How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Endpoint stability for local geodesics in complete locally CAT(0) spaces
Statement
Let be a complete metric space that is locally CAT(0) (Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles), and let be a local geodesic. Then there is such that for every the closed ball is complete and convex, and for all with and there is exactly one local geodesic from to with convex. For this :
(i) for every , and (Length in a metric target: lower semicontinuity and arc-length reparametrization);
(ii) the assignment is continuous for the sup metric , which induces uniform convergence (Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on and on ): if and in then the corresponding local geodesics converge uniformly.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complete metric space that is locally CAT(0), and a local geodesic into it, with its constant-speed parametrization; write for its speed.
Locally CAT(0) means every point has a positive radius with CAT(0) in the induced metric; the induced metric on is a geodesic metric and is complete when is complete and finite, the ball being closed in (Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space, Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).
In a CAT(0) space geodesic segments are unique and vary continuously with their endpoints, and for geodesics with a common initial point and proportional parametrizations the distance function is convex: ; the midpoint inequality holds for every midpoint of a geodesic (Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences clauses (iv)(a), (iv)(b) and (iv)(d)).
A compact subset of a metric space is covered by finitely many balls of any prescribed positive radius; a continuous image of a compact interval is compact; and a finite set of positive numbers has a positive minimum (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space, Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset).
Length: for a path the length is the supremum of its polygonal sums; it is lower semicontinuous under uniform convergence; the chord bound and the additivity hold (Length in a metric target: lower semicontinuity and arc-length reparametrization).
Continuity at a parameter gives a neighbourhood whose image lies in any prescribed ball about its image; satisfies the triangle inequality and the reverse triangle inequality (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the - form, Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric, The reverse triangle inequality in any metric space).
A sequence in a metric space converges when its distances to the limit tend to , and uniform convergence of maps into is the metric-distance condition of Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on and on . For continuous maps on , is finite because is continuous and bounded on the compact interval; taking suprema in the metric triangle inequality makes a metric, and its convergence condition is exactly uniform convergence; a Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: iff in , Cauchy sequence in a metric space, Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on and on , Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).
Proof
Convexity of balls in a CAT(0) space. Let be CAT(0), , and ; let be a midpoint of the unique geodesic . By [F2] the midpoint inequality gives , so ; iterating the same computation for the midpoints of and and so on, every dyadic point of lies in , and the dyadic points are dense in , so continuity of the geodesic [F2] puts all of in . Hence is convex.
A uniform radius. Consider all pairs with and CAT(0). Their open half-radius balls cover the compact image of , so [F3] supplies finitely many covering it, without choosing a radius at every point. Put . For every , some has , and , so . This ball is thus a ball in a CAT(0) space, hence complete (it is closed in the complete space ) and convex by step 1.1; in particular it is uniquely geodesic and has the convexity property [F2] for pairs of geodesics inside it.
Convexity tools. For geodesics in one CAT(0) chart, introduce the geodesic from to : the common-initial-point estimate of [F2], followed by the same estimate on reversed geodesics, gives . Apply this on every subinterval to obtain convexity of the distance function. A continuous locally convex real function on an interval is convex: on a sufficiently fine subdivision its consecutive secant slopes are nondecreasing by local convexity; summing the resulting inequalities gives the secant inequality for any three prescribed points. Consequently, for local geodesics satisfying , the function is convex: near each parameter both curves are geodesics in the ball of step 2.1. Their distance is thus bounded by interpolation of endpoint distances, and they coincide if their endpoints coincide. A local geodesic whose entire image lies in one CAT(0) chart equals that chart's geodesic between its endpoints, by the same local-convexity argument with endpoint distances zero.
Initial existence. Let mean that for every with and endpoints at distances from there is a constant-speed local geodesic with throughout. Take such that (any if ). Both endpoints then lie in ; its geodesic joins them. The restriction of lies in that ball, hence is its geodesic by step 3.1. Convex separation bounds the distance between these two geodesics by the maximum of their endpoint distances, which is . Thus holds.
Alternating-thirds construction. Suppose and ; set and . Put and . For , use on and to obtain from to and from to , and set , . Step 3.1 makes all these choices unique. Set . Convexity shows inductively that each entire curve is within of . It also gives and, for , and , since the evaluation points are halfway along their respective intervals and the other endpoints agree. Hence both increments at index are at most . Both sequences are Cauchy, and completeness gives limits in the closed -balls around .
Limits and overlap. Step 3.1 also gives and ; summing the geometric series yields uniform limits . To verify they are local geodesics, fix a parameter and a small interval on which and all these curves lie in one ball of step 2.1, using the strict margin and continuity of . Each restricted curve is the chart's geodesic by step 3.1; the endpoint estimate there shows the limit is that geodesic too. Their speeds on overlapping such intervals agree, so each limit has a single constant speed. On , the endpoints of and are , so step 3.1 identifies them on the overlap. Their union is a constant-speed local geodesic on (if the overlap is constant, both speeds are zero). Its separation from is locally convex and therefore convex, bounded by the endpoint maximum . This proves .
Existence and uniqueness. Iteration yields for all ; choose with to obtain on . Step 3.1 makes its separation from convex and gives . Conversely every candidate with convex separation has this bound, and step 3.1 identifies any two candidates with the same endpoints.
Length with one endpoint fixed. Suppose are two solutions in this tube with . For sufficiently small both initial restrictions are minimizing, so step 3.1 and the triangle inequality give . Divide by to obtain . Let be the solution from to given by step 6.1. Apply this inequality first to the reversed curves and then to : and . This is the asserted length bound.
Endpoint continuity. For solutions in the same tube, step 3.1 gives . When the endpoints converge the right side tends to zero, which proves uniform convergence and clause (ii).
Depends on
- Comparison triangles, the CAT(0) and CAT(1) inequalities, local CAT, local geodesics and round circles
- Comparison triangles in the Euclidean plane and the round sphere, model spaces, and CAT(0) and CAT(1) consequences
- Length in a metric target: lower semicontinuity and arc-length reparametrization
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space
- Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space
- Cauchy sequence in a metric space
- Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ form
- Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: $x_k \to x$ iff $d(x_k, x) \to 0$ in $\mathbb{R}$
- Geodesics and geodesic metric spaces
- Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on $Y^{X}$ and on $C(X,Y)$
- The reverse triangle inequality $|d(x,z) - d(y,z)| \le d(x,y)$ in any metric space
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- A compact metric space is complete and totally bounded, and neither implication uses any choice principle
- The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
97 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Martin R. Bridson and André Haefliger, Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature (Springer Grundlehren 319, 1999; author-hosted PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael W. Davis, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (first-edition author manuscript, 2007-2008) (standard reference, not scraped)