How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Artin's product-cancellation dichotomy
Statement
Let be peripheral-boundary-preserving, and write as reduced words, with . In particular the displayed conjugator expressions have no internal cancellation. Exactly one of the following holds:
- No maximal junction cancellation of two adjacent factors cancels a middle letter. Then every is empty, is the identity, and .
- Some adjacent pair has such a cancellation. Choose the least index with this property and stop its junction cancellation at the first cancelled middle letter. Put , , , and . If the left middle letter is cancelled first, then as a reduced concatenation; if the right middle letter is cancelled first, then as a reduced concatenation.
Here cancelling a middle letter means deleting it with its inverse, not merely exposing it. The first cancelled middle letter is defined for the chosen junction; no order-independent first cancellation is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The reduced conjugator expressions above and the exact product identity, with the peripheral and boundary conventions of Peripheral-boundary-preserving automorphisms of F_n.
The product identity follows from the homomorphism and boundary condition (Peripheral-boundary-preserving automorphisms of F_n, Free group on a set of generators).
Free reduction deletes adjacent inverse pairs, and the resulting reduced word is unique (Reduced words form the free group on an alphabet).
Proof
A first middle cancellation must come from original neighbours. Reduce the whole product by deleting adjacent inverse pairs, for example always the leftmost available pair. Before the first middle letter is cancelled, every factor retains its middle letter and therefore has a nonempty residue. Its surviving letters form an interval of the original reduced factor: a deletion inside such an interval is impossible, so deletions take place only at residue boundaries. No factor has disappeared, and these boundaries are between original neighbours. To cancel the left middle letter at the boundary of , all of on its right must first cancel against the initial letters of ; those letters cannot have been removed at the other boundary without first cancelling the right middle letter. The corresponding assertion holds for cancellation of the right middle letter. Thus any first middle cancellation in the whole product also occurs in a junction cancellation of an original adjacent pair.
If no adjacent pair cancels a middle letter. Step 1.1 shows that no middle letter is cancelled in the whole reduction. All middle letters therefore survive in its final word of length , leaving no conjugator letters and forcing their order to be . The initial cannot be deleted: it is reduced, has no factor on its left, and cannot cancel across its surviving middle letter. Hence is empty. Inductively, if are empty, the initial letters of cannot cancel against the surviving earlier middle letters or across its own middle letter. Hence is empty as well. Thus all conjugators vanish and , so . This includes .
The two explicit prefix forms. Otherwise choose the least qualifying . At that junction the words are and . If is the first middle letter cancelled, cancellation removes the entire suffix of the left factor against the head of , and the next letter of must be . Equivalently as a reduced word. If is the first cancelled middle letter, the whole head has cancelled against the suffix of , and the preceding letter of must be ; hence . The two positive middle letters cannot cancel each other, so the first deletion involves exactly one of them. Exhaustiveness and exclusivity follow by whether a qualifying junction exists.
Remarks
This is the cancellation split in Artin's proof of Theorem 16, printed p. 114. The prefix forms in step 3.1 give explicit shorter conjugators in lem-an-extremal-cancellation-shortens-an-artin-substitution.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emil Artin, Theory of Braids, Annals of Mathematics 48 (1947), pp. 101-126, the proof of Theorem 16 before and in case 1, printed pp. 113-114 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Juan Gonzalez-Meneses, Basic results on braid groups, section 1.6, printed pp. 9-10 (standard reference, not scraped)