Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Group Schemes of Finite Type over a Field

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

A group scheme of finite type over a field k is a finite-type k-scheme equipped with multiplication, identity and inverse morphisms satisfying the group-object identities. Equivalently, the represented functor sends every k-scheme T to a group G(T), so each commutative unital k-algebra R has a group of points G(R). Neither reducedness nor smoothness is assumed, which is what allows finite nonreduced group schemes.

The page then defines morphisms of k-group schemes and closed subgroup schemes, and proves that a closed subscheme is a closed subgroup scheme exactly when its points over every commutative unital k-algebra form a subgroup. Testing all algebras, including those with nilpotents, is essential: the companion shows that rational points alone do not determine a group law.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Group schemes of finite type over a field

Definition

Let k be a field. A group scheme of finite type over k is a finite-type k-scheme G with k-morphisms m:G×kG→G,e:Spec⁡k→G,i:G→G satisfying the following identities of scheme morphisms. Multiplication is associative, m∘(m×id⁡)=m∘(id⁡×m) on G3; m∘(e×id⁡)=id⁡=m∘(id⁡×e) under the canonical identifications; and m∘(i,id⁡)=e∘p=m∘(id⁡,i), where p:G→Spec⁡k is the structure map. The products exist by Existence of all scheme fibre products; the base and finite-type conventions are Schemes and morphisms over a base and Locally finite type and finite type morphisms.

For every k-scheme T, put G(T)=Hom⁡k(T,G). The three structure morphisms give a group law on G(T), naturally under precomposition in T. In particular for every commutative unital k-algebra R, G(R) means G(Spec⁡R) and is a group, including for algebras with nilpotents. The definition imposes neither reducedness nor smoothness, and allows finite nonreduced group schemes. A group scheme is called commutative if m agrees with its composition with the factor-exchange map.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes

Definition

Let G,H be group schemes of finite type over a field k, as in Group schemes of finite type over a field. A morphism of k-group schemes is a k-morphism f:G→H satisfying f∘mG=mH∘(f×f),f∘eG=eH,iH∘f=f∘iG. Consequently G(T)→H(T) is a group homomorphism for every k-scheme T, naturally in T.

A closed subgroup scheme of G is a closed immersion j:H↪G in the sense of Closed immersions of schemes, where H is a group scheme and j is a morphism of group schemes. Its multiplication, identity, and inverse are the restrictions of those of G. A closed immersion is a monomorphism: a factorization through its subscheme, when it exists, is unique, since the map of sheaves onto the subscheme's structure sheaf is surjective. Therefore these restricted structure morphisms are uniquely determined. A closed subscheme of G is not assumed to be a subgroup merely because its k-rational points form one; all algebra-valued points, including points over nonreduced algebras, are relevant.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points

Statement

Let k be a field, G a group scheme of finite type over k, and j:H↪G a closed subscheme. Then H has the unique induced structure of a closed subgroup scheme if and only if H(R)⊆G(R) is a subgroup for every commutative unital k-algebra R. Equivalently, the identity eG, multiplication restricted to H×kH, and inverse restricted to H all factor through H. No reducedness, smoothness, or algebraic closedness hypothesis is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The group-object identities and the definitions of homomorphism and closed subgroup scheme are those of Group schemes of finite type over a field and Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes. A closed immersion has unique factorizations through it.

[F2]

A closed subscheme of Spec⁡A is Spec⁡(A/I), and fibre products of schemes exist. (Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra, Existence of all scheme fibre products)

[F3]

We assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the affine closed-immersion quotient theorem in [F2]. Its proof uses prime-ideal detection and nilradical detection to obtain affine quotient presentations. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

Given: AC, k, G, j:H↪G as above.

1.1F1given

If H is a closed subgroup scheme, its structure morphisms give a group law on H(R) for every R and its inclusion in G(R) preserves the three operations by [F1]. Thus H(R) is a subgroup. Conversely suppose every H(R) is a subgroup. Taking R=k shows that the identity eG∈G(k) has a factor eH:Spec⁡k→H.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

Cover H×kH by affine opens U=Spec⁡R. The restrictions of the two projections to U are points a,b∈H(R). By hypothesis their product in G(R) lies in H(R), so mG∘(j×j)∣U factors through H. The factors agree on every overlap by uniqueness through the closed immersion and hence glue to mH:H×kH→H. Similarly, on every affine open Spec⁡R⊂H, its inclusion is a point of H(R), whose inverse in G(R) belongs to H(R). These factors glue uniquely to iH:H→H. This proves all three factorization assertions using universal affine points, rather than only field-valued points.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

Compose the associativity, identity and inverse identities for these factors with j. They become precisely the corresponding identities in G by construction. Since j is a monomorphism, the identities hold in H. The closed scheme H is finite type over k: a finite affine cover Spec⁡Ai of the finite-type G pulls back by [F2] to Spec⁡(Ai/Ii), a finite affine cover with finitely generated k-algebras. Thus H is a group scheme of finite type and j a group-scheme morphism by [F1]. Uniqueness of every factor proves uniqueness of its group law. The converse for the equivalent factorization criterion follows from exactly the same transfer of identities. AC is inherited through the affine quotient presentation in [F2], as recorded in [F3].

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources