How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hilbert Functors and Projective Hilbert Schemes — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hilbert Functors and Projective Hilbert Schemes
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
These items test the hypotheses and the strata picture of the companion page on Hilbert functors and projective Hilbert schemes. A finite closed subscheme of of length has the constant Hilbert polynomial for the usual polarization, including nonreduced points and points of residue degree greater than one; the counterexample over , embedded in by , keeps constant fibre polynomial without being flat over , so its polynomial- flattening stratum is the closed subscheme with the same underlying point but a different scheme structure. The fat-point family over is flat of length two and its scheme-theoretic pullbacks along arbitrary base changes, including nonreduced ones, are again the pullbacks of its classifying map to the corresponding Hilbert stratum. Finally, infinitely many nonempty open and closed strata of the full Hilbert functor of show that it is not quasi-compact, in contrast with the projective fixed-polynomial pieces.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The Hilbert polynomial of finite points on the projective line
Example
For any field , a finite closed subscheme of length has the constant Hilbert polynomial for the usual polarization, including nonreduced points and points with nontrivial residue field. A family of such points belongs to the constant-polynomial stratum only when it is flat and finitely presented as specified in Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families.
Verification
Given: AC and DC, a field , and a finite closed subscheme of length .
[F1] Finite schemes have the constant length polynomial (The Hilbert polynomial of a finite scheme is its length). The fixed-polynomial subfunctor and its universal stratum are Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families, Universal family and open and closed Hilbert polynomial strata.
By the finite-scheme supplier in [F1], every invertible twist restricted to has -dimensional sections and zero higher cohomology. Thus its Euler characteristic is the constant for every integer twist. This includes nilpotent structure and residue-field degrees, since length is the full dimension of the finite coordinate algebra over .
The Hilbert polynomial is consequently . For a flat finitely presented family of total fibre length , the classifying map lands in the corresponding open and closed stratum by [F1]. The finite-scheme supplier also gives for the empty subscheme.
Constant fibre polynomial does not give flatness over a nonreduced base
Statement refuted
Every closed subscheme of finite presentation in a projective family whose geometric fibres have one fixed Hilbert polynomial defines a member of that fixed-polynomial Hilbert functor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and DC, a field , , , and defined by the homogeneous ideal in coordinates .
Hilbert families require base-flatness as well as finite presentation (Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families). Universal flattening uses scheme structure, not merely a partition of the points (Universal scheme theoretic flattening by Hilbert polynomial).
Counterexample
The scheme is supported in and there has algebra . Its inclusion has finite presentation. The base has one geometric fibre, and after any extension of its residue field that fibre is one reduced point. Its Hilbert polynomial is therefore the constant polynomial .
Nevertheless is not flat over : tensoring the inclusion with gives the zero map from the nonzero module to . Tensoring has destroyed injectivity. Thus is excluded from the Hilbert functor by [F1]. Its flattening locus for polynomial is the closed subscheme , since after a map the quotient is locally free of rank one exactly when maps to zero; a surjection of locally free rank-one modules must be an isomorphism. The stratum and the base have the same underlying point but different scheme structures.
A flat fat-point family and its base changes
Example
Let and let be defined by . It is a flat family of length two, and every base change, including a nonreduced base change, is the pullback of its classifying map to the constant-polynomial Hilbert stratum.
Verification
Given: AC and DC, a field , and .
[F1] Finite schemes have the constant length polynomial (The Hilbert polynomial of a finite scheme is its length). Classifying maps, universal families, and arbitrary base change are Universal family and open and closed Hilbert polynomial strata, with the family conditions in Hilbert functor of flat finitely presented projective families.
The family has no points on : there its equation becomes but is invertible. On its algebra is , free over with basis by division by the monic polynomial. It is finite flat of rank two, and its closed immersion is finitely presented. Every fibre has length two and therefore constant Hilbert polynomial by [F1]. At it is a double point. In characteristic different from two, nonzero fibres are either two distinct rational points or a quadratic field point. In characteristic two a nonzero fibre can also be a double point: at , . Total length is always two.
For an arbitrary -algebra , its algebra pulls back to , still free on . Thus the family remains finitely presented and flat after any base change. By [F1], the corresponding map to the Hilbert scheme is the composite of with the original classifying map, and its scheme theoretic pulled-back family is exactly this algebra. In particular the assertion applies when has nilpotents.
The full Hilbert functor need not be quasi-compact
Example
For every field , the full Hilbert scheme of is not quasi-compact. Its fixed-polynomial pieces are projective, while there are infinitely many nonempty open and closed pieces.
Verification
Given: AC and DC and a field .
[F1] The full Hilbert scheme is the disjoint union of fixed-polynomial projective representatives (Projective Hilbert schemes represent all flat finitely presented families).
[F2] A length- finite subscheme has constant polynomial (The Hilbert polynomial of a finite scheme is its length).
For every , the subscheme on the affine chart given by , viewed as a closed subscheme of supported at , is finitely presented and has length . Being over a field it is flat. Thus the polynomial- stratum is nonempty by [F2]. These are distinct strata for distinct .
All strata are open and closed by [F1], and they form an open cover of the full Hilbert scheme. No finite subfamily of this cover contains the nonempty strata for all . This cover has no finite subcover, proving failure of quasi-compactness and therefore of finite type or properness over .