Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hilbert Functors and Projective Hilbert Schemes — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These items test the hypotheses and the strata picture of the companion page on Hilbert functors and projective Hilbert schemes. A finite closed subscheme of Pk1 of length d has the constant Hilbert polynomial d for the usual polarization, including nonreduced points and points of residue degree greater than one; the counterexample Z=Spec⁡k over T=Spec⁡k[ϵ]/(ϵ2), embedded in PT1 by (X,ϵ), keeps constant fibre polynomial 1 without being flat over T, so its polynomial-1 flattening stratum is the closed subscheme ϵ=0 with the same underlying point but a different scheme structure. The fat-point family X2−tY2=0 over k[t] is flat of length two and its scheme-theoretic pullbacks along arbitrary base changes, including nonreduced ones, are again the pullbacks of its classifying map to the corresponding Hilbert stratum. Finally, infinitely many nonempty open and closed strata of the full Hilbert functor of P1 show that it is not quasi-compact, in contrast with the projective fixed-polynomial pieces.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Hilbert polynomial of finite points on the projective line

Example

For any field k, a finite closed subscheme Z⊆Pk1 of length d has the constant Hilbert polynomial P(r)=d for the usual polarization, including nonreduced points and points with nontrivial residue field. A family of such points belongs to the constant-polynomial stratum only when it is flat and finitely presented as specified in Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families.

Verification

Given: AC and DC, a field k, and a finite closed subscheme Z of length d.

[F1] Finite schemes have the constant length polynomial (The Hilbert polynomial of a finite scheme is its length). The fixed-polynomial subfunctor and its universal stratum are Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families, Universal family and open and closed Hilbert polynomial strata.

1.1F1algebra

By the finite-scheme supplier in [F1], every invertible twist restricted to Z has d-dimensional sections and zero higher cohomology. Thus its Euler characteristic is the constant d for every integer twist. This includes nilpotent structure and residue-field degrees, since length is the full dimension of the finite coordinate algebra over k.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The Hilbert polynomial is consequently P(r)=d. For a flat finitely presented family of total fibre length d, the classifying map lands in the corresponding open and closed stratum by [F1]. The finite-scheme supplier also gives d=0 for the empty subscheme.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Constant fibre polynomial does not give flatness over a nonreduced base

Statement refuted

Every closed subscheme of finite presentation in a projective family whose geometric fibres have one fixed Hilbert polynomial defines a member of that fixed-polynomial Hilbert functor.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, a field k, A=k[ϵ]/(ϵ2), T=Spec⁡A, and Z⊆PT1 defined by the homogeneous ideal (X,ϵ) in coordinates [X:Y].

[F1]

Hilbert families require base-flatness as well as finite presentation (Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families). Universal flattening uses scheme structure, not merely a partition of the points (Universal scheme theoretic flattening by Hilbert polynomial).

Counterexample

1.1algebra

The scheme Z is supported in Y≠0 and there has algebra A[x]/(x,ϵ)=k. Its inclusion has finite presentation. The base has one geometric fibre, and after any extension of its residue field that fibre is one reduced point. Its Hilbert polynomial is therefore the constant polynomial 1.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Nevertheless k is not flat over A: tensoring the inclusion (ϵ)↪A with k gives the zero map from the nonzero module (ϵ)⊗Ak≅k to k. Tensoring has destroyed injectivity. Thus Z is excluded from the Hilbert functor by [F1]. Its flattening locus for polynomial 1 is the closed subscheme ϵ=0, since after a map A→B the quotient B/ϵB is locally free of rank one exactly when ϵ maps to zero; a surjection B→B/ϵB of locally free rank-one modules must be an isomorphism. The stratum and the base have the same underlying point but different scheme structures.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A flat fat-point family and its base changes

Example

Let A=k[t] and let Z⊆PA1 be defined by X2−tY2=0. It is a flat family of length two, and every base change, including a nonreduced base change, is the pullback of its classifying map to the constant-polynomial Hilbert stratum.

Verification

Given: AC and DC, a field k, and A=k[t].

[F1] Finite schemes have the constant length polynomial (The Hilbert polynomial of a finite scheme is its length). Classifying maps, universal families, and arbitrary base change are Universal family and open and closed Hilbert polynomial strata, with the family conditions in Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families.

1.1F1algebra

The family has no points on Y=0: there its equation becomes X2=0 but X is invertible. On Y≠0 its algebra is A[x]/(x2−t), free over A with basis 1,x by division by the monic polynomial. It is finite flat of rank two, and its closed immersion is finitely presented. Every fibre has length two and therefore constant Hilbert polynomial 2 by [F1]. At t=0 it is a double point. In characteristic different from two, nonzero fibres are either two distinct rational points or a quadratic field point. In characteristic two a nonzero fibre can also be a double point: at t=1, x2−1=(x−1)2. Total length is always two.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

For an arbitrary A-algebra B, its algebra pulls back to B[x]/(x2−tB), still free on 1,x. Thus the family remains finitely presented and flat after any base change. By [F1], the corresponding map to the Hilbert scheme is the composite of Spec⁡B→Spec⁡A with the original classifying map, and its scheme theoretic pulled-back family is exactly this algebra. In particular the assertion applies when B has nilpotents.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The full Hilbert functor need not be quasi-compact

Example

For every field k, the full Hilbert scheme of Pk1 is not quasi-compact. Its fixed-polynomial pieces are projective, while there are infinitely many nonempty open and closed pieces.

Verification

Given: AC and DC and a field k.

[F1] The full Hilbert scheme is the disjoint union of fixed-polynomial projective representatives (Projective Hilbert schemes represent all flat finitely presented families).

[F2] A length-d finite subscheme has constant polynomial d (The Hilbert polynomial of a finite scheme is its length).

1.1F2algebra

For every d≥1, the subscheme on the affine chart given by xd=0, viewed as a closed subscheme of Pk1 supported at [0:1], is finitely presented and has length d. Being over a field it is flat. Thus the polynomial-d stratum is nonempty by [F2]. These are distinct strata for distinct d.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

All strata are open and closed by [F1], and they form an open cover of the full Hilbert scheme. No finite subfamily of this cover contains the nonempty strata for all d. This cover has no finite subcover, proving failure of quasi-compactness and therefore of finite type or properness over k.