-tableau residue words (The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular for the ordinary part); the residue multiplicities of every such word equal the node-residue multiplicities of , since permuting the labels of a standard tableau does not change the multiset of node residues. For rank zero, , the sole shape and tableau are empty and all assertions have their one-dimensional interpretation. The triangularity is polynomial in the parameters, so it specializes to the LM deformation DVR and to the generic fibre.
Remarks
The lemma supplies the content-triangularity input of the Jantzen and core-reduction theory over the original parameters, with no semisimplicity or affine-center hypothesis; the diagonal is the node content and the corrections are strictly dominant standard tableaux.
Depends on
- Basic properties of the Bruhat order on $S_n$
- Arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke, Murphy cell and multipartition Schur modules
- The arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke Murphy basis is cellular
- The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular
- Universal nondegenerate affine Hecke ordered monomials form a basis
Used by
- Cyclotomic Schur weight Gram determinants are products of monic semistandard norms Lemma
- Generic cyclotomic Schur deformation standards have nondegenerate forms Lemma
- The degenerate and nondegenerate Ariki theorems have distinct parameter ranges Remark
- Central content sectors are zero or primitive cyclotomic Hecke blocks Theorem
- Cyclotomic Schur standards and corner functor control block linkage Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mathas, The representation theory of the Ariki–Koike and cyclotomic q-Schur algebras, math/0204025 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete 79-page manuscript (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lyle–Mathas, Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras, math/0607451v4 (standard reference, not scraped)