Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Collared gluing has relative excision and evaluation maps

Statement

Assume ACω. Let W and W′ be compact oriented smooth eight-manifolds glued along an orientation-preserving identification of their common boundary M, and let N=W∪M(−W′) be the resulting closed oriented eight-manifold. Then there are natural excision isomorphisms rW:H∗(N,V;R)→ ∼ H∗(W,M;R),rW′:H∗(N,U;R)→ ∼ H∗(W′,M;R) for the collar neighbourhoods U,V displayed below, together with the corresponding isomorphisms in relative homology; and under these maps the fundamental class [N] restricts to [W,M] on the first side and to −[W′,M] on the second, compatibly with Kronecker evaluation and with the relative cup products.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Compact oriented smooth eight-manifolds W,W′ with a common oriented boundary M, the orientation-preserving boundary identification, and N=W∪M(−W′).

[A1]

Countable choice ACω is assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L1]

A compact smooth manifold with boundary has a collar neighbourhood of its boundary, and the identification of the two boundary collars glues the two smooth structures into a smooth structure on N whose seam is interior (Collar neighborhood theorem, Collar gluing and seam smoothing give transitivity).

[L2]

Excision: if Z‾⊆int⁡XA, then Hn(X,A;G)≅Hn(X∖Z,A∖Z;G) and Hn(X∖Z,A∖Z;G)≅Hn(X,A;G) (Excision for singular cohomology, Excision for singular homology).

[L3]

Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology, via the singular chain homotopy formula (Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology, The singular chain homotopy formula).

[L4]

Relative chains and cochains, their boundary and coboundary, are those of Relative singular homology and Relative singular cochain complex.

[L5]

The relative fundamental class [M0,A] of a compact oriented manifold with boundary is characterized by its local restrictions and is compatible with boundary orientations (Relative fundamental class and boundary orientation, A collar constructs the relative orientation class and its boundary class).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1A1given

By [L1] choose a bicollar M×(−2a,2a) of the seam, with W on the negative side and W′ on the positive side, and set U=int⁡W∪M×(−2a,a) and V=int⁡W′∪M×(−a,2a); then U,V are open in N, they cover N, and U∩V=M×(−a,a).

2.1step 1.1L1L3

The collar-height map that sends t≥−a to zero and fixes t≤−2a, with monotone interpolation and the identity outside the collar, defines maps of pairs (U,U∩V)→(W,M) and (W,M)→(U,U∩V) that are inverse up to homotopy of pairs, by [L3] applied to the linear interpolation with the identity; hence the inclusion (W,M)→(U,U∩V) is an equivalence of pairs, and the same construction on the other side gives (W′,M)→(V,U∩V).

3.1step 2.1L2L4

Excision applies with X=N, A=V and Z=N∖U: the set Z is closed and contained in the open V, so by [L2] restriction gives isomorphisms H∗(N,V;R)→H∗(U,U∩V;R) and, with the other cover, H∗(N,U;R)→H∗(V,U∩V;R); composing with step 2.1 yields the isomorphisms rW:H∗(N,V;R)→H∗(W,M;R) and rW′:H∗(N,U;R)→H∗(W′,M;R), and the same argument with [L2]'s homology clause gives the corresponding relative homology isomorphisms.

4.1step 3.1L6

Naturality of the relative product under the maps of step 3.1 gives, for relative classes a,b on (W,M) represented through the inverse EW=rW−1, the identity rW(EW(a)⌣EW(b))=a⌣b, because the restriction maps preserve the quotient-cochain front/back products by [L6].

5.1step 3.1step 4.1L5

The image of [N] under H8(N)→H8(N,V) is [W,M]: at every interior point of W its local restriction is the prescribed orientation generator of W, and excision together with the collar homotopies of step 2.1 preserves that generator, so [L5]'s uniqueness identifies the class; on the second side the ambient orientation of N is the reverse of that of W′, hence the image is −[W′,M].

6.1step 5.1L6

Consequently, for η∈H8(N,V;R), naturality of Kronecker evaluation [L6] gives ⟨η,[N]⟩=⟨rWη,[W,M]⟩, and with the other cover the analogous identity holds with the negative sign on −[W′,M].

7.1step 6.1L5

Components of the fillings that are closed or lie entirely on one side are treated by the same argument with the pair equal to the absolute pair; the comparison is componentwise and adds over the finitely many components.

8.1step 7.1∎

Therefore the stated excision isomorphisms exist, the fundamental class restricts as asserted on the two sides, and the comparisons are compatible with relative products and Kronecker evaluation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources