Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex Specht modules are self-dual with real-valued characters

Statement

For every n≥0 and λ⊢n the complex Specht module Sλ carries a nondegenerate symmetric Sn-invariant bilinear form b(x,y)=∑TxTyT given by the coefficientwise product in the tabloid basis, so v↦b(v,−) is an isomorphism of CSn-modules Sλ→(Sλ)∗; equivalently Sλ is self-dual. Consequently χλ(g−1)=χλ(g) for every g∈Sn, that is, every irreducible character of Sn is real-valued.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥0, a partition λ⊢n, the tabloid module Mλ with its tabloid basis, and the complex Specht module Sλ⊆Mλ.

[F1]

The tabloid module Mλ has the finite tabloid basis, and Sλ is the complex span of the polytabloids es=κs⋅{s}, where κs=∑γ∈Cssgn⁡(γ)γ acts through the permutation action on tabloids (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules, Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules).

[F2]

The tabloid-basis Hermitian form ⟨x,y⟩=∑TxT‾yT is positive definite, the tabloid basis is orthonormal for it, and it is Sn-invariant (Invariant Hermitian product on a tabloid module).

[F4]

The dual representation acts by (g⋅f)(v)=f(g−1⋅v), and χV∗(g)=χV(g)‾ for a finite-dimensional complex representation V (The dual or contragredient complex representation, Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).

[F5]

For a finite-dimensional complex representation of a finite group, χ(g−1)=χ(g)‾ (For a complex character, χ(1)=dim⁡V, χ is a class function, and ∣χ(g)∣≤χ(1) with equality exactly at scalars).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebra

Define b(x,y)=∑TxTyT for x=∑TxTT and y=∑TyTT in Mλ. The expression is a finite sum of products of two complex numbers, so b is a symmetric bilinear form; writing x‾=∑TxT‾T for the coefficientwise conjugate, b(x,y)=∑TxTyT=∑TxT‾‾yT=⟨x‾,y⟩ by [F2]. If σ∈Sn permutes the tabloid basis, then the coefficient of T in σx is xσ−1T, so b(σx,σy)=∑Txσ−1Tyσ−1T=∑TxTyT=b(x,y) after reindexing the finite basis. Hence b is Sn-invariant.

1.2F1algebra

The Specht module is stable under coefficientwise conjugation: Sλ‾=Sλ. Each polytabloid is a finite integer combination of tabloid basis vectors, since κs permutes the tabloid basis with signs ±1, so es‾=es by [F1]. For x=∑scses∈Sλ one has x‾=∑scs‾es∈Sλ; the conjugation map is an involution of the complex vector space Mλ, so applying it twice gives equality.

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2

The form b is nondegenerate on Sλ. Let x∈Sλ with b(x,y)=0 for all y∈Sλ. By step 1.1 this says ⟨x‾,y⟩=0 for all y∈Sλ, so x‾∈(Sλ)⊥. Since x‾∈Sλ by step 1.2, [F3] forces x‾=0, hence x=0. Conversely, if x≠0 then x‾≠0 and the same identity exhibits some y∈Sλ with b(x,y)≠0, because x‾∉(Sλ)⊥ by [F3] and the orthogonal complement is defined by vanishing against every vector of the subspace (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement).

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The map Φ:Sλ→(Sλ)∗, Φ(v)=b(v,−), is C-linear and Sn-equivariant for the dual action of [F4]: for w∈Sλ, Φ(σv)(w)=b(σv,w)=b(v,σ−1w)=Φ(v)(σ−1w)=(σ⋅Φ(v))(w) by Sn-invariance of b from step 1.1. By nondegeneracy from step 2.1 and finite-dimensionality of Sλ, Φ is injective; since dim⁡C(Sλ)∗=dim⁡CSλ, it is an isomorphism. Thus Sλ≅(Sλ)∗ as CSn-modules.

4.1F4F5step 3.1algebra∎

By step 3.1 the character of Sλ equals the character of its dual, so for every g∈Sn the dual-character formula [F4] gives χλ(g)=χ(Sλ)∗(g)=χλ(g)‾; hence χλ(g) is real. Combining with [F5] gives χλ(g−1)=χλ(g)‾=χλ(g) for every g∈Sn. Every irreducible complex character of Sn is a Specht character χλ by Specht modules classify the complex irreducibles of Sn, so all of them are real-valued.

No form of the Axiom of Choice is used: the tabloid form, coefficientwise conjugation and the character comparison are finite-dimensional over C.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources