Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Second and fourth moments of bounded-coefficient SDE increments

Statement

Let X solve the autonomous SDE in Milstein updates, iterated Brownian integrals, and commutative noise on a filtered probability space with an m-dimensional Brownian motion relative to the filtration. Assume b,σ1,…,σm∈Cb3(Rd), with the Cb3 convention of the Definition. There is a constant C depending only on the coefficient bounds and d,m such that for every t≥0, 0≤r≤1, and A∈Ft, E ⁣[1A∣Xt+r−Xt∣2]≤Cr P(A),E ⁣[1A∣Xt+r−Xt∣4]≤Cr2 P(A). These event-weighted inequalities are the conditional second- and fourth-moment bounds for the increment.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the Brownian It^o process and SDE coefficient assumptions in the Statement, t≥0, 0≤r≤1, and an event A∈Ft.

[L1]

Milstein updates, iterated Brownian integrals, and commutative noise: the state space is finite-dimensional, the drift and diffusion vector fields are componentwise Cb3, and their sup norms and derivative sup norms are finite.

[F1]

Continuous Brownian Ito processes: the usual filtration and Brownian hypotheses give a continuous adapted representative with a drift-plus-It^o-integral representation; Brownian increments after t are independent of Ft, and the process class is closed under stopping with drift and diffusion multiplied by the stopped indicator.

[F2]

Event-weighted Ito isometry after a conditioning time: for A∈Ft, each scalar It^o integral over (t,t+r] satisfies E[1A∣∫H,dWj∣2]=E[1A∫∣H∣2ds].

[F3]

Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes: for f∈C1,2, It^o's drift is Df b+12∑jD2f[σj,σj] and the martingale term is ∑jDf σj dWj.

[F4]

The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version: finite-energy It^o integral processes are square-integrable martingales, so their stopped increments have mean zero after multiplication by an event known at the start time.

[F5]

Fatou's lemma: for nonnegative random variables converging almost surely, the expectation of the limit is at most the lower limit of the expectations.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited from [F1]--[F3]; the moment estimates introduce no further choice.

Proof

Given: The assumptions above.

1.1L1F1F2A1

Put Ys=Xs−Xt, and let B bound ∣b∣ and S2 bound ∑j∣σj∣2. The integral equation, ∣∫tt+rb(Xs)ds∣2≤B2r2, the finite-sum inequality ∣∑jvj∣2≤m∑j∣vj∣2, and [F2] give E[1A∣Yt+r∣2]≤2B2r2P(A)+2S2rP(A)≤CrP(A), since r≤1. The event-weighted identity applies to each integrand σj(Xs)1(t,t+r](s), whose squared norm is bounded by ∥σj∥∞2.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1

For R>0, use the continuous adapted version from [F1], modifying it on its exceptional null set if necessary; usual completeness makes this an adapted null modification and leaves all moment and SDE assertions unchanged. Let θR=inf⁡{u≥0:∣Yt+u∣≥R}. This is a stopping time: for fixed u, {θR≤u}={sup⁡0≤v≤u∣Yt+v∣≥R}, and continuity makes the supremum equal to the supremum over rational v∈[0,u] together with u, hence Ft+u-measurable. Put YuR=Xt+(u∧θR)−Xt=Yt+(u∧θR), qR(u)=E[1A∣YuR∣4], and pR(u)=E[1A∣YuR∣2]. By the stopped representation in [F1], the drift and diffusion integrands are multiplied by 1s−t≤θR. Its drift square is at most B2u2, and applying [F2] coordinatewise with the finite-sum bound gives pR(u)≤2B2u2P(A)+2S2uP(A)≤CuP(A), by the same bound as step 1.1. Apply [F3] to f(y)=∣y∣4 and the stopped process. The Hessian formula gives drift 4∣YR∣2⟨YR,b(X)⟩+2∣YR∣2∑j∣σj(X)∣2+4∑j⟨YR,σj(X)⟩2 before the stopping time. Bounded coefficients and 4B∣YR∣3≤C(∣YR∣4+∣YR∣2) bound its absolute value by C(∣YR∣4+∣YR∣2). The stopped stochastic integrand is bounded, so [F4] makes its expectation after multiplication by 1A zero. Consequently qR(u)≤C∫0uqR(v) dv+Cu2P(A),0≤u≤r. The second term follows from pR(v)≤CvP(A); all constants are independent of R.

3.1F5step 2.1algebra

Define QR(u)=∫0uqR(v) dv. The inequality in step 2.1 implies QR′(u)≤CQR(u)+Cu2P(A) for almost every u, with QR(0)=0. Multiplying by e−Cu and integrating gives QR(u)≤C′u3P(A) for u≤1. Returning to step 2.1 gives qR(u)≤C′′u2P(A). As R→∞, path continuity implies YuR→Yt+u almost surely; [F5] therefore yields the asserted fourth-moment bound.

4.1A1step 1.1step 3.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 3.1 are exactly the asserted event-weighted second- and fourth-moment estimates, with constants independent of t,r,A. The stopped argument and finite-dimensional It^o calculation add no axiom beyond [A1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources