Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Prime-to-characteristic torsion bound for affine commutative groups

Statement

Assume AC and DC (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let k be an algebraically closed field and let N be a smooth, connected, commutative affine group scheme of finite type over k; put a=dim⁡N. For every prime ℓ≠char⁡k and every integer ν≥1, ∣N[ℓν](k)∣≤ℓνa, where N[ℓν]=ker⁡(ℓν ⁣:N→N) is the ℓν-torsion subgroup scheme and N[ℓν](k) is its group of k-points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, an algebraically closed field k, a smooth connected commutative affine finite-type k-group N with a=dim⁡N, a prime ℓ≠char⁡k and an integer ν≥1.

[F1]

The right regular representation of an affine finite-type group scheme over an arbitrary field contains a finite-dimensional subrepresentation V with G→GL⁡(V) a closed immersion, allowing nonreduced G (Affine finite-type group schemes have faithful finite-dimensional representations).

[F2]

A smooth connected finite-type k-group scheme is geometrically integral; over the algebraically closed field k this says k[N] is a domain (Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected, which assumes AC).

[F3]

Over an algebraically closed field, the strong Nullstellensatz says that the ideal of polynomials vanishing on the zero locus of an ideal in a polynomial ring is its radical (Strong Nullstellensatz: I(V(I)) equals the radical of I, which assumes AC).

[F4]

For an abelian group M the group algebra k[M] has k-basis the distinct group-like elements em, with Δ(em)=em⊗em, and Dk(M)(R)=Hom⁡(M,R×) for every k-algebra R (Diagonalizable groups and their character modules, Split diagonalizable groups are dual to abelian groups).

[F5]

For a finite-type k-domain A with fraction field K, dim⁡A=trdeg⁡kK (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree).

Proof

technique · direct. The proof triangulates the matrices of $k$-points, identifies the diagonal quotient as a diagonalizable group with torsion-free character group of rank at most $a$, and compares torsion on the two sides
1.1F1givenconstruct

By [F1] fix a closed immersion j:N→GL⁡m of k-group schemes, and for g∈N(k) let M(g)∈GL⁡m(k) be its matrix. Since j is a group homomorphism and N is commutative, M(g)M(h)=M(gh)=M(h)M(g), so the k-span A⊆End⁡k(km) of the set {M(g):g∈N(k)} is a finite-dimensional commutative subalgebra. Let W⊆km be a nonzero A-stable subspace of minimal dimension. If some A-element has an eigenspace C inside W with 0≠C≠W, then C is a smaller nonzero A-stable subspace, a contradiction; if every element of A acts as a scalar on W, then every line in W is A-stable; hence in either case dim⁡kW=1 and W is a common eigenvector. Applying this argument to km and then to the successive quotients by the lines produced yields a filtration 0=Vm⊂Vm−1⊂⋯⊂V0=km with M(g)Vi⊆Vi for all i and all g∈N(k); in a basis adapted to this filtration every M(g) is upper triangular.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Put P=k[xij], let J=ker⁡(P→k[N]) be the kernel of the map sending each matrix coordinate to its pullback under j, and write δ=det⁡(xij). The map Pδ=k[xij,δ−1]→k[N] is surjective because j is a closed immersion into GL⁡m, and its kernel is Jδ. For every i>j, xij vanishes at every common zero of J and zδ−1 in the polynomial ring P[z]: such a zero is an invertible matrix satisfying the equations of the closed subscheme N⊆GL⁡m, hence is a k-point of N and is upper triangular by step 1.1. Applying [F3] in P[z] gives xij∈(J,zδ−1). After quotienting by zδ−1 and identifying P[z]/(zδ−1)≅Pδ, this says xij∈Jδ. Since Pδ/Jδ≅k[N] is a domain by [F2], Jδ is radical and therefore xij∈Jδ. Thus the coordinate functions below the diagonal vanish scheme-theoretically on N, so j factors through the closed subgroup scheme B⊆GL⁡m of upper triangular matrices. In particular the diagonal characters χi:=uii (the images in k[N] of the diagonal coordinate functions) are units and satisfy Δ(χi)=χi⊗χi in the Hopf algebra k[N].

3.1F4step 2.1algebra

Let R⊆k[N] be the subalgebra generated by χ1±1,…,χm±1. It is a Hopf subalgebra because the χi are group-like units. Its group-like elements are the monomials χ(n)=∏iχini for n∈Zm, and distinct group-like elements of a Hopf algebra over a field are linearly independent: a shortest nontrivial relation ∑i∈Scihi=0 with distinct hi and all ci≠0 becomes, after applying Δ and subtracting the tensor product of the relation with hs, the relation ∑i∈S∖{s}cihi⊗(hi−hs)=0; the hi for i≠s are linearly independent by minimality of S, so hi=hs for all i, a contradiction. Hence R=k[M] where M=Zm/L is the quotient of Zm by the relations L={n:χ(n)=1}, with k-basis the distinct χ(n); by [F4] this is the coordinate Hopf algebra of the diagonalizable group Dk(M), and N→Dk(M) is the morphism dual to the inclusion R⊆k[N].

4.1F2F4F5step 3.1algebra

The ring k[M] is a domain, being a subalgebra of the domain k[N] by [F2]. If M had a nonzero element n of finite order d>1, then (χ(n)−1)(χ(n)d−1+⋯+χ(n)+1)=χ(n)d−1=χ(dn)−1=0 in k[M], and both factors are nonzero because distinct group-like elements are linearly independent by step 3.1 and the second factor is a sum of distinct group-likes with coefficient 1. This contradicts that k[N] is a domain, so M is torsion-free; as a finitely generated torsion-free abelian group, M≅Zt for some t≥0. Since R=k[M] is a finite-type k-domain contained in k[N], its fraction field embeds in Frac⁡(k[N])=k(N), whence t=dim⁡k[M]=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(k[M])≤trdeg⁡kk(N)=dim⁡k[N]=a by [F5].

5.1givenstep 3.1step 4.1algebra

Let φ:N(k)→Dk(M)(k)=Hom⁡(M,k×) be the homomorphism induced by N→Dk(M). A point g∈N(k) lies in ker⁡φ precisely when χi(g)=1 for all i, that is, precisely when its matrix M(g) is upper unitriangular; write M(g)=I+U with U strictly upper triangular, so Um=0. If char⁡k=0 and g has finite order d, then (M(g)−I)m=0 and M(g)d=I, so the minimal polynomial of M(g) divides both (X−1)m and Xd−1; in characteristic zero Xd−1 is squarefree, so the gcd is X−1 and M(g)=I. If char⁡k=p>0 and pe≥m, then M(g)pe=I+Upe=I, so M(g) has p-power order. Hence an element of N(k) of order dividing ℓν with ℓ≠p that lies in ker⁡φ equals the identity: it has order dividing both ℓν and a p-power, hence order 1. Consequently the restriction N[ℓν](k)→Dk(M)(k)[ℓν] is injective.

6.1F4step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Since M≅Zt, evaluation gives Dk(M)(k)=Hom⁡(Zt,k×)≅(k×)t, whose ℓν-torsion is Hom⁡(Zt,μℓν(k))≅(Z/ℓνZ)t because k is algebraically closed and ℓ≠char⁡k, of cardinal ℓνt. By step 5.1, ∣N[ℓν](k)∣≤∣Dk(M)(k)[ℓν]∣=ℓνt, and t≤a by step 4.1, so ∣N[ℓν](k)∣≤ℓνa. AC is used through [F2] and [F3]; DC is inherited from the faithful-representation supplier chain [F1] as declared.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources