How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Group Schemes of Finite Type over a Field
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Suprema and Infima
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
A group scheme of finite type over a field is a finite-type -scheme equipped with multiplication, identity and inverse morphisms satisfying the group-object identities. Equivalently, the represented functor sends every -scheme to a group , so each commutative unital -algebra has a group of points . Neither reducedness nor smoothness is assumed, which is what allows finite nonreduced group schemes.
The page then defines morphisms of -group schemes and closed subgroup schemes, and proves that a closed subscheme is a closed subgroup scheme exactly when its points over every commutative unital -algebra form a subgroup. Testing all algebras, including those with nilpotents, is essential: the companion shows that rational points alone do not determine a group law.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Group schemes of finite type over a field
Definition
Let be a field. A group scheme of finite type over is a finite-type -scheme with -morphisms satisfying the following identities of scheme morphisms. Multiplication is associative, on ; under the canonical identifications; and , where is the structure map. The products exist by Existence of all scheme fibre products; the base and finite-type conventions are Schemes and morphisms over a base and Locally finite type and finite type morphisms.
For every -scheme , put . The three structure morphisms give a group law on , naturally under precomposition in . In particular for every commutative unital -algebra , means and is a group, including for algebras with nilpotents. The definition imposes neither reducedness nor smoothness, and allows finite nonreduced group schemes. A group scheme is called commutative if agrees with its composition with the factor-exchange map.
Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes
Definition
Let be group schemes of finite type over a field , as in Group schemes of finite type over a field. A morphism of -group schemes is a -morphism satisfying Consequently is a group homomorphism for every -scheme , naturally in .
A closed subgroup scheme of is a closed immersion in the sense of Closed immersions of schemes, where is a group scheme and is a morphism of group schemes. Its multiplication, identity, and inverse are the restrictions of those of . A closed immersion is a monomorphism: a factorization through its subscheme, when it exists, is unique, since the map of sheaves onto the subscheme's structure sheaf is surjective. Therefore these restricted structure morphisms are uniquely determined. A closed subscheme of is not assumed to be a subgroup merely because its -rational points form one; all algebra-valued points, including points over nonreduced algebras, are relevant.
Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points
Statement
Let be a field, a group scheme of finite type over , and a closed subscheme. Then has the unique induced structure of a closed subgroup scheme if and only if is a subgroup for every commutative unital -algebra . Equivalently, the identity , multiplication restricted to , and inverse restricted to all factor through . No reducedness, smoothness, or algebraic closedness hypothesis is imposed.
Facts & Assumptions
The group-object identities and the definitions of homomorphism and closed subgroup scheme are those of Group schemes of finite type over a field and Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes. A closed immersion has unique factorizations through it.
A closed subscheme of is , and fibre products of schemes exist. (Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra, Existence of all scheme fibre products)
We assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the affine closed-immersion quotient theorem in [F2]. Its proof uses prime-ideal detection and nilradical detection to obtain affine quotient presentations. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Given: AC, , , as above.
If is a closed subgroup scheme, its structure morphisms give a group law on for every and its inclusion in preserves the three operations by [F1]. Thus is a subgroup. Conversely suppose every is a subgroup. Taking shows that the identity has a factor .
Cover by affine opens . The restrictions of the two projections to are points . By hypothesis their product in lies in , so factors through . The factors agree on every overlap by uniqueness through the closed immersion and hence glue to . Similarly, on every affine open , its inclusion is a point of , whose inverse in belongs to . These factors glue uniquely to . This proves all three factorization assertions using universal affine points, rather than only field-valued points.
Compose the associativity, identity and inverse identities for these factors with . They become precisely the corresponding identities in by construction. Since is a monomorphism, the identities hold in . The closed scheme is finite type over : a finite affine cover of the finite-type pulls back by [F2] to , a finite affine cover with finitely generated -algebras. Thus is a group scheme of finite type and a group-scheme morphism by [F1]. Uniqueness of every factor proves uniqueness of its group law. The converse for the equivalent factorization criterion follows from exactly the same transfer of identities. AC is inherited through the affine quotient presentation in [F2], as recorded in [F3].
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.