How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Associated primes lie in the support
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be a left -module. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and a left -module .
A prime ideal is associated to exactly when for some (Associated primes of a module).
A prime ideal lies in exactly when the localization is nonzero (Support of a module).
The module localization consists of fractions with , and exactly when some kills (Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset, A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator, Localisation at a prime ideal: ).
Proof
Let . By [L1], choose with . If in , then by the definition of localization there exists with . Hence , a contradiction. So in .
By [L2], step 1.1 shows . Thus .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.63.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §17 (standard reference, not scraped)