Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke Murphy basis is cellular

Statement

For Hn in Arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke, Murphy cell and multipartition Schur modules over the universal Laurent parameter ring, the elements mst indexed by all ℓ-multipartitions of n and standard tableaux s,t of that shape are a basis and a dominance-cellular datum: mst∗=mts,msth≡∑vr(t,v)(h) msv(modH>λ), with coefficients r(t,v)(h) independent of s. The higher spans are actual two-sided ideals. Every commutative specialization with unit parameters inherits the cellular basis; in particular the arbitrary-field finite-e nondegenerate charged specializations (qH≠1) and the LM deformation DVR retain it. The specialization z=1 here is the multiplicative presentation with Ti2=1, not the additive degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra. The universal rank is supplied independently by Universal cyclotomic Hecke ordered monomials form a basis, not by a primitive-block classification.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The arbitrary-level cyclotomic presentation and its Murphy elements mst, the universal ordered PBW basis, and the ordinary finite-type-A Murphy cellular basis (Arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke, Murphy cell and multipartition Schur modules, Universal cyclotomic Hecke ordered monomials form a basis, The Murphy tableau elements form a cellular basis).

[F1]

The ordinary Murphy elements form a cellular basis of the finite Hecke algebra with the cell law msth≡∑vr(t,v)(h)msv, with coefficients independent of s, modulo higher ordinary shapes, the standard basis Tw exists, and the symmetric group has the Coxeter presentation (The Murphy tableau elements form a cellular basis, The standard basis of the generic type-A Hecke algebra, The symmetric group has the Coxeter presentation).

[F2]

The semistandard Murphy bases and Specht filtrations of the ordinary permutation modules hold, with #SStd⁡ multiplicities (Type-A Hecke permutation modules: semistandard Murphy bases and Specht filtrations), and ∑ρ⊢mfρ2=m! (The sum of squares of the standard tableau numbers).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The multipartition data and the suppliers [F1]–[F2]; write

N≥λ for the span of all standard mst with shape at least

λ in dominance, and N>λ for the span of the strictly higher

shapes.

1.1F1algebra

Finite-generator straightening. Every component-preserving row-standard multitableau factors its distinguished permutation into a permutation inside the contiguous component intervals followed by the unique shuffle of the intervals preserving internal order; the two inversion sets are disjoint, so the factorization is length-additive. Multiplying by uλ (which commutes with the Hecke generators internal to the intervals), ordinary Murphy straightening applies in each component; higher ordinary component shapes preserve component sizes and strictly increase multipartition dominance, and the final component shuffle relabels each component by an increasing list whose selected entries at any cutoff are an initial segment, so tableau-prefix inequalities are exactly the ordinary ones at the corresponding initial-segment length. For a fixed initial left row and right multiplication by Ti: if tsi is standard the length formula gives the usual standard term (or qH times it plus (qH−1)mtλt); if i,i+1 share a row the result is qHm; and if they share a component but the interchange fails standardness, factoring out the increasing component shuffle and applying the ordinary cell law gives same-shape terms with the same initial left row and strictly higher multipartition terms, the required transfer identity TcTi=TjTc following from csi=sjc and the length/quadratic formula. A cross-component column failure is impossible because column standardness is imposed componentwise. Descending induction over a linear extension of multipartition dominance therefore makes each N≥λ and N>λ stable under all finite generators; multiplying on the left by Td(s)∗ and applying ∗ makes the higher spans two-sided ideals. This induction concerns spanning sets only and assumes no independence.

1.2F1algebra

The cyclotomic component shift. Let a=(ak) with ak=∑b<k∣λ(b)∣ and ua=uλ, and let b=a+ek. Put ub=ua(Xak+1−Qk); the factors commute, and for a=ak the defining recurrence gives the exact identity uaTa⋯T1X1T1⋯Ta=qHa(Qkua+ub), by substituting Ta⋯T1X1T1⋯Ta=qHaXa+1 and adding/subtracting Qkua; the case a=0 is included. For k>1 form the multicomposition ν obtained by appending a singleton row to component k−1 and deleting the first node of the first row of component k. Its cumulative sizes are b, so uν=ub, and its Young subgroup is contained in Sλ; the left length-additive coset expansion gives xλub=∑vTv∗mν. Sorting the rows of ν in each component conjugates its Young subgroup and gives mν=Tdmsort⁡νTd−1 with uν commuting with the component-preserving permutation, so the ordinary row-sorting argument expresses each term in standard pairs of shapes at least sort⁡ν, which strictly dominates λ: the cumulative total through component k−1 strictly increases and no later cumulative sum decreases. Hence xλub∈N>λ. For k=1, nonemptiness of component 1 forces as≥1 for all s≥2, so ub contains every factor (X1−Qs) and vanishes by the cyclotomic relation; again xλub∈N>λ.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Right multiplication by X1. Let t be standard with entry 1 in component k, an initial node, and initial label a+1 with a=ak. Then d(t)=(sa⋯s1)w with w fixing 1 and ℓ(d(t))=a+ℓ(w): pulling label a+1 to value 1 crosses exactly the a smaller initial labels, whose final values exceed 1. A permutation fixing 1 has a reduced word in s2,…,sn−1, so Tw commutes with X1. Multiplying the identity of step 1.2 on the right by (T1⋯Ta)−1 and then by Tw gives mλTd(t)X1=qHaQkmλ(T1⋯Ta)−1Tw+qHaxλub(T1⋯Ta)−1Tw, whose second term lies in N>λ by step 1.2 and finite-generator stability, and whose first term lies modulo N>λ in the fixed-initial-row span. Hence that span is stable under X1; multiplying on the left by Td(s)∗ and using the left stability of the higher shapes gives the coefficient-independence law msth≡∑vr(t,v)(h)msv(modN>λ) first for each generator and then for every word, with coefficients independent of s, and ∗ makes the higher spans two-sided. Since Xr=qH1−rTr−1⋯T1X1T1⋯Tr−1 and the cyclotomic constant term is a unit when the Qa are invertible, these generators generate the Laurent affine quotient.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

Spanning and cellularity. The smallest multipartition ω=(∅,…,∅,(1n)) satisfies uω=xω=mω=1, so the generator-stable span of the standard mst contains 1 and is all of Hn: the Murphy family spans. By Universal cyclotomic Hecke ordered monomials form a basis, Hn is independently free of rank ℓnn!. Counting standard pairs with the ordinary identity ∑ρ⊢mfρ2=m! at the component sizes na contributes (n!)2/∏ana!, and summing over the multipartition compositions gives ℓnn! by the multinomial theorem. The spanning family therefore has exactly the independent rank; its coefficient matrix in the ordered PBW basis is square and surjective between free modules, hence invertible, so the family is an R-basis and the proved involution and coefficient-independence laws are actual cellularity. Tensoring the proved basis and presentation supplies every commutative specialization with unit parameters, including repeated charges in the nondegenerate charged branch and the LM deformation DVR; the additive degenerate branch is a different presentation and is not a Laurent-parameter specialization; no generic-flatness inference is made. Rank zero is the singleton empty basis.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 establish the generator-stable higher ideals for the finite-generator subalgebra; step 2.1 extends stability to X1 and hence to all polynomial generators and gives the coefficient-independence law with two-sided higher spans; and step 3.1 proves that the standard Murphy family is an R-basis of exactly the independent rank, so that the involution and coefficient laws are cellularity in the sense of the Definition. Every commutative specialization with unit parameters inherits the basis and the cell law. No primitive-block classification is used.

Remarks

The theorem is downstream of the universal PBW basis and supplies the cellular/Murphy input of the later Specht, Schur and Jantzen constructions; it does not feed the earlier BK construction. The dominance bookkeeping is explicit: component straightening increases multipartition dominance, and the cyclotomic shift places the correcting terms strictly above the shape.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Arbitrary-level cyclotomic Hecke, Murphy cell and multipartition Schur modules.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources