How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The boundary fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , , be a bounded domain with surface measure on (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals). If satisfies then on . Equivalently, if satisfies for every , then on , where is the outward unit normal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; a bounded domain with surface measure on ; a function with for every . For the equivalent formulation, with for every .
Under the Axiom of Choice, the Axiom of Countable Choice holds (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration), which is the measure convention under which the boundary charts, the ambient partitions and the surface integral are set up.
A bounded domain is locally a graph: near each boundary point, after a rigid change of coordinates, is for a function on a ball, is locally the subgraph, and the outward normal is ; the surface integral over a compact face contained in a regular patch is computed by the chart with Gram factor (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals, Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces), the definition being assembled from finitely many charts with an ambient smooth partition of unity (Finite ambient partitions near compact sets).
For every and every centre there is a smooth bump equal to one on and supported strictly inside (Compactly supported scaled Euclidean bumps).
If on an open set satisfies for every , then almost everywhere on (The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations).
Proof
Local chart at a boundary point. Fix . By [F1] we may, after translating and applying a rigid motion, assume and find , and a neighbourhood with the boundary in is the graph of and the domain in is its subgraph, with both sets intersected with ; write and . Any function on whose support lies in this patch has surface integral equal to the chart integral against , by [F1].
A cutoff and suitable test functions. Choose with and let be the smooth bump of [F2] with on and . Choose with and for . For every define , where ; then , hence , and for one has because there.
The local integral identity. The hypothesis gives for the test function of step 2.1, whose boundary support lies in the patch of step 1.1; the chart formula therefore yields , where is continuous because is continuous on and is . As was arbitrary, satisfies for every test function supported in that ball.
The fundamental lemma at . Applying [F3] to on the ball gives almost everywhere; since , this implies almost everywhere, and since is continuous, for every . In particular .
Conclusion on the boundary. The point was arbitrary, so on .
The vector-valued formulation. Let satisfy for every . The boundary function is continuous, because is continuous on and the normal field is continuous on the boundary [F1]; the argument of steps 1.1–5.1 uses only the boundary values of the continuous integrand and the linearity of the integral in it, so it applies with replaced by and gives on , that is on .
Depends on
- The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations
- Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces
- Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals
- Finite ambient partitions near compact sets
- Compactly supported scaled Euclidean bumps
- AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Riccardo Cristoferi, Calculus of Variations: Lecture Notes, Carnegie Mellon University 2016 (complete 133-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Francesco Paolo Maiale (course by Giovanni Alberti), Lecture Notes Calculus of Variations A, University of Pisa (last update 21 August 2019; complete 149-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)