Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The boundary fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let Ω⊆Rn, n≥2, be a bounded C1 domain with surface measure σ on ∂Ω (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals). If g∈C(Ω‾) satisfies ∫∂Ωg φ dσ=0for every φ∈C∞(Ω‾), then g=0 on ∂Ω. Equivalently, if h∈C(Ω‾;Rn) satisfies ∫∂Ω(h⋅ν)φ dσ=0 for every φ∈C∞(Ω‾), then h⋅ν=0 on ∂Ω, where ν is the outward unit normal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a bounded C1 domain Ω⊆Rn with surface measure σ on ∂Ω; a function g∈C(Ω‾) with ∫∂Ωgφ dσ=0 for every φ∈C∞(Ω‾). For the equivalent formulation, h∈C(Ω‾;Rn) with ∫∂Ω(h⋅ν)φ dσ=0 for every φ∈C∞(Ω‾).

[F0]

Under the Axiom of Choice, the Axiom of Countable Choice holds (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration), which is the measure convention under which the boundary charts, the ambient partitions and the surface integral are set up.

[F1]

A bounded C1 domain is locally a graph: near each boundary point, after a rigid change of coordinates, ∂Ω is {z=(y,t):t=h(y)} for a C1 function h on a ball, Ω is locally the subgraph, and the outward normal is ν=(−Dh,1)/1+∣Dh∣2; the surface integral over a compact face contained in a regular patch is computed by the chart X(y)=(y,h(y)) with Gram factor J(y)=1+∣Dh(y)∣2≥1 (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals, Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces), the definition being assembled from finitely many charts with an ambient smooth partition of unity (Finite ambient partitions near compact sets).

[F2]

For every 0<r<R and every centre a there is a smooth bump equal to one on B‾r(a) and supported strictly inside BR(a) (Compactly supported scaled Euclidean bumps).

[F3]

If G∈Lloc1(U) on an open set U⊆Rm satisfies ∫UGψ=0 for every ψ∈Cc∞(U), then G=0 almost everywhere on U (The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations).

Proof

technique · direct, by flattening the boundary at an arbitrary boundary point and applying the fundamental lemma to the charted integrand
1.1F0F1given

Local chart at a boundary point. Fix x0∈∂Ω. By [F1] we may, after translating and applying a rigid motion, assume x0=0 and find ρ>0, h∈C1(B(0,ρ)) and a neighbourhood U∋0 with the boundary in U is the graph of h and the domain in U is its subgraph, with both sets intersected with U; write X(y):=(y,h(y)) and J:=1+∣Dh∣2≥1. Any function on ∂Ω whose support lies in this patch has surface integral equal to the chart integral against J, by [F1].

2.1F2step 1.1

A cutoff and suitable test functions. Choose 0<r<R with B(0,R)⊆U and let η be the smooth bump of [F2] with η=1 on B‾r(0) and supp⁡η⊆BR(0). Choose δ>0 with δ<ρ and ∣(y,h(y))∣<r for ∣y∣<δ. For every ψ∈Cc∞({∣y∣<δ}) define φ(z):=ψ(z′)η(z), where z′=(z1,…,zn−1); then φ∈Cc∞(Rn), hence φ∈C∞(Ω‾), and for ∣y∣<δ one has φ(X(y))=ψ(y)η(X(y))=ψ(y) because X(y)∈B‾r(0) there.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1

The local integral identity. The hypothesis gives ∫∂Ωgφ dσ=0 for the test function φ of step 2.1, whose boundary support lies in the patch of step 1.1; the chart formula therefore yields 0=∫B(0,ρ)g(X(y))φ(X(y))J(y) dy=∫B(0,ρ)G(y)ψ(y) dy, where G:=g∘X⋅J is continuous because g is continuous on Ω‾ and h is C1. As ψ∈Cc∞({∣y∣<δ}) was arbitrary, G∈Lloc1 satisfies ∫Gψ=0 for every test function supported in that ball.

4.1F3step 3.1

The fundamental lemma at x0. Applying [F3] to G on the ball {∣y∣<δ} gives G=0 almost everywhere; since J≥1, this implies g∘X=0 almost everywhere, and since y↦g(X(y)) is continuous, g(X(y))=0 for every ∣y∣<δ. In particular g(x0)=g(X(0))=0.

5.1step 4.1

Conclusion on the boundary. The point x0∈∂Ω was arbitrary, so g=0 on ∂Ω.

6.1F1step 5.1∎

The vector-valued formulation. Let h∈C(Ω‾;Rn) satisfy ∫∂Ω(h⋅ν)φ dσ=0 for every φ∈C∞(Ω‾). The boundary function γ:=(h⋅ν)∣∂Ω is continuous, because h is continuous on Ω‾ and the normal field ν is continuous on the C1 boundary [F1]; the argument of steps 1.1–5.1 uses only the boundary values of the continuous integrand and the linearity of the integral in it, so it applies with g replaced by γ and gives γ=0 on ∂Ω, that is h⋅ν=0 on ∂Ω.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources