How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complementation sends a disjoint -regular pair of density to one of density
Statement
Let be disjoint nonempty vertex sets. If is -regular of density in , then it is -regular of density in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Disjoint nonempty sets forming an -regular pair of density in .
Regularity means that every sufficiently large subpair has density within of (-regular pairs and self-regular vertex sets).
In the complement, exactly the missing pairs of distinct vertices are edges (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
Proof
Because and are disjoint, every ordered pair in consists of distinct vertices and is an edge in exactly one of ; hence for every nonempty , .
Taking gives .
For every subpair meeting the thresholds in [L1], , so the complemented pair is -regular.
Disjointness is essential for the exact density formula. When and overlap, diagonal pairs are edges in neither graph and contribute a correction of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 9 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. Conlon and J. Fox, Graph removal lemmas, sec. 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)