Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Metropolis–Hastings kernels

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page constructs the Metropolis–Hastings transition kernel from a target probability and a general proposal kernel. It defines the accepted flow as the greatest measure dominated by the forward and reverse proposal flows, selects a measurable Radon–Nikodym acceptance version, and retains rejected proposals as self-transitions. A local common-density calculation recovers the familiar pointwise minimum density for the accepted flow and the familiar proposal ratio when the target and proposal have compatible densities. The common-density version fixes acceptance at one on the forward-zero set; versions agree only almost everywhere under the forward flow. The main theorem proves reversibility and target invariance; these facts alone do not imply irreducibility, uniqueness, convergence, mixing rates, or a central limit theorem. See general-state-mcmc-kernels-and-reversibility for the general-state kernel and reversibility interface.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The common submeasure of two finite densities

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let λ be a sigma-finite positive measure on (E,F), and let ρ and σ be finite positive measures absolutely continuous with respect to λ. Suppose finite-valued nonnegative measurable functions f,g:E→[0,∞) satisfy ρ(A)=∫Af dλ,σ(A)=∫Ag dλ(A∈F). Then η(A):=∫Amin⁡{f,g} dλ is the greatest measure dominated by both ρ and σ, where domination means inequality on every measurable set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a sigma-finite positive measure λ, finite positive measures ρ,σ≪λ, and finite-valued nonnegative measurable densities f,g satisfying the displayed integral identities.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

Measures on sigma-algebras and Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures: ρ,σ are countably additive and finite, while λ has a countable measurable cover by finite-λ sets.

[F3]

The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure: for nonnegative measurable h, A↦∫Ah dλ is a measure.

[F4]

Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral and Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: the nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous by nonnegative scalars, and it is additive for sums of nonnegative measurable functions.

[F5]

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: finite measurable sums, scalar multiples, and pointwise minima are measurable.

[F6]

A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes: a nonnegative measurable function has integral zero over a λ-null set.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the statement.

1.1F1F3F4F5given

Put h=min⁡{f,g}. It is measurable and nonnegative by [F5]. Thus η(A)=∫Ah dλ is a measure by [F3]. Since h≤f,g, monotonicity [F4] gives η(A)≤ρ(A) and η(A)≤σ(A) for every A. In particular η(E)≤ρ(E)<∞, so η is finite.

1.2A1F1F2givenchoose

Let θ be any measure with θ≤ρ and θ≤σ. Then θ(E)≤ρ(E)<∞, so θ is finite. If λ(B)=0, then ρ(B)=∫Bf dλ=0; hence θ(B)≤ρ(B)=0. Therefore θ≪λ. It is sigma-finite because it is finite [F1]. By [A1] and [F2], choose a finite-valued nonnegative measurable density k with θ(A)=∫Ak dλ for every A.

2.1F1F4F5step 1.2

For each integer n≥1, set En={k≥f+1/n}. This set is measurable by [F5]. Monotonicity, additivity, and homogeneity [F4] give θ(En)=∫Enk dλ≥∫Enf dλ+λ(En)n=ρ(En)+λ(En)n. But θ(En)≤ρ(En)<∞, so λ(En)=0. The same argument with g and σ shows that each Gn={k≥g+1/n} is λ-null. Hence N:=⋃n≥1(En∪Gn) is λ-null, and k≤f and k≤g, thus k≤h, on E∖N.

3.1F2F4F6step 1.1step 2.1

Absolute continuity gives θ(A)=θ(A∖N) for every A, and [F6] gives η(A)=η(A∖N). On A∖N, k≤h, so monotonicity [F4] yields θ(A)=∫A∖Nk dλ≤∫A∖Nh dλ=η(A). Thus every common lower measure is dominated by η.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1∎

Step 1.1 shows that η is dominated by both ρ and σ; step 3.1 shows every measure dominated by both is itself dominated by η. Therefore η is the greatest common submeasure.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

The common submeasure and its bounded density

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let ρ and σ be finite positive measures on a measurable space (E,F). Put λ=ρ+σ. Choose nonnegative measurable Radon–Nikodym density representatives f=dρ/dλ and g=dσ/dλ, modified on a λ-null set so that f+g=1 everywhere. Then η(A):=∫Amin⁡{f,g} dλ(A∈F) is the greatest measure dominated by both ρ and σ. The measurable function a:={min⁡{1,g/f},f>0,1,f=0 takes values in [0,1] and is a version of dη/dρ. Here η≤ρ means η(A)≤ρ(A) for every A∈F.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, finite positive measures ρ,σ on (E,F), and λ=ρ+σ.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC says that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures: a finite sum of measures is a measure. Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures: a finite measure is sigma-finite, since the whole space is a one-set finite-measure cover.

[F2]

A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density, The Radon-Nikodym derivative as an almost-everywhere equivalence class, and Absolute continuity of a signed or complex measure with respect to a positive measure: under AC, if μ,ν are finite positive measures and ν≪μ, there is a real-valued measurable density whose integral on every measurable set recovers ν, unique μ-almost everywhere. Indeed, the constant exhaustion En=E meets the theorem's hypotheses, since a positive measure equals its total variation.

[F3]

A sigma-finite positive measure has a nonnegative Radon–Nikodym density version: under AC, if μ,ν are sigma-finite positive measures and ν≪μ, the class dν/dμ has a finite-valued nonnegative measurable representative.

[F4]

The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure and Measures on sigma-algebras: if h≥0 is measurable, then A↦∫Ah dλ is a measure.

[F5]

Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral and Monotone convergence for the integral: the nonnegative integral is monotone, and increasing limits pass through it.

[F6]

Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions and Integrating against a Radon-Nikodym derivative recovers integration against the measure: a nonnegative measurable function is an increasing limit of simple functions; for simple s, ∫s dρ=∫sf dλ when ρ is finite positive and f=dρ/dλ.

[F7]

Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral and Extended-real-valued measurable functions: finite sums, scalar multiplies, pointwise infima, and Borel preimages of measurable functions are measurable.

[F8]

Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: on any measure space, the integral of the sum of two nonnegative measurable functions is the sum of their integrals. Applied to indicator-restricted functions, this also holds for integrals over every measurable set.

Proof

Given: AC and the finite positive measures ρ,σ.

1.1A1F1F2F3F7F8givenchoose

The measure λ=ρ+σ is finite, and ρ,σ≪λ. By [A1], [F1]–[F3], choose finite-valued nonnegative measurable representatives f=dρ/dλ and g=dσ/dλ. For every B∈F, ∫B(f+g) dλ=ρ(B)+σ(B)=λ(B)=∫B1 dλ. Uniqueness in [F2] gives f+g=1 λ-almost everywhere. On the measurable null set where this fails, replace f by 0 and g by 1; the modified functions remain representatives and now satisfy f+g=1 everywhere.

2.1F4F5F7step 1.1

The function h=min⁡{f,g} is measurable and nonnegative by [F7]. By [F4], η(A)=∫Ah dλ defines a measure. Since h≤f,g, monotonicity in [F5] and the density identities in step 1.1 give η(A)≤ρ(A) and η(A)≤σ(A) for every A. In particular, η(E)≤ρ(E)<∞, so η is finite.

3.1A1F1F2F3F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1givenchoose

Let θ be any measure with θ≤ρ and θ≤σ. It is finite because θ(E)≤ρ(E)<∞, and θ≪λ: if λ(B)=0, nonnegativity gives ρ(B)=0, and hence θ(B)=0. By [A1], [F1]–[F3], choose a finite-valued nonnegative density k=dθ/dλ. For each integer n≥1, the measurable set En={k≥f+1/n} satisfies θ(En)=∫Enk dλ≥∫Enf dλ+λ(En)/n=ρ(En)+λ(En)/n. Since θ(En)≤ρ(En)<∞, this forces λ(En)=0. Thus {k>f}=⋃n≥1En is null; the same argument using θ≤σ gives k≤g almost everywhere. Therefore k≤h outside a measurable λ-null set. Integrals on that null set vanish by simple approximation and [F5]–[F6], so monotonicity yields θ(A)≤η(A) for all A. Together with step 2.1, this proves that η is the greatest common submeasure.

4.1F5F6F7step 2.1∎

For each real c<0, {a>c}=E; for 0≤c<1, {a>c}={f=0}∪({f>0}∩{g−cf>0}); and for c≥1 the set is empty. By [F7], each such set is measurable, so a is measurable. It lies in [0,1], and af=min⁡{f,g} everywhere: on {f>0} this follows by multiplying the ratio by f, while on {f=0} both sides are zero. For a fixed A, approximate a1A increasingly by simple functions. [F6] gives equality of their integrals against ρ and against fλ; applying [F5] to both limits gives ∫Aa dρ=∫Aaf dλ=∫Amin⁡{f,g} dλ=η(A). Thus a is a nonnegative measurable representative of dη/dρ with values in [0,1].

AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Metropolis–Hastings kernel

Definition

Assume AC. The Metropolis–Hastings procedure takes as input a standard-Borel space (X,X) (Standard Borel spaces), a target probability measure π (Probability measures and probability spaces), and a probability kernel Q from (X,X) to itself (Measure kernel and probability kernel).

  1. On the product sigma-algebra (The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates), form the proposal-flow measure μ (Measures on sigma-algebras) on X×X by μ(C)=∫XQ(x,Cx) π(dx),Cx={y:(x,y)∈C}. This is a probability measure by A prior and model kernel define a joint law. Let τ(x,y)=(y,x) and set μT(C)=μ(τ−1C).

  2. Set η=μ∧μT, the greatest measure dominated by both flows. Put λ0=μ+μT, which is a finite measure by Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures, and choose nonnegative measurable representatives f=dμ/dλ0 and g=dμT/dλ0 with f+g=1 everywhere after modification on a λ0-null set. Define α(x,y)={min⁡{1,g(x,y)/f(x,y)},f(x,y)>0,1,f(x,y)=0. This is a jointly measurable version of dη/dμ taking values in [0,1].

  3. For x∈X, compute the integrated acceptance probability a(x)=∫Xα(x,y) Q(x,dy) and rejection probability r(x)=1−a(x).

  4. Return the transition rule P(x,A)=∫X1A(y)α(x,y) Q(x,dy)+1A(x)r(x),A∈X. The second term retains every rejected proposal as a self-transition.

The item The common submeasure and its bounded density proves the common-submeasure construction and density-version claims in step 2.

Remarks

An RN derivative is an almost-everywhere equivalence class, not a distinguished pointwise function (The Radon-Nikodym derivative as an almost-everywhere equivalence class). The explicit convention in step 2 selects a measurable version. Changing that version on a μ-null set leaves the accepted joint flow unchanged, though it can change P(x,⋅) for a π-null set of starting states. The theorem Metropolis–Hastings flow is reversible and invariant ↗ proves that P is a probability kernel and that π is invariant; the procedure alone does not assert irreducibility, uniqueness, convergence, a rate, or a CLT.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The common-density Metropolis–Hastings ratio

Statement

Assume AC. Let (X,X) be standard Borel (Standard Borel spaces) and let λ be a sigma-finite positive measure (Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures) on it. Let the target probability have a finite-valued nonnegative measurable density p:X→[0,∞), and suppose the proposal kernel has a finite-valued nonnegative jointly measurable density q:X×X→[0,∞), so π(A)=∫Ap dλ and Q(x,A)=∫Aq(x,y) dλ(y) for every x and A. Let μ(dx,dy)=π(dx)Q(x,dy) be the forward proposal flow and let μT be its transpose. Put m(x,y)=p(x)q(x,y),mT(x,y)=p(y)q(y,x). There is a jointly measurable version αcd of d(μ∧μT)/dμ given by αcd(x,y)={min⁡{1,p(y)q(y,x)p(x)q(x,y)},m(x,y)>0,1,m(x,y)=0. The version chosen by Metropolis–Hastings kernel agrees with this common-density version μ-almost everywhere; values on a forward-flow null set do not alter the accepted flow.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard-Borel space, a sigma-finite λ, a probability target π with density p, and a probability proposal kernel Q with jointly measurable density q as in the statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

Metropolis–Hastings kernel: the forward flow is μ(C)=∫Q(x,Cx) π(dx), and the algorithm chooses a jointly measurable [0,1]-valued version of dη/dμ, where η=μ∧μT is the greatest common submeasure.

[F2]

A prior and model kernel define a joint law: a probability target and probability kernel define a probability measure on the product sigma-algebra, and integration of a nonnegative product-measurable function against it is iterated integration.

[F4]

Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system: two measures agree on the product sigma-algebra if they agree on its generating rectangles and on an increasing finite-measure exhaustion of rectangles.

[F5]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative product-measurable functions on Λ may be integrated in either order.

[F6]

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined and Extended-real-valued measurable functions: finite products, minima, finite sums, scalar multiples, and threshold sets of measurable functions are measurable.

[F7]

Coordinate maps and permutations are measurable on finite products and Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability: the coordinate swap τ(x,y)=(y,x) is measurable, as are compositions of measurable maps.

[F8]

The common submeasure of two finite densities: if two finite flows have nonnegative densities m,mT with respect to the same sigma-finite measure Λ, their greatest common submeasure has density h=min⁡{m,mT} with respect to Λ.

[F9]

Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions and Monotone convergence for the integral: nonnegative measurable functions are increasing limits of simple functions, and those limits pass through nonnegative integrals.

[F10]

Integrating against a Radon-Nikodym derivative recovers integration against the measure: for simple s and a measure μ with density m, ∫s dμ=∫sm dΛ; applying [F9] extends this identity to nonnegative measurable integrands.

[F11]

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the statement and the accepted-flow construction.

1.1F2F3F5F6F9F10given

Put Λ=λ⊗λ. The lift (x,y)↦p(x) is product-measurable because the preimage of each Borel set B is the rectangle p−1(B)×X. Each section Cx is measurable: for fixed x, the class of all D⊆X2 with Dx∈X is a sigma-algebra containing every measurable rectangle, so it contains X⊗X. Since q and 1C are product-measurable, [F6] makes their product measurable, and [F5] makes H(x):=∫X1C(x,y)q(x,y) λ(dy)=Q(x,Cx) measurable, where the equality is the given density identity for Q(x,⋅). The density identity for π and [F10], first for simple functions and then for H by [F9] and monotone convergence, give μ(C)=∫XH(x) π(dx)=∫XH(x)p(x) λ(dx). Substituting the expression for H and applying Tonelli [F5] yields μ(C)=∫X ⁣∫X1C(x,y)p(x)q(x,y) λ(dy)λ(dx)=∫Cm dΛ. Thus m is a density of the forward probability flow with respect to Λ.

2.1F3F4F7F9step 1.1

Let τ(x,y)=(y,x) and define ΛT(C)=Λ(τ−1C). By [F7], τ is measurable, so ΛT is a measure. On a rectangle A×B, ΛT(A×B)=λ(B)λ(A)=λ(A)λ(B)=Λ(A×B), using the product-measure convention 0⋅∞=0. Choose increasing measurable Xn↑X with λ(Xn)<∞. The rectangles Xn×Xn increase to X2 and have equal finite measure for ΛT and Λ. Measurable rectangles form a generating pi-system, so [F3]–[F4] give ΛT=Λ. For every nonnegative product-measurable u, the identity ∫τ−1Cu dΛ=∫Cu∘τ dΛ holds first for indicators from ΛT=Λ, then for simple functions by finite addition, and for all such u by [F9]. Applying it to u=m yields μT(C)=μ(τ−1C)=∫Cm(y,x) dΛ. Hence mT(x,y)=p(y)q(y,x) is the reverse-flow density.

3.1A1F2F3F8step 1.1step 2.1

Apply [F8] to the finite probability measures μ,μT and the sigma-finite reference measure Λ. Their greatest common submeasure η=μ∧μT has density h=min⁡{m,mT}, so η(C)=∫Ch dΛ(C∈X⊗X).

4.1F6F8F9F10givenstep 3.1

Define αcd=h/m on {m>0} and αcd=1 on {m=0}. It takes values in [0,1]. For a real c<0, {αcd>c}=X2; for 0≤c<1, {αcd>c}={m=0}∪({m>0}∩{h−cm>0}); for c≥1 the set is empty. Each set is measurable by [F6], so αcd is jointly measurable. By its definition, αcdm=h everywhere. For any C, choose nonnegative simple sn↑αcd1C. The simple density identity [F10] gives ∫sn dμ=∫snm dΛ; monotone convergence on both sides then gives ∫Cαcd dμ=∫Cαcdm dΛ=∫Ch dΛ=η(C). Thus αcd is a version of dη/dμ.

5.1F1F8F11step 4.1∎

On {m>0}, algebra gives αcd=min⁡{m,mT}m=min⁡{1,p(y)q(y,x)p(x)q(x,y)}. On {m=0} its specified value is 1, which is permissible because μ({m=0})=∫{m=0}m dΛ=0. The algorithm's chosen derivative and αcd are two versions of the same Radon–Nikodym derivative, so [F11] makes them equal μ-almost everywhere. This proves the common-density ratio and the forward-zero convention without asserting pointwise uniqueness on null sets.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Metropolis–Hastings flow is reversible and invariant

Statement

Assume AC and the hypotheses of Metropolis–Hastings kernel. Its output P is a probability kernel, the joint measure JP(dx,dy)=π(dx)P(x,dy) is symmetric under (x,y)↦(y,x), and π is invariant for P. Symmetry of this joint measure is reversibility. No irreducibility, uniqueness, convergence-rate, or central limit theorem conclusion is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard-Borel space, a target probability π, a proposal probability kernel Q, and the Metropolis–Hastings construction.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

Metropolis–Hastings kernel: the algorithm defines P(x,A)=∫1A(y)α(x,y)Q(x,dy)+1A(x)r(x), where α is a jointly measurable [0,1]-valued version of the accepted-flow density and r(x)=1−∫α(x,y)Q(x,dy).

[F2]

Measure kernel and probability kernel: a probability kernel is a measurable family of measures with mass one at every source point.

[F3]

A prior and model kernel define a joint law: for a probability measure π and probability kernel K, the formula J(C)=∫K(x,Cx) π(dx) defines a probability measure and integrates nonnegative product-measurable functions by iterated integration.

[F4]

The common submeasure and its bounded density: the accepted flow η=μ∧μT is the greatest measure dominated by both flows, and α μ=η.

[F5]

Measurability of integration against a kernel: integration of a nonnegative product-measurable function against a probability kernel is a measurable function of the source point.

[F6]

Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel: π is invariant for P when ∫P(x,A) π(dx)=π(A) for every measurable A.

[F7]

The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates: measurable rectangles generate the product sigma-algebra, so the coordinate-swap map is measurable.

[F8]

Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable: each section of a product-measurable function is measurable.

[F9]

The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure: for a nonnegative measurable h, A↦∫Ah dν is a measure.

[F10]

Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures: a finite sum of measures with nonnegative coefficients is a measure.

[F11]

General-state reversibility by symmetric flow measure: reversibility means that the joint flow measure JP(dx,dy)=π(dx)P(x,dy) is symmetric under coordinate swap.

[F12]

General-state reversibility implies invariance: on any measurable state space, a probability kernel reversible with respect to a probability measure leaves that measure invariant.

[F13]

Measures on sigma-algebras: a measure vanishes on the empty set and is countably additive on pairwise disjoint measurable sets.

Proof

Given: AC, π, Q, and the procedure in [F1].

1.1F1F5given

The acceptance function satisfies 0≤α≤1. For each x, 0≤a(x):=∫α(x,y)Q(x,dy)≤1 because Q(x,⋅) is a probability measure. The function a is measurable by [F5], so r(x)=1−a(x) is measurable and takes values in [0,1].

2.1F1F2F5F8F9F10step 1.1algebra

For fixed x, the accepted term A↦∫1A(y)α(x,y)Q(x,dy) is a measure by [F9], since the section y↦α(x,y) is measurable by [F8]. The rejection term A↦r(x)1A(x) is a measure: for disjoint sets at most one can contain x. Their sum is a measure by [F10], and its total mass is a(x)+r(x)=1. For each fixed A, the accepted term is measurable in x by [F5], and the rejection term is measurable since r and 1A are measurable. Thus [F2] applies pointwise and P is a probability kernel.

2.2F7F9step 1.1given

Define δ(x)=(x,x). For every measurable rectangle A×B, δ−1(A×B)=A∩B∈X. Since these rectangles generate X⊗X by [F7], δ is measurable. By [F9], ζ(D):=∫Dr dπ is a measure on (X,X); it is finite because 0≤r≤1 and π(X)=1. Define R(C):=ζ(δ−1C)=∫1C(x,x)r(x) π(dx). It vanishes at the empty set, and preimages of disjoint sets under δ are disjoint; countable additivity of ζ therefore makes R a finite measure on the product sigma-algebra.

3.1A1F1F3F4step 2.1step 2.2

Step 2.1 has established that P is a probability kernel, so [F3] now supplies the joint measure JP. Applying the same joint-law result to the input kernel Q gives the proposal flow μ and its iterated-integral identity. Thus, for every product-measurable C, JP(C)=∫ ⁣∫1C(x,y)α(x,y)Q(x,dy) π(dx)+R(C)=∫Cα dμ+R(C)=η(C)+R(C), where the last equality uses α μ=η from [F4].

4.1F4F7F13step 3.1construct

The coordinate swap τ(x,y)=(y,x) is measurable by [F7] and is an involution. Define ηT(C):=η(τ−1C). This is a measure: measurability of τ makes the preimages measurable, and preimages preserve the empty set and disjoint countable unions, so [F4, F13] give the measure properties. Since η is the greatest measure dominated by both μ and μT, its transpose is also dominated by both: for every C, ηT(C)≤μT(C) and ηT(C)≤μ(C). Maximality gives ηT≤η; transposing this inequality and using τ2=id gives η≤ηT. Hence ηT=η.

5.1F7F11step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Since τ∘δ=δ, step 2.2 gives R(C)=R(τ−1C) for every product-measurable C. Step 4.1 gives the same symmetry for η, so the decomposition in step 3.1 yields JP(C)=JP(τ−1C) for every C. Thus the joint flow is symmetric, so P is reversible by [F11].

6.1F2F6F12step 2.1step 5.1∎

Steps 2.1 and 5.1 prove that P is a probability kernel reversible with respect to π. The general-state result [F12] applies on this measurable space and gives ∫P(x,A) π(dx)=π(A) for every A∈X. Thus π is invariant in the sense of [F6].

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources