How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The common submeasure and its bounded density
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let and be finite positive measures on a measurable space . Put . Choose nonnegative measurable Radon–Nikodym density representatives and , modified on a -null set so that everywhere. Then is the greatest measure dominated by both and . The measurable function takes values in and is a version of . Here means for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, finite positive measures on , and .
The Axiom of Choice: AC says that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.
Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures: a finite sum of measures is a measure. Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures: a finite measure is sigma-finite, since the whole space is a one-set finite-measure cover.
A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density, The Radon-Nikodym derivative as an almost-everywhere equivalence class, and Absolute continuity of a signed or complex measure with respect to a positive measure: under AC, if are finite positive measures and , there is a real-valued measurable density whose integral on every measurable set recovers , unique -almost everywhere. Indeed, the constant exhaustion meets the theorem's hypotheses, since a positive measure equals its total variation.
A sigma-finite positive measure has a nonnegative Radon–Nikodym density version: under AC, if are sigma-finite positive measures and , the class has a finite-valued nonnegative measurable representative.
The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure and Measures on sigma-algebras: if is measurable, then is a measure.
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral and Monotone convergence for the integral: the nonnegative integral is monotone, and increasing limits pass through it.
Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions and Integrating against a Radon-Nikodym derivative recovers integration against the measure: a nonnegative measurable function is an increasing limit of simple functions; for simple , when is finite positive and .
Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral and Extended-real-valued measurable functions: finite sums, scalar multiplies, pointwise infima, and Borel preimages of measurable functions are measurable.
Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: on any measure space, the integral of the sum of two nonnegative measurable functions is the sum of their integrals. Applied to indicator-restricted functions, this also holds for integrals over every measurable set.
Proof
Given: AC and the finite positive measures .
The measure is finite, and . By [A1], [F1]–[F3], choose finite-valued nonnegative measurable representatives and . For every , Uniqueness in [F2] gives -almost everywhere. On the measurable null set where this fails, replace by and by ; the modified functions remain representatives and now satisfy everywhere.
The function is measurable and nonnegative by [F7]. By [F4], defines a measure. Since , monotonicity in [F5] and the density identities in step 1.1 give and for every . In particular, , so is finite.
Let be any measure with and . It is finite because , and : if , nonnegativity gives , and hence . By [A1], [F1]–[F3], choose a finite-valued nonnegative density . For each integer , the measurable set satisfies Since , this forces . Thus is null; the same argument using gives almost everywhere. Therefore outside a measurable -null set. Integrals on that null set vanish by simple approximation and [F5]–[F6], so monotonicity yields for all . Together with step 2.1, this proves that is the greatest common submeasure.
For each real , ; for , and for the set is empty. By [F7], each such set is measurable, so is measurable. It lies in , and everywhere: on this follows by multiplying the ratio by , while on both sides are zero. For a fixed , approximate increasingly by simple functions. [F6] gives equality of their integrals against and against ; applying [F5] to both limits gives Thus is a nonnegative measurable representative of with values in .
Depends on
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- The Axiom of Choice
- Measures on sigma-algebras
- Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures
- Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures
- Absolute continuity of a signed or complex measure with respect to a positive measure
- The Radon-Nikodym derivative as an almost-everywhere equivalence class
- A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density
- A sigma-finite positive measure has a nonnegative Radon–Nikodym density version
- Integrating against a Radon-Nikodym derivative recovers integration against the measure
- The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure
- Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral
- Extended-real-valued measurable functions
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Theorem 6.27 and proof, §6.8, printed pp. 75–77 (standard reference, not scraped)