Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Branching rule for Specht modules: adding or removing boxes in distinct columns

Statement

Let F be a field of characteristic 0, let λ⊢n, and let SFλ be the corresponding field-valued Specht module (Integral and field-valued Specht modules).

(i) For every k≥0 there is an isomorphism of FSn+k-modules

Ind⁡Sn×SkSn+k(SFλ⊠F)≅⨁μSFμ,

summed over the partitions μ⊢n+k obtained from λ by adding one box to each of k different columns (equivalently, μ⊇λ and μ/λ is a horizontal k-strip).

(ii) For every 0≤k≤n there is an isomorphism of FSn−k-modules

(Res⁡Sn−k×SkSnSFλ)Sk≅⨁νSFν,

summed over the partitions ν⊢n−k obtained from λ by removing one box from each of k different columns, where the outer subscript denotes Sk-coinvariants of the restriction to the ordered block subgroup Sn−k×Sk≤Sn (The coinvariants functor); the left-hand side is an FSn−k-module because the two blocks commute. All multiplicities are 0 or 1. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F of characteristic 0, a partition λ⊢n, and an integer k≥0 in part (i) or 0≤k≤n in part (ii).

[F1]

For every field extension K/F, the standard polytabloid bases identify K⊗FSFμ≅SKμ for every μ, and dim⁡FSFμ=fμ is independent of the characteristic-zero field (Integral and field-valued Specht modules, Integral Garnir straightening and the field-uniform standard basis).

[F2]

Over any characteristic-zero field the modules SFμ form a complete irredundant list of irreducible FSm-modules, and Maschke's theorem makes every finite-dimensional FSm-module semisimple; consequently, for a finite-dimensional semisimple module M, the multiplicity of SFμ in M equals dim⁡FHom⁡FSm(SFμ,M), and a nonzero map between irreducible modules is an isomorphism (Specht modules classify the irreducibles over every field of characteristic zero, Maschke's theorem for finite groups over fields whose characteristic does not divide ∣G∣, Schur's lemma for irreducible representations: a nonzero intertwiner is an isomorphism, and End⁡G(V) is a division ring).

[F3]

Over C, with the ordered block subgroup, the outer Pieri rule gives Ind⁡Sm×SrSm+r(SCμ⊠S(r))≅⨁νSCν over the ν obtained from μ by adding one box in each of r different columns, all multiplicities one; for r=0 this is SCμ itself (Outer Pieri rules for a trivial or sign factor).

[F4]

For finite groups H≤G and a commutative ring k, induction is the tensor product kG⊗kHW and is left adjoint to restriction; dually Frobenius reciprocity gives Hom⁡kG(Ind⁡HGW,V)≅Hom⁡kH(W,Res⁡HGV) (The function model of induction agrees with the tensor-product model k[G]⊗k[H]W, Induction and coinduction are the two adjoints, Frobenius reciprocity for complex characters).

[F5]

Extension of scalars along R→S sends tensor products to tensor products: S⊗R(M⊗RN)≅(S⊗RM)⊗S(S⊗RN) and N⊗RM≅N⊗S(S⊗RM); balanced tensor products are associative, and tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums (Change of rings: N⊗RM≅N⊗S(S⊗RM), Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules, Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums, Restriction of scalars and extension of scalars S⊗RM along a ring homomorphism R→S, The tensor product M⊗RN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums).

[F6]

For a finite group Q and a kQ-module M, averaging over Q identifies the coinvariants MQ with the invariants MQ when k contains Q, so for a module U on which Q acts trivially one has Hom⁡k(U,MQ)≅Hom⁡kQ(U,M) (The coinvariants functor, Maschke's theorem for finite groups over fields whose characteristic does not divide ∣G∣).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F4F5givenalgebra

Let K/F be a field extension. By [F1], K⊗FSFμ≅SKμ; by [F4] and [F5], induction commutes with extension of scalars, so K⊗FInd⁡Sn×SkSn+k(SFλ⊠F)≅Ind⁡Sn×SkSn+k(SKλ⊠K). Moreover, for finite-dimensional F-modules U,W carrying G-actions, dim⁡KHom⁡KG(K⊗FU,K⊗FW)=dim⁡FHom⁡FG(U,W): choose bases, write the intertwining conditions as a finite linear system over F, and note that its rank is unchanged by extending scalars.

1.2F1F2F3given

Over C, [F3] with m=n, r=k, μ=λ gives MC:=Ind⁡Sn×SkSn+k(SCλ⊠C)≅⨁μSCμ, summed over the partitions μ⊢n+k obtained from λ by adding one box in each of k different columns, each multiplicity one; by [F1, F2] this is the decomposition of MC into irreducibles.

1.3F4F6givenalgebra

Let N be a finite-dimensional F(Sn−k×Sk)-module and let ν⊢n−k. Since char⁡F=0, averaging over the finite group Sk identifies the coinvariants NSk with the invariants NSk [F6], and because Sn−k and Sk commute this identification is FSn−k-equivariant; hence Hom⁡FSn−k(SFν,NSk)≅Hom⁡F(Sn−k×Sk)(SFν⊠F,N), where Sk acts trivially on the first factor. Composing with the adjunction of [F4] gives, for any FSn-module W, Hom⁡FSn−k(SFν,(Res⁡Sn−k×SkSnW)Sk)≅Hom⁡FSn(Ind⁡Sn−k×SkSn(SFν⊠F),W).

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2

Let MQ:=Ind⁡Sn×SkSn+k(SQλ⊠Q). By step 1.1, C⊗QMQ≅MC, and for each μ⊢n+k the multiplicity of SQμ in MQ, which is dim⁡QHom⁡QSn+k(SQμ,MQ) by [F2], equals the multiplicity of SCμ in MC. By step 1.2 those multiplicities are 1 for the horizontal-strip shapes μ and 0 otherwise. Since MQ is finite-dimensional and semisimple over Q [F2] and its irreducibles are classified, these multiplicities determine it: MQ≅⨁μSQμ over the same shapes.

3.1F1F2F5step 1.1step 2.1

Applying F⊗Q− to step 2.1 and using step 1.1, [F5] and the base-change isomorphism F⊗QSQμ≅SFμ of [F1] gives Ind⁡Sn×SkSn+k(SFλ⊠F)≅F⊗QMQ≅⨁μSFμ over exactly the horizontal-strip shapes, with all multiplicities one. This is (i).

4.1F2step 3.1step 1.3

Take W=SFλ in step 1.3 and apply (i) from step 3.1 to Ind⁡Sn−k×SkSn(SFν⊠F): it is ⨁λ′SFλ′, summed over the partitions λ′⊢n obtained from ν by adding one box in each of k different columns. By [F2] and the classification, dim⁡FHom⁡FSn(SFλ,⨁λ′SFλ′) is 1 if λ occurs among the shapes λ′ and 0 otherwise. The condition that λ is obtained from ν by adding one box in each of k different columns is equivalent to its reverse, that ν is obtained from λ by removing one box from each of k different columns; hence the multiplicity mν:=dim⁡FHom⁡FSn−k(SFν,(Res⁡Sn−k×SkSnSFλ)Sk) is that 0/1 value.

5.1F2step 2.1step 4.1∎

The module (Res⁡Sn−k×SkSnSFλ)Sk is finite-dimensional over F and semisimple by Maschke [F2], and its irreducible constituents are among the SFν by the classification; by step 4.1 and [F2] its multiplicity at SFν is mν, which is 1 exactly when ν is obtained from λ by removing one box from each of k different columns and 0 otherwise. Hence (Res⁡Sn−k×SkSnSFλ)Sk≅⨁νSFν over those ν, with all multiplicities 0 or 1. This proves (ii) and completes the lemma.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources