Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact oriented manifolds with boundary have finite-dimensional field cohomology

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let W be a compact oriented smooth n-manifold with boundary ∂W (possibly empty), let F be a field, and let the cohomology be singular cohomology with coefficients in F. Then every Hk(W;F) and every relative group Hk(W,∂W;F), k≥0, is a finite-dimensional F-vector space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact oriented smooth n-manifold W with boundary ∂W and a field F.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

Assuming ACω, the labelled double DM of a smooth manifold with boundary M carries a smooth boundaryless manifold structure, and the double of The double of a smooth manifold with boundary is the quotient of M+⊔M− identifying the two copies of the boundary (The double has a well-defined smooth structure).

[L2]

In ZF, AC⇒DC⇒ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[L3]

For an oriented manifold M with boundary, the induced boundary orientation is fixed by the outward-normal-first convention: its local generator is (−1)n times the tangent generator for the product orientation, and each component inherits its sign from the supplied interior orientation (Relative fundamental class and boundary orientation).

[L4]

Assume AC. If M is a closed R-oriented n-manifold and R is a commutative PID, then every Hq(M;R) and every Hp(M;R) is finitely generated over R (Finite generation from cap with a finite fundamental cycle).

[L5]

Singular homology with coefficients in an abelian group is covariantly functorial: a retraction r∘i=id of spaces induces r∗∘i∗=id on homology (Singular chains and singular homology are covariantly functorial).

[L6]

Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial, so a retraction r∘i=id induces i∗∘r∗=id on cohomology (Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial).

[L7]

Assume AC. For a compact R-oriented n-manifold M with boundary A, cap with the relative fundamental class gives isomorphisms Tp:Hp(M,A;R)→∼Hn−p(M;R) for every p (Poincaré–Lefschetz duality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1L1L2given

The double D(W) of W is a smooth boundaryless manifold by [L1], whose ACω hypothesis holds because [A1] gives AC and [L2] gives AC⇒ACω; it is compact because W is compact.

2.1step 1.1L3given

The double D(W) is oriented: orient the labelled first copy W+ by the given orientation of W and the second copy W− by its reverse, so that at every boundary point the two induced boundary orientations are opposite and hence agree after this reversal; by [L3] the induced boundary orientations are determined by the interior orientations, so they glue to a global orientation of D(W), making D(W) a closed oriented n-manifold.

3.1step 2.1L5L6given

The folding map r:D(W)→W that maps both labelled copies identically onto W is well defined on the quotient and continuous, and its composite with the inclusion i:W→D(W) of the first copy is r∘i=idW; hence by [L5] the induced maps satisfy r∗∘i∗=id on Hk(−;Z) and on Hk(−;F), so i∗ is injective with left inverse r∗, while by [L6] the induced maps satisfy i∗∘r∗=id on Hk(−;F), so r∗ is injective with left inverse i∗.

4.1step 3.1L4A1

Applying [L4] to the closed oriented manifold D(W) with R=Z, and again with R=F (a field is a PID and a Z-orientation induces an F-orientation), shows that Hk(D(W);Z), Hk(D(W);F) and Hk(D(W);F) are finitely generated over their coefficient rings; a direct summand of a finitely generated module is finitely generated, so by step 3.1 the groups Hk(W;Z), Hk(W;F) and Hk(W;F) are finitely generated, and for the field F this says exactly that Hk(W;F) and Hk(W;F) are finite-dimensional over F.

5.1step 4.1L7A1

Cap with the relative fundamental class of the compact oriented manifold W gives, by [L7] with R=F and A=∂W, an F-linear isomorphism Hk(W,∂W;F)→∼Hn−k(W;F) for every k≥0; the target is finite-dimensional over F by step 4.1.

6.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Therefore every Hk(W;F) is finite-dimensional by step 4.1 and every relative group Hk(W,∂W;F) is finite-dimensional by step 5.1, which is the assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources