How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Connected covers of smooth manifolds have a canonical smooth structure
Statement
Let be a smooth manifold and let be a covering map whose total space is connected. There is a unique smooth-manifold structure on the given topological space for which is a smooth local diffeomorphism. It has the same dimension as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth -manifold and a covering map with connected.
A covering is locally a disjoint union of sheets, each mapped homeomorphically onto an evenly covered open subset of the base. Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings.
A smooth manifold is a Hausdorff, second-countable, locally Euclidean space equipped with a maximal smooth atlas. Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces.
Local path connectedness lifts along coverings, and a connected locally path-connected space is path connected. Local path-connectedness lifts and descends along covering maps, A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open.
In a locally connected space the components of every open subset are open. A space is locally connected exactly when every component of every open subspace is open; in that case the components of the space itself are clopen.
A smooth atlas is contained in a unique maximal smooth atlas. Each smooth atlas is contained in a unique maximal smooth atlas.
Proof
Proof technique: pull back covering charts, with the countability point checked separately.
If , surjectivity in the covering-map definition forces ; the empty pulled-back atlas gives the unique compatible smooth structure, the local-diffeomorphism condition is vacuous, and the asserted dimension is the supplied dimension of . Henceforth assume . The space is locally Euclidean of dimension : if is an evenly covered coordinate domain and is a sheet over , then a chart pulls back to the chart . It is Hausdorff: points with different images are separated by inverse images of disjoint base neighborhoods, while distinct points in one fibre lie in distinct sheets over a common evenly covered neighborhood.
It remains to check second countability rather than silently assuming it. Fix a countable base for . By local path connectedness, the components of every are open by [F4]. For fixed these components form a countable family: each contains some , and assigning to it the least such is injective because distinct components are disjoint. Thus all components of all the form a countable path-connected base. Its subfamily consisting of members that are contained in an evenly covered coordinate domain is still countable and is a base, because such domains exist around every point and may first be refined by a and then by its component.
By [F3], is path connected. Fix . For each , the sheets over form a countable family. Indeed, a path from to a point of a given sheet has compact parameter interval, so it can be subdivided into finitely many pieces whose projected images lie in members of . At each transition insert a member of contained in the intersection of the two consecutive members. Starting with the sheet containing , this finite string of indices determines each successive sheet uniquely: over a connected transition set, one sheet is connected and hence lies in exactly one sheet over the next base set. Finite strings of natural numbers are countable, and assigning to each sheet the least string that reaches it gives an injection into a countable set. No countable family of arbitrary choices is made.
The sheets over the countable base therefore form a countable base for . Together with step 1.1 this proves that is a topological -manifold. On every such sheet use the pulled-back chart from step 1.1. If and are base charts, the transition between two overlapping pulled-back charts is the restriction of , because both sheet charts use the same projection . Hence these charts form a smooth atlas, and [F5] gives a smooth structure for which is a smooth local diffeomorphism.
Conversely, in any smooth structure on the given topology for which is a local diffeomorphism, every sufficiently small sheet chart is exactly a pullback of a smooth base chart. It is therefore compatible with the atlas of step 3.1. The two maximal atlases coincide by [F5], proving uniqueness. The construction and all countability arguments are in ZF; after the empty case was discharged in step 1.1, the fixed point is one element of one nonempty space.
Depends on
- Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings
- Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts
- Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces
- Local path-connectedness lifts and descends along covering maps
- A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open
- A space is locally connected exactly when every component of every open subspace is open; in that case the components of the space itself are clopen
- Each smooth atlas is contained in a unique maximal smooth atlas
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I (standard reference, not scraped)
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)