How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points
Statement
Let be a field, a group scheme of finite type over , and a closed subscheme. Then has the unique induced structure of a closed subgroup scheme if and only if is a subgroup for every commutative unital -algebra . Equivalently, the identity , multiplication restricted to , and inverse restricted to all factor through . No reducedness, smoothness, or algebraic closedness hypothesis is imposed.
Facts & Assumptions
The group-object identities and the definitions of homomorphism and closed subgroup scheme are those of Group schemes of finite type over a field and Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes. A closed immersion has unique factorizations through it.
A closed subscheme of is , and fibre products of schemes exist. (Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra, Existence of all scheme fibre products)
We assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the affine closed-immersion quotient theorem in [F2]. Its proof uses prime-ideal detection and nilradical detection to obtain affine quotient presentations. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Given: AC, , , as above.
If is a closed subgroup scheme, its structure morphisms give a group law on for every and its inclusion in preserves the three operations by [F1]. Thus is a subgroup. Conversely suppose every is a subgroup. Taking shows that the identity has a factor .
Cover by affine opens . The restrictions of the two projections to are points . By hypothesis their product in lies in , so factors through . The factors agree on every overlap by uniqueness through the closed immersion and hence glue to . Similarly, on every affine open , its inclusion is a point of , whose inverse in belongs to . These factors glue uniquely to . This proves all three factorization assertions using universal affine points, rather than only field-valued points.
Compose the associativity, identity and inverse identities for these factors with . They become precisely the corresponding identities in by construction. Since is a monomorphism, the identities hold in . The closed scheme is finite type over : a finite affine cover of the finite-type pulls back by [F2] to , a finite affine cover with finitely generated -algebras. Thus is a group scheme of finite type and a group-scheme morphism by [F1]. Uniqueness of every factor proves uniqueness of its group law. The converse for the equivalent factorization criterion follows from exactly the same transfer of identities. AC is inherited through the affine quotient presentation in [F2], as recorded in [F3].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, complete Groupoid Schemes chapter (standard reference, not scraped)